(01-15-2018 09:17 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 09:11 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ]Too bad feeseball is over eh Stinky
Well at least someone can make out enough of his posts to actually respond to him. I generally just ignore his posts because its usually harder to decipher than the Canterbury Tales. Half the time, I have no idea what the hell he's trying to express even after reading his posts multiple times. Usually I don't bother.
I presume feeseball refers to USM football? Serious question and from a person who spent 20+ years living within 100 miles of Hattiesburg. Is there some sort of local creole language there?
then why bother to begin with.....put me on ignore.....
however, I ignore no one.....
was that too complicated???
(01-15-2018 09:23 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 03:44 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]PS. To answer the OP's original question. Chelsea Manning is a traitor who shouldn't be anywhere near the Democratic nomination for US Senate. (Please note I didn't use any pronouns - you can do it too)
I'll be interested to see how your opinion morphs over time, in the unlikely event that zir manning wins the primary.
I have a feeling you're simply betting on it's unlikelihood in your disavowal. If zir was a true threat to win, you'd be dodging the issue.
First of all, I think that Manning is unqualified.
It appears as though the likely Republican nominee, Faddis, is also equally unqualified, as he openly argues for unilateral war with North Korea.
In the unlikely event that Manning wins the primary, I'll sort that out at the time. Perhaps Faddis will not be such a nut. Perhaps the GOP will nominate someone not equally as unfit as Manning.
I'd vote for Jeff Flake over Chelsea Manning. Does that help?
I loathe Assaunge/WikiLeaks. Trust me on that one. People working with them are real traitors.
Either way, its kind of a pointless exercise....Chelsea Manning is not winning the 2018 Democratic Primary for US Senate in Maryland or in any other state.
(01-15-2018 09:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 08:54 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 08:40 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 08:35 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote: [ -> ]Manning is a traitor that should have been executed in front of a firing squad. Nothing would make me happier than to see the Liberal Left embrace this traitorous..confused grandstander.
Anyone who thinks that the Liberal left is going to support Chelsea Manning against Ben Cardin is confused to be sure.
As far as punishment, Manning should receive the same punishment that Snowden will eventually receive.
All I know for sure is Manning is at worse..mentally ill and at best just a confused fool swept up in this current gender swapping fad. Either way?..unfit for office. The rejection of the Left will verify that.
Man, you blew it. With your other post, I thought you wanted to have a real discussion about Manning and Cardin in the Maryland Senate race.
Do you feel that Transgendered persons should be barred from office? Your language makes it seem as if you do.
But to answer the gist of your query...
WHEN the left votes for Cardin, that will have nothing to do with Manning's gender, but the fact that Cardin is a really great Senator and that Manning's felony past is the disqualification.
Don't put words in my mouth Tom. No where have I advocated that Manning or any other mentally deranged fool should be barred from running for office.
BTW.. You are dead wrong on this Tom. You live in a Alphabet vacuum that blinds you to the reality of how the vast majority think. You can damn well believe that Manning's gender confusion is just as much of a turn off as the treasonous behavior. You have no clue as to how the average hetero feels on this subject and if you really think that Liberal hetero's are any different from conservative hetero's on this?...Its YOU that are confused. No one really thinks much of this Trans fad Tom outside of the most uberliberal locales. No one.
(01-15-2018 09:30 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 09:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 08:54 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 08:40 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 08:35 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote: [ -> ]Manning is a traitor that should have been executed in front of a firing squad. Nothing would make me happier than to see the Liberal Left embrace this traitorous..confused grandstander.
Anyone who thinks that the Liberal left is going to support Chelsea Manning against Ben Cardin is confused to be sure.
As far as punishment, Manning should receive the same punishment that Snowden will eventually receive.
All I know for sure is Manning is at worse..mentally ill and at best just a confused fool swept up in this current gender swapping fad. Either way?..unfit for office. The rejection of the Left will verify that.
Man, you blew it. With your other post, I thought you wanted to have a real discussion about Manning and Cardin in the Maryland Senate race.
Do you feel that Transgendered persons should be barred from office? Your language makes it seem as if you do.
But to answer the gist of your query...
WHEN the left votes for Cardin, that will have nothing to do with Manning's gender, but the fact that Cardin is a really great Senator and that Manning's felony past is the disqualification.
Don't put words in my mouth Tom. No where have I advocated that Manning or any other mentally deranged fool should be barred from running for office.
BTW.. You are dead wrong on this Tom. You live in a Alphabet vacuum that blinds you to the reality of how the vast majority think. You can damn well believe that Manning's gender confusion is just as much of a turn off as the treasonous behavior. You have no clue as to how the average hetero feels on this subject and if you really think that Liberal hetero's are any different from conservative hetero's on this?...Its YOU that are confused. No one really thinks much of this Trans fad Tom outside of the most uberliberal locales. No one.
,
Uh, I don't know what else to make of the comment, "All I know for sure is Manning is at worse..mentally ill and at best just a confused fool swept up in this current gender swapping fad. Either way?..unfit for office". You said either way, that appeared, at least to me, to imply that Manning was unfit based solely upon her gender identity.
I'm just taking your words at face value. I don't think I put words in your mouth. Simply took them to their logical conclusion.
Again, you appear to be rather upset about the fact that Transgendered persons are being treated with respect and common courtesy by some in this country. I don't understand the rationale for such hostility, quite frankly. But it is heartening to note that outside of uberliberal locals, like Prince William County Virginia, that qualified Transgender candidates can run for and win election to the state legislature (even unseated a Republican in the process). A Transgendered person will eventually win election to the US Senate. It won't be in Maryland in 2018.
What happened to Tommy's post about the language Stinky and I were talking. Did he remove it because he felt as if it was insensitive? What a shame. See it takes alot to offend me. I don't wear my feelings on my sleeves especially on some internet message board.
(01-15-2018 10:27 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ]What happened to Tommy's post about the language Stinky and I were talking. Did he remove it because he felt as if it was insensitive? What a shame. See it takes alot to offend me. I don't wear my feelings on my sleeves especially on some internet message board.
Some people should not be advocates for their cause. Lol. I'm not pointing any fingers but their name ryhmes with lom
(01-15-2018 10:33 PM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 10:27 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ]What happened to Tommy's post about the language Stinky and I were talking. Did he remove it because he felt as if it was insensitive? What a shame. See it takes alot to offend me. I don't wear my feelings on my sleeves especially on some internet message board.
Some people should not be advocates for their cause. Lol
The difference between someone like Tom and I are this: Tom views ignorance as weak and percieves it as a stumbling block. I view it as a chance to learn and grow. I embrace it. I didn't get to where I was by attempting to be the smartest guy in the room or making others think I was that guy. I was the guy who did the **** jobs and when the 'smart' ones failed, I had learned alot from shoveling to know what not to do. It's a long way to the top if you wanna rock and roll.
(01-15-2018 10:27 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ]What happened to Tommy's post about the language Stinky and I were talking. Did he remove it because he felt as if it was insensitive? What a shame. See it takes alot to offend me. I don't wear my feelings on my sleeves especially on some internet message board.
I was legitimately pointing out that I have difficulty understanding his language, noting that you appeared to use some words that appeared to be some sort of alternative form of language, appeared to understand him, root for the same school, and asked you about it. I asked you and not stinky because I don't understand much of what he writes.
You responded with something that was a bit murky. I responded with something equally murky (but not offensive) but realized that since I did understand you, that it didn't contribute to the conversation. So I pulled it down.
I'll call Manning a She when Science tells me that He is a She. Until then, that pooper pusher should be hung for his crimes.
(01-15-2018 09:23 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 09:17 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 09:11 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ]Too bad feeseball is over eh Stinky
Well at least someone can make out enough of his posts to actually respond to him. I generally just ignore his posts because its usually harder to decipher than the Canterbury Tales. Half the time, I have no idea what the hell he's trying to express even after reading his posts multiple times. Usually I don't bother.
I presume feeseball refers to USM football? Serious question and from a person who spent 20+ years living within 100 miles of Hattiesburg. Is there some sort of local creole language there?
Nope. To understand the Fist of Stink one must be enlightened and not give the furry hind end of small critters.
I understand him clearly. Perhaps he needs a bong hit. I hear they work better than poppers, but be careful not to BLOW out the TRANNYsmission... poetry...
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
(01-16-2018 10:43 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 09:23 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 09:17 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-15-2018 09:11 PM)gdunn Wrote: [ -> ]Too bad feeseball is over eh Stinky
Well at least someone can make out enough of his posts to actually respond to him. I generally just ignore his posts because its usually harder to decipher than the Canterbury Tales. Half the time, I have no idea what the hell he's trying to express even after reading his posts multiple times. Usually I don't bother.
I presume feeseball refers to USM football? Serious question and from a person who spent 20+ years living within 100 miles of Hattiesburg. Is there some sort of local creole language there?
Nope. To understand the Fist of Stink one must be enlightened and not give the furry hind end of small critters.
I understand him clearly. Perhaps he needs a bong hit. I hear they work better than poppers, but be careful not to BLOW out the TRANNYsmission... poetry...
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
I'd ship ol' boy a G, but that RICO thingy continues to be a dilly dilly.....
ol' tommy goons needs to develop a sense of humor or a plausible economic platform to be taken seriously....
'right' now, the dippos are deservedly getting their nuts roasted over an open fire....
#henceDJT
(01-16-2018 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ]I'll call Manning a She when Science tells me that He is a She. Until then, that pooper pusher should be hung for his crimes.
Even for you, that post was an amazing combination of fail for such a short post.
I seriously doubt the term 'pooper pusher' would apply to Ms Manning.
But to your other allegation. It appears that science has spoken. And medical associations, representing 450,000 licensed medical professionals agrees with Chelsea Manning in her identification as female.
Now, there is another 'medical' group, which has about 450 members, not all of which are licensed medical doctors, that says otherwise.
450,000 to 450 agree with Ms Manning. Science is telling you that Chelsea Manning is a she. You just aren't listening.
And I thought you guys didn't defer to science anyway.
(01-16-2018 11:16 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 11:15 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ]I'll call Manning a She when Science tells me that He is a She. Until then, that pooper pusher should be hung for his crimes.
I seriously doubt the term 'pooper pusher' would apply to Ms Manning.
But to your other allegation. It appears that science has spoken. And medical associations, representing 450,000 licensed medical professionals agrees with Chelsea Manning in her identification as female.
Now, there is another 'medical' group, which has about 450 members, not all of which are licensed medical doctors, that says otherwise.
450,000 to 450 agree with Ms Manning.
And I thought you guys didn't defer to science anyway.
How about fudge packer? 
Think about it for a minute. Think about it.
Either way, science has spoken. In favor of Ms. Manning.
(01-16-2018 11:15 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ]I'll call Manning a She when Science tells me that He is a She. Until then, that pooper pusher should be hung for his crimes.
Even for you, that post was an amazing combination of fail for such a short post.
I seriously doubt the term 'pooper pusher' would apply to Ms Manning.
But to your other allegation. It appears that science has spoken. And medical associations, representing 450,000 licensed medical professionals agrees with Chelsea Manning in her identification as female.
Now, there is another 'medical' group, which has about 450 members, not all of which are licensed medical doctors, that says otherwise.
450,000 to 450 agree with Ms Manning. Science is telling you that Chelsea Manning is a she. You just aren't listening.
And I thought you guys didn't defer to science anyway.
Did the 450k medical professionals vote on a resolution? Were they polled? How do you know they are resprented?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
(01-16-2018 11:22 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 11:15 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ]I'll call Manning a She when Science tells me that He is a She. Until then, that pooper pusher should be hung for his crimes.
Even for you, that post was an amazing combination of fail for such a short post.
I seriously doubt the term 'pooper pusher' would apply to Ms Manning.
But to your other allegation. It appears that science has spoken. And medical associations, representing 450,000 licensed medical professionals agrees with Chelsea Manning in her identification as female.
Now, there is another 'medical' group, which has about 450 members, not all of which are licensed medical doctors, that says otherwise.
450,000 to 450 agree with Ms Manning. Science is telling you that Chelsea Manning is a she. You just aren't listening.
And I thought you guys didn't defer to science anyway.
Did the 450k medical professionals vote on a resolution? Were they polled? How do you know they are resprented?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Do you? I'll let you look it up.
Says he's done derailing the thread, continues to post in said derailed the thread. - Tom in Troll-ybrook logic
(01-16-2018 11:26 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 11:22 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 11:15 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2018 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ]I'll call Manning a She when Science tells me that He is a She. Until then, that pooper pusher should be hung for his crimes.
Even for you, that post was an amazing combination of fail for such a short post.
I seriously doubt the term 'pooper pusher' would apply to Ms Manning.
But to your other allegation. It appears that science has spoken. And medical associations, representing 450,000 licensed medical professionals agrees with Chelsea Manning in her identification as female.
Now, there is another 'medical' group, which has about 450 members, not all of which are licensed medical doctors, that says otherwise.
450,000 to 450 agree with Ms Manning. Science is telling you that Chelsea Manning is a she. You just aren't listening.
And I thought you guys didn't defer to science anyway.
Did the 450k medical professionals vote on a resolution? Were they polled? How do you know they are resprented?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Do you?
I didn't make the claim, you did.
My next door neighbor is a medical professional and member of the AMA and says it is bunch of BS. Seems they aren't representing his viewpoint on this issue
I guess it is possible, due to my neighbor, they actually represent 449,999 medical professionals, but I doubt it.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
