(10-30-2017 04:49 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]The alt-left, ladies and gentlemen (and zirs). These are the arguments that are going to win them back the House in 2018.
Xe ought to pass those out at muh field offices...
(10-30-2017 04:49 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]The alt-left, ladies and gentlemen (and zirs). These are the arguments that are going to win them back the House in 2018.
Heartwarming and something all voters can relate to. You dam freak
(10-30-2017 04:49 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]The alt-left, ladies and gentlemen (and zirs). These are the arguments that are going to win them back the House in 2018.
(10-30-2017 04:49 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]The alt-left, ladies and gentlemen (and zirs). These are the arguments that are going to win them back the House in 2018.
Heartwarming and something all voters can relate to. You dam freak
(10-30-2017 04:49 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]The alt-left, ladies and gentlemen (and zirs). These are the arguments that are going to win them back the House in 2018.
Heartwarming and something all voters can relate to. You dam freak
(10-30-2017 03:20 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]That was art? Dang, and to think I've been flushing mine down the toilet especially at night after I go to bed. A real Picasso I am, er, could be.
(10-30-2017 03:20 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]That was art? Dang, and to think I've been flushing mine down the toilet especially at night after I go to bed. A real Picasso I am, er, could be.
(10-30-2017 04:49 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]The alt-left, ladies and gentlemen (and zirs). These are the arguments that are going to win them back the House in 2018.
Heartwarming and something all voters can relate to. You dam freak
(10-30-2017 04:49 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]The alt-left, ladies and gentlemen (and zirs). These are the arguments that are going to win them back the House in 2018.
Heartwarming and something all voters can relate to. You dam freak
Your signature... Can't. Stop. Drooling. Staring.
Yes sir
lmao at a trans thread that came with more booty.....
Well, if you can't justify your vote based on policy then I guess you need to create a unrealistically terrible caricature of your opponent to justify it.
(10-30-2017 04:35 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]Well, if you can't justify your vote based on policy then I guess you need to create a unrealistically terrible caricature of your opponent to justify it.
I would decry the blatant partisanship of the SCOTUS appointments, and the willingness to abuse the rules in order to gain a political advantage. But then again, I'm more worried about the health of our Republic than winning a SCOTUS seat.
(10-30-2017 04:35 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]Well, if you can't justify your vote based on policy then I guess you need to create a unrealistically terrible caricature of your opponent to justify it.
The irony here is so thick I am cutting it and serving it with a nice Chianti.
(10-30-2017 04:35 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]Well, if you can't justify your vote based on policy then I guess you need to create a unrealistically terrible caricature of your opponent to justify it.
The irony here is so thick I am cutting it and serving it with a nice Chianti.
(10-30-2017 04:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I would decry the blatant partisanship of the SCOTUS appointments, and the willingness to abuse the rules in order to gain a political advantage. But then again, I'm more worried about the health of our Republic than winning a SCOTUS seat.
If you are worried about the health of our Republic then you should be overjoyed at the blocked Garland appointment and the resulting seating of Gorsuch as Gorsuch is a Constitutional originalist instead of a judicial activist. The only thing assuring the continued life of our Republic is the very document that created it, and the only way to protect it is to purge our judicial system of the activists looking to legislate from the bench and neuter the very foundation of our nation in the process.
(10-30-2017 04:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I would decry the blatant partisanship of the SCOTUS appointments, and the willingness to abuse the rules in order to gain a political advantage. But then again, I'm more worried about the health of our Republic than winning a SCOTUS seat.
If you are worried about the health of our Republic then you should be overjoyed at the blocked Garland appointment and the resulting seating of Gorsuch as Gorsuch is a Constitutional originalist instead of a judicial activist. The only thing assuring the continued life of our Republic is the very document that created it, and the only way to protect it is to purge our judicial system of the activists looking to legislate from the bench and neuter the very foundation of our nation in the process.
What rulings, specifically, would you like to see changed?
![[Image: 85445142.gif]](http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2363319/85445142.gif)