CSNbbs

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...tions.html

Quote:The New York Times issued four different corrections to an antagonistic, failed hit piece on Foundation for Defense of Democracies CEO Mark Dubowitz, who once opposed President Barack Obama's Iran nuclear pact.

The embarrassing article falsely claimed Dubowitz “paid himself” nearly twice as much as his think-tank peers, the FDD is linked to Israel’s Likud Party and a Republican donor with financial ties to the Emirates provided $2.7 million to fund an anti-Qatar conference.

None of those things are true.

The Times issued a lengthy correction that explains a board of directors determined Dubowitz’s compensation, which is on par with other think-tank leaders, the FDD is not directly involved with the Likud Party and donor Elliott Broidy gave $360,000 for the conference.

“What's left after the corrections is a dispatch about a think-tank exec with no genuine public-policy power who originally opposed the Iran deal, thought he could convince Trump to mend it without ending it, and is now getting flak from fever-swamp leftists who didn't like his original opposition,” Media Research Center contributing editor Tom Blumer wrote. “Why was this even a story in the first place?”

That paper is filled with leftist hate mongers with no rudder to steer them clear of embarrassing themselves. They are Pravda.

Hey, remember that time when the NYT issued an apology right after Trump was elected...

To Our Readers, From the Publisher and Executive Editor

Nov. 13, 2016

And they actually published this...

Quote:As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.

lololololol...