CSNbbs

Full Version: Ever had anyone dog you with an accusation that...
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Aside: This being a wild west forum, let's see if this flies. I purposely will not call out any usernames, but then, it isn't too difficult to figure out if one actually bothers to explore it in view of my recent reputation negatives.

...it appears plainly they're persisting with because it's actually applicable to their own person/thoughts/behaviors?

Self-evidently, I have, or I wouldn't have brought it up. Maybe others have, too... this is an invite to hear your stories, as I reflect on my own.

In my case, I've been repeatedly tagged with the word, "narcissist" by a particular young poster.

So, let's just explore this... who is a narcissist?

1) Is it the guy who can't stand to not tell everyone that he got some inside medical information about a Marshall player, that by virtue of HIPPA laws, it was illegal for him to even know... but that he went ahead and broadcast that anyway... do narcissists cross lines just to grab attention like that?

2) Or is it the guy who similarly either made up the story about talking with a former Marshall player's mom, or who exposed that player's mom as someone who was not at all shy to share with someone outside of her family things that supportive moms would never share with someone outside of the family... do narcissists cross lines just to grab attention like that?

3) Or is it the guy who broadcasts on a message board his friggin IQ score? (... because, of course, no one would ever have known it to be that high, so he was attempting to do everyone a good service. Of course.)

4) Or is the guy who makes conclusive statements as-if he is Mr. Omniscience all... the... time. To the point that his nickname becomes "Foregone Conclusion?"

5) Or is it the guy who so loves the image of always being right, his pretentiousness will not allow him to bring himself to admit when he misses something, and to backtrack and even apologize for his error.

Narcissists just don't seem to like it much when someone else notices their narcissism and can actually point to documented, timestamped evidence... and worse, that they can't do the same in return to somehow lessen the fallout.

Irrational, hypocritical, and, sure enough, annoying.

So, I turn it back to others reading this... ever had anyone dog you with an accusation, clearly motivated because they themselves are the ones guilty of whatever they've charged you with?
Dude, after reading a few lines of your post and losing interest long before you wrapped up your oh-so-eloquent speech, I'd recommend you remember this is a relatively anonymous sports message board and it appears you are taking it WAY to seriously. Step away from the ledge, place your "enemy" on ignore, and take a deep breath. If this is not entertainment for you, you might want to try another outlet for which you can spend your discretionary time.
Okay, count me intrigued...

1) What does eloquence have to do with it? Some penalty for people who appear to write for a living?

2) What suggests that I'm taking the board way to seriously? That I ask the question? But it's a discussion board, right? That's not what we do here?

3) Is there something wrong in your opinion with the question itself... "ever had anyone dog you with an accusation, clearly motivated because they themselves are the ones guilty of whatever they've charged you with?"

4) Why would I put anyone on ignore? I'm a grown ass man. Very grown. I don't have to have some artificial means to avoid reading posters' posts that I want to avoid.

5) Isn't it more sensible that I brought this up *because* I view this as entertainment, and thus, I post to explore how others dealt with annoying people who ***don't*** view this as entertainment, but rather as a social club or as an ego builder? I'd think so, but I'm open to your thoughts.

And just for future reference, I deal with college students a lot as a matter of my profession, so when someone starts a sentence with "dude," just know it doesn't scream "This is someone who can talk down to you because he's really really full of wisdom and maturity." That doesn't mean you aren't someone who is full of wisdom and maturity. Maybe you are. Just an observation on my part, not much different from the fact that you decided to offer your observations.

Now... having said all of that... are you able to answer the question? Because if you aren't, then maybe this wasn't the thread for you, I mean, since it was explicitly requested that those people respond.
You asked for an opinion on a relatively unmoderated message board and I gave it, succinctly. You proceed to write another novel for which I have zero propensity to read.

Quit tucking your junk between your legs and telling the fat chick to rub some lotion on her skin. Nobody gives a damn about the genesis of your beef with another poster that takes the time to insult you. You take this **** way too seriously and need to find another outlet. You asked for an opinion and you got it. Apologies if the bluntness of the response irritated your itchy mangina.
I'm actually a good-natured guy. And in my first response, I gave you some benefit of a doubt. But this is over the top. Your motives are clear now.



So, you don't read what I've written, but you're all too anxious to come here and dispense your wisdom.

Yeah, let's talk about presumptuousness and pretentiousness, shall we?

Btw, that's as far as I read of your speech... no need to go any further.

Your behavior is that of a GRANDSTANDER.

It's not that you're wrong to express your opinion... again, it's a discussion board, so more power to you (and to me)...

It's that if you were the authentic type who genuinely was just looking out for the other guy, that's the kind of thing that would show up in a PM.

Instead, you do what you did because you are how you are. Grandstanding. "Hey everyone look at me crap on this other guy's post, and laugh with me.... hehehhe..."

You said it yourself... this is an out of the way place, so what is so important to carve out a few minutes to engage a stranger like me?

For your own ego-kick.

Shallow. Hollow.

"Dude"... I've been doing this message board thing 20-ish years. I know full well what I'm doing here. I'm the open-minded type who would welcome your input if conveyed to me in an appropriate way, but since it wasn't, that speaks for the value of your input.

Engage the question, or don't, but don't insult anyone's intelligence that you're here doing some public service with your condescending quips.
Why am I surprised that the first person attracted to respond to this thread would be someone who evidently was offended by the topic of the OP, and felt it important to stick up for his kind?

Silly me.
You must be a woman. No guy gets so emotionally upset about message board postings, and I simply answered the question you posed. This passive-aggressive ranting is hilarious, and your histrionics make a middle school girl having her first period seem somewhat sane and rational.

Take a Midol, drink a Zima, and get your nails done, and you'll forget all about that meanie on the message board that hurt your feelings, sweetheart.

And yes, you do look fat in that dress.
(10-26-2018 11:13 AM)ODUsmitty Wrote: [ -> ]I simply answered the question you posed.

You're delirious. You made up a question and answered it. You did not even barely address the one posed. Had you done so, we would be having that conversation.

It's called hijacking a thread, and it happens when people don't want to talk about what the thread is actually about.

Like I said... silly me... that this wouldn't first attract the very kind of person implicated in the OP.


(10-26-2018 11:13 AM)ODUsmitty Wrote: [ -> ]This passive-aggressive ranting is hilarious,

To be "passive aggressive," it would have to be the case that the person you call my "enemy" frequented this board. (Who else should possibly take offense and feel themselves being victims of aggression?)

Seemingly, you don't understand the term nor the irony that you of all people would make the accusation... given that initial response as-if offering some altruistic kind-hearted instruction, cleverly (to your own self-deception) hiding that I struck a nerve when I throw shade on posters who hurl insults that are, in reality, characteristic of themselves... in this case, narcissists who accuse others of being narcissistic.

Though, for a change, you finally happened to nibble around the actual question by illustrating an example.

Thanks for that. I suppose.
(10-26-2018 12:05 PM)_sturt_ Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for that. I suppose.

Anything I can do to help. Please let me know when I can be of further assistance.
Yeah... riiight...

[Image: ok-then.gif&key=5435d8b19088fbb7...ce2b503a59]

(Looking for the re-set button, but it's tough when you have these hijack attempts to get things back to the intended conversation. Any help on that is appreciated.)
Let's try this again, shall we???...

[Image: wfa.gif]



Honest question. Honest, relevant answers coveted...

Ever had anyone dog you with an accusation that it appears plainly they're persisting with because it's actually applicable to their own person/thoughts/behaviors?


(Reference the OP for further elaboration on my reason for asking.)
Congrats to ODUSmitty....

Your narcissist friends are proud that you evidently stuck up for them effectively. The hijack thing worked.

smh
Anything I can do to help. My work here is done.
That is, only if hijacking were, in fact, a "helpful" exercise rather than a self-centered, ego-masturbation one. Your work here is done = orgasm achieved.
You are such a freaking drama queen. Apologies if your your feelings got hurt, but we both know they were hurt when you posted the original message, which is exactly why I responded as I did.

Sleep well, Princess. I am sure there is someone out there that actually gives a damn about your drama, so don't give up hope.
You can whine all you want about the legitimacy of the question. It doesn't change the fact that it was a legitimate question, and it doesn't change the fact that you self-identified yourself as the type of person whose inferiority complex is so substantial that he interjects himself into threads where he has no actual interest in the actual topic... needing to seize every opportunity to parade himself as some kind of judge of what is okay to post and what isn't... as-if anyone gives a crap about his judgment.

Like I said... your self-serving ego-gratification orgasm achieved.

And here's the funny part... a SECOND time, you illustrate the substance of the question... there is no greater drama queen than the person who inserts himself into threads simply to try to create drama.
Its okay, you'll feel less bloated in a couple of days.
You keep going back to the misogyny trough like a pig that knows no bottom.
This whole conversation is nuts.
It's like I'm enveloped in some timewarp prank where I'm Alex, trapped here with Louie and Jim.

Maybe this place is just too much of a backwater board to lend hope for serious adult conversation after all. *sigh*
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's