https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/...5762ecdd47
Their attacks on Sanders rank with those on Melania's shoes. The pie, the complaints about asking what the press was thankful about, her weight.
Nothing generates attacks like being conservative, female and successful, except maybe being conservative and Black and successful.
Huh, almost like the WaPo isn't a mindlessly pro-liberal bastion of fake news? Nah, that's only claimed when they're reporting on one of the many things that makes conservatives look bad.
LOL
If I posted a picture of pelosi right now, you hypocrites would go crazy with jokes and insults. It's always funny when you guys try to claim your fake high ground.
I'm fine admitting that I've seen people treating Sanders unfairly for her looks, and that shouldn't be tolerated. Petty a$$holes exist in all political ideologies, but acting as if the political party which pushes for virtually every single women's rights issue is waging a war on women because of some immature comments towards conservative women is downright ludicrous. The WaPo can criticize others for this, anyone who voted for Mr ***** Grabber himself really can't.
Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
(11-28-2017 12:35 PM)cb4029 Wrote: [ -> ]LOL
If I posted a picture of pelosi right now, you hypocrites would go crazy with jokes and insults. It's always funny when you guys try to claim your fake high ground.
We are using your rules against you. We don't claim the high ground.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
(11-28-2017 12:56 PM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 12:35 PM)cb4029 Wrote: [ -> ]LOL
If I posted a picture of pelosi right now, you hypocrites would go crazy with jokes and insults. It's always funny when you guys try to claim your fake high ground.
We are using your rules against you. We don't claim the high ground.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
I hold more intelligent people to a higher standard too.
(11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Go back and find the one where you said you are going to quit the room if Hillary loses...
(11-28-2017 01:11 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Go back and find the one where you said you are going to quit the room if Hillary loses...
If only you held the sitting POTUS to nearly the standard that you hold a messageboard moderator to.
I think the lefties in this thread are engaging in whataboutism. Didn't they say that was a no-no.
Point out what you want about the other side mocking certain women's appearances. While rude,the other side isn't being hypocritical.
It's the left that has forged the PC road. And it's the left that gets perturbed when being called for running off that road.
(11-28-2017 01:28 PM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ]I think the lefties in this thread are engaging in whataboutism. Didn't they say that was a no-no.
Point out what you want about the other side mocking certain women's appearances. While rude,the other side isn't being hypocritical.
It's the left that has forged the PC road. And it's the left that gets perturbed when being called for running off that road.
Those attacking her are hypocritical, but that does not mean the entirety of the left must sit on their hands and not point out when the criticism comes from those who support Mr Pussygrabber himself.
(11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Only if you can translate them into Welsh.
(11-28-2017 01:48 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:28 PM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ]I think the lefties in this thread are engaging in whataboutism. Didn't they say that was a no-no.
Point out what you want about the other side mocking certain women's appearances. While rude,the other side isn't being hypocritical.
It's the left that has forged the PC road. And it's the left that gets perturbed when being called for running off that road.
Those attacking her are hypocritical, but that does not mean the entirety of the left must sit on their hands and not point out when the criticism comes from those who support Mr Pussygrabber himself.
It means they need to focus on their own given that this entire thing has backfired on them.
Make the other side live up to their own set of rules.
Where have I heard that before?
(11-28-2017 01:50 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Only if you can translate them into Welsh.
If only you held your POTUS to the same standard you hold this messageboard moderator.
(11-28-2017 01:57 PM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:48 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:28 PM)umbluegray Wrote: [ -> ]I think the lefties in this thread are engaging in whataboutism. Didn't they say that was a no-no.
Point out what you want about the other side mocking certain women's appearances. While rude,the other side isn't being hypocritical.
It's the left that has forged the PC road. And it's the left that gets perturbed when being called for running off that road.
Those attacking her are hypocritical, but that does not mean the entirety of the left must sit on their hands and not point out when the criticism comes from those who support Mr Pussygrabber himself.
It means they need to focus on their own given that this entire thing has backfired on them.
Make the other side live up to their own set of rules.
Where have I heard that before?
"This entire thing" meaning what?
And you're commenting on a WaPo Op-Ed about this right now, so it's hard to take your criticism seriously as the only reason we're talking about it is because the left is bringing it up to criticize their own.
(11-28-2017 01:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:50 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Only if you can translate them into Welsh.
If only you held your POTUS to the same standard you hold this messageboard moderator.
It just shows that, for Kaplony, online sports forum bet welshing is a bigger threat to society than the POTUS being a lying sexual predator.
We all have our moral rankings. That's just his.
(11-28-2017 02:02 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:50 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Only if you can translate them into Welsh.
If only you held your POTUS to the same standard you hold this messageboard moderator.
It just shows that, for Kaplony, online sports forum bet welshing is a bigger threat to society than the POTUS being a lying sexual predator.
We all have our moral rankings. That's just his.
We survived the only proven lying sexual predator in the White House, we'll survive the theoretical boogeyman in your post as well.
Can't say the same about your reputation, and I look at it as providing a public service to any newcomers to the board that they can't believe a word that you type. You chose to renege on the agreed upon terms of your bet, you reap the consequences. There's a way you can stop it. Leave the Spin Room forever like you agreed to do. Until then mwynhau'r daith
(11-28-2017 02:11 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 02:02 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:50 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Only if you can translate them into Welsh.
If only you held your POTUS to the same standard you hold this messageboard moderator.
It just shows that, for Kaplony, online sports forum bet welshing is a bigger threat to society than the POTUS being a lying sexual predator.
We all have our moral rankings. That's just his.
We survived the only proven lying sexual predator in the White House, we'll survive the theoretical boogeyman in your post as well.
Can't say the same about your reputation, and I look at it as providing a public service to any newcomers to the board that they can't believe a word that you type. You chose to renege on the agreed upon terms of your bet, you reap the consequences. There's a way you can stop it. Leave the Spin Room forever like you agreed to do. Until then mwynhau'r daith
So you hold a messageboard moderator to a higher standard than the POTUS? Or do I need to list any number of comparing promises and personal promises he's reneged on?
(11-28-2017 12:25 PM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/...5762ecdd47
Their attacks on Sanders rank with those on Melania's shoes. The pie, the complaints about asking what the press was thankful about, her weight.
Nothing generates attacks like being conservative, female and successful, except maybe being conservative and Black and successful.
This from the person who referred to the first lade as "Mooschelle" for 8 years?
Oh the hypocracy.
(11-28-2017 01:17 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 01:11 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2017 12:54 PM)JDTulane Wrote: [ -> ]Do I need to pull up any number of Lena Dunham/HRC/Warren/etc. mock threads? Clutch your hypocrisy pearls somewhere else.
Go back and find the one where you said you are going to quit the room if Hillary loses...
If only you held the sitting POTUS to nearly the standard that you hold a messageboard moderator to.
If only he had some honor before demanding it from others..... But what do you think of this whole thing UCF08
Convinced that the dems in power are just as scummy as trump yet?