CSNbbs

Full Version: Metoo shreds the "resistance"
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/h...esistance/

Every time Hillary accused DJT of mysoginy it made me seethe.


"The steady drumbeat of sexual scandal is eroding the Left’s moral authority.
In 2016, the Democrats made a significant mistake in opposing Donald Trump: They framed their opposition to Trump in moral terms, but failed to provide a better alternative. In 2017 and 2018, they’re making the same mistake again, adopting an attitude of moral superiority in spite of obvious evidence to the contrary.
The Left’s failure in the presidential election was glaringly obvious. You claim Trump is dishonest? So is Hillary Clinton. You claim that Trump’s financial dealings are shady? Let’s walk through Whitewater, cattle futures, and the Clinton Foundation. Trump is a predator? Voters who lived through the 1990s remember “bimbo eruptions,” Monica Lewinsky, a rape allegation, and a wife who consistently covered for her husband’s horrible behavior. The Clintons were a package deal, and that deal included a legacy of tawdry, shocking sexual scandal.

Hillary centered her entire campaign on the notion that Trump was a bad person. She was the worst candidate to make that argument. But when 2016 entered history, so did she. Her book tours and headline-grabbing gaffes notwithstanding, she’s largely yesterday’s news. The #Resistance, on the other hand, is fresh. And it has the moral authority that Hillary lacked. It can speak clearly about “norms” and “values.” It can condemn Trump’s multiple moral failings in the strongest possible terms, unencumbered by all that Clinton baggage.
At least until #MeToo.
I truly don’t think the Left understands how the relentless drumbeat of sexual scandal looks to Americans outside the progressive bubble. Left-dominated quarters of American life — Hollywood, the media, progressive politics — have been revealed to be havens for the worst sort of ghouls, and each scandal seems to be accompanied by two words that deepen American cynicism and make legions of conservative Americans roll their eyes at the Left’s moral arguments: “Everyone knew.”
Justice has a way of revealing truth, and for the Left, that truth is hard to face: In the battle for American hearts, it has lost the standing to make its moral case.
Let’s put this in the clearest possible terms: For years, as Hollywood positioned itself as America’s conscience and as the media lauded its commitment to “social justice,” it was harboring, protecting, and indeed promoting truly dreadful human beings as leaders and taste-makers. Progressive politicians who proclaimed support for women’s rights on Twitter were groping women on airplanes or punching them in the bedroom.
All this was happening at the precise time that the dominanant argument — particularly against social conservatism — was that “you people are haters and bigots.” It’s difficult to overstate the extent to which conservative Americans have felt scolded and hectored. So how do you expect us to react when it’s revealed that all too many of the self-appointed moralists weren’t just the kind of preachers who’d run off with the secretary, they were the kind of monsters who’d press a button in their office, lock the secretary in the room, and assault her?


And again, people knew...."
Old timers remember the hash tag as the pound sign.

So if you read it that way this #metoo

is read pound me too!

05-nono
I agree with the article 100% and have said similar many times.

The hypocrisy of the left... not the members of the left, many of whom I believe to be the very 'justice' warriors they wish to be, but the political leadership of the left... acting as if they are somehow better than those on the right. It's a losing proposition because it's not a relative comparison... it's an absolute.

Trump is bad... so is Hillary... but Trump is worse... Really? In what way with regard to things that matter to/impact me directly? Now all of a sudden we're talking about issues and not identities.

All one has to do is watch these 23 and me type commercials and their popularity to realize that very few people actually identify as a single ethnicity, nor do they share a lot of values merely because they share a sexual orientation or gender (or gender identity). The left once gained significant power by appealing to the issues that appealed to minorities as a whole... NOW they're trying to appeal to each minority individually... and those ideas and ideals are often conflicting. You can't give 'special treatment' to ethnic and sexual and religious and gender and.. and.. and.. and still claim that it's special and/or not alienate enough 'majorities' within those sub-groups (like a gay white male) that would have otherwise supported you that you lose many elections. The number of people who support a single group, and that group almost to the exclusion of others is a meaningful and vocal number. As an example, CUSA NEWS and TILB both lean hard left, but you'd have a tough time finding them supporting the same policies (to any great mutual degree).

Said differently... The juxtaposition in support for poor blacks vs whites is unreal. If the policies of the left really favored the poor, they should 'own' poor whites as well... but they don't. The charge is always that poor white people are just stupid then and voting against their own best interests in favor of racism or some other highly charged and divisive claim... which often loses some democrats who otherwise honestly support the plight of the poor. I'm not saying those people vote R, I'm just saying they stay home or vote for Bernie
Bill Clinton being a rapist (IMO) also.....
(05-17-2018 10:00 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]I agree with the article 100% and have said similar many times.

The hypocrisy of the left... not the members of the left, many of whom I believe to be the very 'justice' warriors they wish to be, but the political leadership of the left... acting as if they are somehow better than those on the right. It's a losing proposition because it's not a relative comparison... it's an absolute.

Trump is bad... so is Hillary... but Trump is worse... Really? In what way with regard to things that matter to/impact me directly? Now all of a sudden we're talking about issues and not identities.

All one has to do is watch these 23 and me type commercials and their popularity to realize that very few people actually identify as a single ethnicity, nor do they share a lot of values merely because they share a sexual orientation or gender (or gender identity). The left once gained significant power by appealing to the issues that appealed to minorities as a whole... NOW they're trying to appeal to each minority individually... and those ideas and ideals are often conflicting. You can't give 'special treatment' to ethnic and sexual and religious and gender and.. and.. and.. and still claim that it's special and/or not alienate enough 'majorities' within those sub-groups (like a gay white male) that would have otherwise supported you that you lose many elections. The number of people who support a single group, and that group almost to the exclusion of others is a meaningful and vocal number. As an example, CUSA NEWS and TILB both lean hard left, but you'd have a tough time finding them supporting the same policies (to any great mutual degree).

Said differently... The juxtaposition in support for poor blacks vs whites is unreal. If the policies of the left really favored the poor, they should 'own' poor whites as well... but they don't. The charge is always that poor white people are just stupid then and voting against their own best interests in favor of racism or some other highly charged and divisive claim... which often loses some democrats who otherwise honestly support the plight of the poor. I'm not saying those people vote R, I'm just saying they stay home or vote for Bernie

I believe that the arrogance and condescending attitudes of the left drove most of the late deciding voters either over to Trump -or- they decided to stay home...
You mean men with power and money use it to................have sex with lots of women?

[Image: 1409677380522]
Reference URL's