'M' = military?
Did President Trump negotiate a better deal for the military, knowing he would siphon funds off for the wall? Are we experiencing dimensions of chess that shouldn't even be possible?
![[Image: cLWOH3MXkVqDI6b6ft0S-iLbBVs9kLqMNVbouG6M...4fcd5357fc]](https://i.redditmedia.com/cLWOH3MXkVqDI6b6ft0S-iLbBVs9kLqMNVbouG6MzAc.png?w=640&s=d1e6a116b828ad116926ab4fcd5357fc)
Quote:Trump suggests the military might build the border wall
Trump, who has said a wall is necessary to keep drugs and illegal immigrants from flowing over the border, suggested in his remarks that he would use the military to erect the barrier as part of a “national defense” strategy.
“I want to address the situation on border security, which I call national defense. I call it stopping drugs from pouring across our border. And I call it illegal immigration. It’s all of those things,” he said at the White House signing ceremony. “But national defense is a very important two words. Because by having a strong border system, including a wall, we are in a position, militarily, that is very advantageous. ”
Trump’s nod to military involvement is significant because among the omnibus bill’s military funding is $654.6 billion to continue the global fight against terrorism.
The president has been working with the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Homeland Security to build the wall.
https://nypost.com/2018/03/25/trump-sugg...rder-wall/
Clever bastard. He just punked the entire DNC. The thing is, Mexico isn't chipping in. That's the only flaw in his plan.
I don't think the DNC still has any clue on how to counterpunch Trump. He can be defeated, but I have to admit I'm laughing while watching these guys try to play "politics" with a businessman.
I posted a couple of links to what the ominbus really meant but the traitorous democrats and the "vichy" republicans want to have a reason to scream at the sky. yall gots to read, i cant hold your hands. lol
![[Image: LoneNeighboringLamb-max-1mb.gif]](https://thumbs.gfycat.com/LoneNeighboringLamb-max-1mb.gif)
*IF* it turns out he just funded the wall in this completely irrational and horrendous Omnibus with 60% of the support coming from dems Trump may have just salvaged the midterms for republicans.
(03-25-2018 04:52 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]'M' = military?
Did President Trump negotiate a better deal for the military, knowing he would siphon funds off for the wall? Are we experiencing dimensions of chess that shouldn't even be possible?
Quote:Trump suggests the military might build the border wall
Trump, who has said a wall is necessary to keep drugs and illegal immigrants from flowing over the border, suggested in his remarks that he would use the military to erect the barrier as part of a “national defense” strategy.
“I want to address the situation on border security, which I call national defense. I call it stopping drugs from pouring across our border. And I call it illegal immigration. It’s all of those things,” he said at the White House signing ceremony. “But national defense is a very important two words. Because by having a strong border system, including a wall, we are in a position, militarily, that is very advantageous. ”
Trump’s nod to military involvement is significant because among the omnibus bill’s military funding is $654.6 billion to continue the global fight against terrorism.
The president has been working with the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Homeland Security to build the wall.
https://nypost.com/2018/03/25/trump-sugg...rder-wall/
If this is indeed true and he builds the wall thru the military, it will go down as being the most brilliant example of being crazy like a fox in history.
Can't wait to see the left's collective heads explode like Mars Attacks!
The defense industry is not going like that.
MAN THIS IS GREAT!!! THAT DESERVES A
Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
(03-26-2018 01:39 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha
(03-26-2018 01:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:39 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha
They did not fund a wall. They funded fencing and levees.
(03-26-2018 02:14 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:39 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha
They did not fund a wall. They funded fencing and levees.
At least for the moment, that seems to be up for debate.
(03-26-2018 02:27 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 02:14 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:39 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha
They did not fund a wall. They funded fencing and levees.
At least for the moment, that seems to be up for debate.
Using the military is up for debate. The bill states none of prototype designs can be used.
(03-26-2018 02:32 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 02:27 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 02:14 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:39 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha
They did not fund a wall. They funded fencing and levees.
At least for the moment, that seems to be up for debate.
Using the military is up for debate. The bill states none of prototype designs can be used.
did you get that from the huffpo too?
(03-26-2018 01:39 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
If this truly happens...
Holy schit. Schmucky may have a coronary right on the floor of the senate.
Not to let the good be the enemy of the perfect, but perfect would be if he could siphon the funds from the other “side” of the ledger.
As in, some of the wasteful porkulous social engineering funds that had to be agreed to.
Then we’d be cooking with gas!
Sarah Sanders
Verified account @PressSec
.@POTUS talked w/ @SpeakerRyan & @SenateMajLdr about priorities secured in the omnibus, which all support, especially more $ to rebuild military (largest pay raise for troops in decade),
more than 100 miles of new border wall, $ to fight opioid crisis & rebuild our infrastructure
gotta build 100 before you can build 200.
(03-26-2018 02:32 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 02:27 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 02:14 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (03-26-2018 01:39 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever thought Trump would get 60 democrats to sign a bill funding the border wall
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha
They did not fund a wall. They funded fencing and levees.
At least for the moment, that seems to be up for debate.
Using the military is up for debate. The bill states none of prototype designs can be used.
So they alter one in some form or fashion, stamp it “approved” and off we go.
Get the dozers and backhoes moving, let the Sierra club and other Marxist groups file their endless lawsuits as the wall goes up.
Be a lot tougher to mandate and fund taking it down...
(03-25-2018 06:42 PM)oliveandblue Wrote: [ -> ]Clever bastard. He just punked the entire DNC. The thing is, Mexico isn't chipping in. That's the only flaw in his plan.
I don't think the DNC still has any clue on how to counterpunch Trump. He can be defeated, but I have to admit I'm laughing while watching these guys try to play "politics" with a businessman.
Well---money is fungible. Depending on how well his renegotiation of NAFTA goes---they well may effectively be paying for much or all of it....one way or the other.