CSNbbs

Full Version: NET Rankings -FINAL for 2018-2019 Season
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Due to the importance of the NET and to reduce board clutter, I created this new thread to track NET during the 2018-2019 season.

The first number on the left is NET as of 4/8/19 // The last number on the right is NET as of 4/7/19.

Houston 6 // 4
Cincy 24 // 25
UCF 26 // 30
Memphis 48 // 46
Temple 57 // 56
WSU 63 // 83
USF 83 // 99
UConn 91 // 95
Tulsa 93 // 94
SMU 94 // 98
ECU 253 // 258
Tulane 296 // 298

Click Here for NET Source

Click Here to Access "Team Sheets"

Click Here for NCAA Tourney Selection Criteria
111...

[Image: tenor.gif?itemid=5306828]

We suck.
Just a reminder of the NET factors:



Click on the Tweet and pic to see all the factors.
Put it to rest. This season is over, O-V-E-R.
(01-08-2019 01:21 PM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ]111...

[Image: tenor.gif?itemid=5306828]

We suck.

Tulsa is great, and UConn stinks.
no teams under 300!!!
(01-08-2019 02:51 PM)Knights_of_UCF Wrote: [ -> ]no teams under 300!!!

You have quite the low standards. We shouldn't have a team over 200. UCF fan gonna UCF (outside of football).
(01-08-2019 02:58 PM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-08-2019 02:51 PM)Knights_of_UCF Wrote: [ -> ]no teams under 300!!!

You have quite the low standards. We shouldn't have a team over 200. UCF fan gonna UCF (outside of football).

wish we didn't have any teams under 100 07-coffee3
(01-08-2019 03:07 PM)Knights_of_UCF Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-08-2019 02:58 PM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-08-2019 02:51 PM)Knights_of_UCF Wrote: [ -> ]no teams under 300!!!

You have quite the low standards. We shouldn't have a team over 200. UCF fan gonna UCF (outside of football).

wish we didn't have any teams under 100 07-coffee3

You don't want any teams under 100??? Sounds like you're an anti-AAC troll!
Thanks man - Can you just update them on the top of the thread when they are renewed
(01-08-2019 04:11 PM)panicstricken Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks man - Can you just update them on the top of the thread when they are renewed

OK, but I cannot promise I will update everyday. 03-wink
(01-08-2019 04:45 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-08-2019 04:11 PM)panicstricken Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks man - Can you just update them on the top of the thread when they are renewed

OK, but I cannot promise I will update everyday. 03-wink

We demand daily updates!
Three safely in. Three with work to do
(01-08-2019 06:02 PM)strongv Wrote: [ -> ]Three safely in. Three with work to do

Pretty much spot on.

I think at least one of those with work to do gets in and probably two. Temple wins vs Penn and they will be in a strong position of really just needing to not slip up and lose a bad game. Tulsa needs a top four/five finish, no bad losses (the Southern Illinois midnight game was our one) and an added good win would help as well. Memphis needs some good wins (they have ok wins and no real bad losses) and no bad losses.

We probably have two or maybe three nit teams as well (USF, UConn, SMU) dependending on what they do. So 7/8 legit post season teams.
(01-08-2019 02:51 PM)Knights_of_UCF Wrote: [ -> ]no teams under 300!!!

Thank you Cronin! 03-lmfao
3 safely in??? You dudes love that crack pipe. Houston is the only one safely in right now.
(01-08-2019 06:34 PM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ]3 safely in??? You dudes love that crack pipe. Houston is the only one safely in right now.

Actually no one is technically safely in (well maybe UConn's women's team).

But barring something catastrophic I dont see Houston, UCF, or Cincy falling out of the the top 40. That's safe.
(01-08-2019 06:43 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-08-2019 06:34 PM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ]3 safely in??? You dudes love that crack pipe. Houston is the only one safely in right now.

Actually no one is technically safely in (well maybe UConn's women's team).

But barring something catastrophic I dont see Houston, UCF, or Cincy falling out of the the top 40. That's safe.

UCF is real bubbly to me. They'll need a top 3 AAC finish and few bid thieves to get in. You heard it here first.
Katz has us as an 11 in the play-in game...how does that line up with Net rank of 34?
(01-08-2019 07:30 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote: [ -> ]Katz has us as an 11 in the play-in game...how does that line up with Net rank of 34?

It does not line up. The integrity of the NET and the NCAA will be on the line Selection Sunday if there is significant variance between the NET ranking and the schools picked and seeded.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Reference URL's