So just a personal observation. ABC world news has been running ads saying the president alleges he was spied on, but where is the evidence?
When they talk about the Mueller probe or anything anti-Trump they never f**king mention the word evidence or ask where it is. I hate this BS. So hypocritical.
Today's media is the 21st century equivalent of Leni Riefenstahl style propaganda.
Very true and I agree with the frustration. However, can you imagine what level the bias would be without the "Power of The Tweet." The "Fake News" narrative was another blow to the MSM's power and influence. The next stage is how much will their bias really matter to anyone not associated with the radical left...
The funny thing is that they actually report the "evidence" all the time. Anything they got on "Russia Russia Russia" came from the spying. The most interesting thing NOT being reported---Sara Carter (who has yet to be wrong) has reported that the FISA warrant granted for Carter Page was the HIGHEST level of surveillance available. What people dont understand is the highest level of surveillance usually automatically allows surveillance authority for at least 2 "jumps". Whats a jump? Well, it means anyone who called Carter Page could themselves be bugged. Then anyone who talks to the person who talked to Carter Page can also be bugged (the second "jump"). If you are listening in on the calls of a guy who is running the Trump campaign---you could have a HUGE network of surveillance for that campaign (which would likely include Trump) in no time with a paper trail that only specifies "Carter Page". My guess is this is why DOJ really really doesnt want to comply with the document requests from Congress. Its all over once for a lot of high level Obama people (including perhaps Obama himself) once that is verified.
(05-24-2018 05:31 PM)Jugnaut Wrote: [ -> ]So just a personal observation. ABC world news has been running ads saying the president alleges he was spied on, but where is the evidence?
When they talk about the Mueller probe or anything anti-Trump they never f**king mention the word evidence or ask where it is. I hate this BS. So hypocritical.
Librocrites don't understand logic, reason nor the definition of the word "irony."
(05-24-2018 05:31 PM)Jugnaut Wrote: [ -> ]So just a personal observation. ABC world news has been running ads saying the president alleges he was spied on, but where is the evidence?
When they talk about the Mueller probe or anything anti-Trump they never f**king mention the word evidence or ask where it is. I hate this BS. So hypocritical.
Remember, ABC said canceling Last Man Standing had nothing to do with the fact Tim Allen was a conservative. Yea, right.
(05-24-2018 08:28 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]The funny thing is that they actually report the "evidence" all the time. Anything they got on "Russia Russia Russia" came from the spying. The most interesting thing NOT being reported---Sara Carter (who has yet to be wrong) has reported that the FISA warrant granted for Carter Page was the HIGHEST level of surveillance available. What people dont understand is the highest level of surveillance usually automatically allows surveillance authority for at least 2 "jumps". Whats a jump? Well, it means anyone who called Carter Page could themselves be bugged. Then anyone who talks to the person who talked to Carter Page can also be bugged (the second "jump"). If you are listening in on the calls of a guy who is running the Trump campaign---you could have a HUGE network of surveillance for that campaign (which would likely include Trump) in no time with a paper trail that only specifies "Carter Page". My guess is this is why DOJ really really doesnt want to comply with the document requests from Congress. Its all over once for a lot of high level Obama people (including perhaps Obama himself) once that is verified.
The Page FISA warrant provided a backdoor to Trump himself, that's what they needed, wanted, and got.
I hope this whole thing blows their asses clean out of office and into jail where they belong.