https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/05/ex-trump...poena.html
WTF. This guy is risking jail over something minor. He's refusing to cooperate with the special counsel. He's upset that he's going to have to spend 30 hours going over emails. LOL. His little meltdown will ensure that he'll spend a lot of time and money dealing with this.
This guy is dumb as a box of rocks. He's all over TV right now incriminating just about everyone. He's apparently harboring a huge chip on his shoulder over a tiff with Corey Lewindowski.
My God, this is comedy Gold. Turn on CNN to watch the meltdown.
OMG, he just directly accused Trump of colluding in the Trump Tower meeting. Called Carter Page a scumbag, and accused him of colluding with the Russians. Now he's throwing Ben Carson under the bus.
Where in God's name did Trump find these morons. Jaw droppingly stupid. Oh yea, his daddy worked for the Trump organization.
Specifically what Mueller wants is every single communication email among Trump and pretty much everyone that worked on the campaign, or at the WH. And there is no collusion with Russia. Disgusting. Pretty much as baseless as the FISA crap.
(03-05-2018 04:17 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ]Specifically what Mueller wants is every single communication email among Trump and pretty much everyone that worked on the campaign, or at the WH. And there is no collusion with Russia. Disgusting. Pretty much as baseless as the FISA crap.
LOL. 30 hours going through emails is too much to ask? LOL. Heck I spent longer than that collecting data on a random lawsuit between 2 entities I didn't work for that I was about 20th derivatively involved with. And I wasn't even subpenoed.
This guy is nuts. But he certainly is blabbing. Wow.
(03-05-2018 04:21 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:17 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ]Specifically what Mueller wants is every single communication email among Trump and pretty much everyone that worked on the campaign, or at the WH. And there is no collusion with Russia. Disgusting. Pretty much as baseless as the FISA crap.
LOL. 30 hours going through emails is too much to ask? LOL. Heck I spent longer than that collecting data on a random lawsuit that I was about 20th derivatively involved with.
He was claiming 80 hours on interview with Katy Tur, which i think is absurd amount.
(03-05-2018 04:21 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:17 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ]Specifically what Mueller wants is every single communication email among Trump and pretty much everyone that worked on the campaign, or at the WH. And there is no collusion with Russia. Disgusting. Pretty much as baseless as the FISA crap.
LOL. 30 hours going through emails is too much to ask? LOL. Heck I spent longer than that collecting data on a random lawsuit that I was about 20th derivatively involved with.
Why should he have to? There is no probable cause to suggest crimes happened. Nothing more than a "legal" hack of their emails, an no probable cause. And you dam well Mueller will leak all kinds of emails to the media.
(03-05-2018 04:22 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:21 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:17 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ]Specifically what Mueller wants is every single communication email among Trump and pretty much everyone that worked on the campaign, or at the WH. And there is no collusion with Russia. Disgusting. Pretty much as baseless as the FISA crap.
LOL. 30 hours going through emails is too much to ask? LOL. Heck I spent longer than that collecting data on a random lawsuit that I was about 20th derivatively involved with.
He was claiming 80 hours on interview with Katy Tur, which i think is absurd amount.
Have any of y'all ever been involved in litigation? Heck, even for a stupid open and shut case relating to a credit dispute, it usually would take me off the floor for half a week.
Lets just shut down the investigation because Nunberg doesn't want to spend some time parsing emails.
(03-05-2018 04:25 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:21 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:17 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ]Specifically what Mueller wants is every single communication email among Trump and pretty much everyone that worked on the campaign, or at the WH. And there is no collusion with Russia. Disgusting. Pretty much as baseless as the FISA crap.
LOL. 30 hours going through emails is too much to ask? LOL. Heck I spent longer than that collecting data on a random lawsuit that I was about 20th derivatively involved with.
Why should he have to? There is no probable cause to suggest crimes happened. Nothing more than a "legal" hack of their emails, an no probable cause. And you dam well Mueller will leak all kinds of emails to the media.
He won't be leaking them, but introducing them into evidence in court documents, if they are relevant.
He should have to because Mueller has decided he needs to see them. Remember that his boy Roger Stone telegraphed a hack of Podesta, when only those that illegally stole the emails would have known that they existed.
Yeah, he probably should comply with a grand jury subpoena. He can tell the Grand Jury how ridiculous the whole thing is just like he is the reporters.
Probably won't turn out well for him.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
(03-05-2018 04:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Remember that his boy Roger Stone telegraphed a hack of Podesta, when only those that illegally stole the emails would have known that they existed.
I know that you can't think straight right now (just like when the Brian Ross fake news hit, and you and the rest of the unhinged alt-left mistakenly thought that you finally "got him"), but this has been debunked as fake news.
Please retract and disavow.
(03-05-2018 04:36 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:33 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Remember that his boy Roger Stone telegraphed a hack of Podesta, when only those that illegally stole the emails would have known that they existed.
I know that you can't think straight right now (just like when the Brian Ross fake news hit, and you and the rest of the unhinged alt-left mistakenly thought that you finally "got him"), but this has been debunked as fake news.
Please retract and disavow.
Nope. http://theweek.com/speedreads/740483/rog...k-know-how
11/30/2017 from whatever tf the week dot com is.
Please try and keep up. DMs came out last week between Stone and Wikileaks, and Wikileaks said that his "false claim of association" was being used by the dems to undermine their work. In other words, you're on the trail of a bullsh*ter, but you are so unhinged that you can't see it.
He also posted a picture of his passport showing no foreign trips between 2010-2017, debunking the fake news that he met with Assange in London.
Sad.
Like I said, please retract and disavow.
(03-05-2018 04:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]He won't be leaking them, but introducing them into evidence in court documents, if they are relevant.
He should have to because Mueller has decided he needs to see them. Remember that his boy Roger Stone telegraphed a hack of Podesta, when only those that illegally stole the emails would have known that they existed.
Yeah, unfortunately for your side that isn't the burden of proof... that a prosecutor wants to know... or even your assumption about who would know/what was telegraphed. Ask Hillary, Bill, Ted etc and of course just as many Republicans who redact and/or take the 5th.
I guess now we're supposed to believe that the idiot Trump was so prescient that he fired this guy in 2015, plotted some feigned bad blood, and then hid all the evidence...
EXCEPT EMAILS ABOUT HACKED EMAILS
The fact that you said 30 hours when he said 80 only indicates to me that you know that 80 would be egregious.
and just because you value 'the system' more than he does doesn't make you right and him wrong. I probably wouldn't fight it much either... but that doesn't mean that those that do by definition have something to hide. Maybe they just have contempt for the system, like lots of Americans especially on the left.
(03-05-2018 04:40 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:36 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:33 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Remember that his boy Roger Stone telegraphed a hack of Podesta, when only those that illegally stole the emails would have known that they existed.
I know that you can't think straight right now (just like when the Brian Ross fake news hit, and you and the rest of the unhinged alt-left mistakenly thought that you finally "got him"), but this has been debunked as fake news.
Please retract and disavow.
Nope. http://theweek.com/speedreads/740483/rog...k-know-how
11/30/2017 from whatever tf the week dot com is.
Please try and keep up. DMs came out last week between Stone and Wikileaks, and Wikileaks said that his "false claim of association" was being used by the dems to undermine their work. In other words, you're on the trail of a bullsh*ter, but you are so unhinged that you can't see it.
He also posted a picture of his passport showing no foreign trips between 2010-2017, debunking the fake news that he met with Assange in London.
Sad.
Like I said, please retract and disavow.
Because Roger Stone and WikiLeaks denied it? Nope.
(03-05-2018 04:45 PM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]He won't be leaking them, but introducing them into evidence in court documents, if they are relevant.
He should have to because Mueller has decided he needs to see them. Remember that his boy Roger Stone telegraphed a hack of Podesta, when only those that illegally stole the emails would have known that they existed.
Yeah, unfortunately for your side that isn't the burden of proof... that a prosecutor wants to know... or even your assumption about who would know/what was telegraphed. Ask Hillary, Bill, Ted etc and of course just as many Republicans who redact and/or take the 5th.
I guess now we're supposed to believe that the idiot Trump was so prescient that he fired this guy in 2015, plotted some feigned bad blood, and then hid all the evidence...
EXCEPT EMAILS ABOUT HACKED EMAILS
The fact that you said 30 hours when he said 80 only indicates to me that you know that 80 would be egregious.
and just because you value 'the system' more than he does doesn't make you right and him wrong. I probably wouldn't fight it much either... but that doesn't mean that those that do by definition have something to hide. Maybe they just have contempt for the system, like lots of Americans especially on the left.
On CNN he said 30. 80 isn't egregious in this case (apparently he said 80 over on MSNBC). Heck it isn't even abnormal either in the course of routine legal matters. He's going to spend WEEKS and probably MONTHS dealing with this.
Basically, he's whining because he
1) Is an moron who doesn't understand how legal matters work and actually thinks he can avoid complying simply because he 'wants to avoid doing so'
2) Is really consumed by his hatred of Lewindowski or some sort of perceived loyalty to Stone and Bannon
3) Is really hiding something, and suspects that Mueller just wants to subpenoa his emails for additional evidence against Bannon and/or Stone. Or that there's any number of embarrassing emails in his email.
This guy probably doesn't have a lawyer, and is almost certainly not in compliance with his lawyers' advice if he has one.
Truly Jaw Dropping.
He's now talking to another reporter. My God, he's now revealing the questions that Mueller asked him during his previous interviews. My God, this guy is about dumb as a box of rocks. If I knew him, I'd be physically driving over to his house to try to take away his cell phone so he can't cause himself even more damage
This is going to wipe everything off the news cycle.
(03-05-2018 04:55 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:40 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:36 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:33 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ] (03-05-2018 04:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Remember that his boy Roger Stone telegraphed a hack of Podesta, when only those that illegally stole the emails would have known that they existed.
I know that you can't think straight right now (just like when the Brian Ross fake news hit, and you and the rest of the unhinged alt-left mistakenly thought that you finally "got him"), but this has been debunked as fake news.
Please retract and disavow.
Nope. http://theweek.com/speedreads/740483/rog...k-know-how
11/30/2017 from whatever tf the week dot com is.
Please try and keep up. DMs came out last week between Stone and Wikileaks, and Wikileaks said that his "false claim of association" was being used by the dems to undermine their work. In other words, you're on the trail of a bullsh*ter, but you are so unhinged that you can't see it.
He also posted a picture of his passport showing no foreign trips between 2010-2017, debunking the fake news that he met with Assange in London.
Sad.
Like I said, please retract and disavow.
Because Roger Stone and WikiLeaks denied it? Nope.
We're in a dangerous place when evidence debunks the unhinged alt-left's conspiracy theories, and they so casually disregard it and double down.
Did this guy call trump and idiot? Can't wait to see Trump's twitter response.....
Good grief. Leftists are still hoping for Russian/Trump collusion. There is not even a spec of evidence that such a thing happened. And NO, Mueller doesn't have any or else it would have leaked by now like everything from his office.
If Mueller actually cared about "collusion", he would be looking at Hillary's campaign. They are ones paying Russians and working with Russians to create that idiotic Steele hitpiece. And if he wants to go after someone for selling out America, the Clinton Foundation looks good. C'mon, donations almost entirely dry up the day after the election.
Now, he's on TV saying that Hope Hicks was screwing Corey Lewindowski (in addition to Portman).
Mmmm....popcorn.
Maybe this guy is doing the 'I'm too crazy to go to jail' Vincent Gigante schtick.
Kronke....
Get the F out of here......
Julian Assange is a Russian asset...... are you really going to take his word that Stone was not the contact and be done with it???? Case closed... asaange says you are barking up the wrong tree.... give it up.
![[Image: Q1lr_f-maxage-0.gif]](https://m.popkey.co/4b4bfb/Q1lr_f-maxage-0.gif)