(09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:09 AM)TU4ever Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:49 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote: [ -> ]Those are all top 6 AAC games versus bottom of other G5 conferences. You were favored in all games, and did the expected 6-0. The Tulsa @Toledo game should be a better gauge of power.
Air Force and maybe UNM or MARSHALL are the only other upper half G5 matchups.
We have lost two games against the g4 in over two years. There is a clear seperation.
Tulsa's defense is out of sync and looking bad right now. They're still going to win vs toledo. I was thinking 7-14 points. It'll be a shoot out and I am thinking tulsa wins by 4.
Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...
So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
(09-10-2017 12:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:09 AM)TU4ever Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:49 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote: [ -> ]Those are all top 6 AAC games versus bottom of other G5 conferences. You were favored in all games, and did the expected 6-0. The Tulsa @Toledo game should be a better gauge of power.
Air Force and maybe UNM or MARSHALL are the only other upper half G5 matchups.
We have lost two games against the g4 in over two years. There is a clear seperation.
Tulsa's defense is out of sync and looking bad right now. They're still going to win vs toledo. I was thinking 7-14 points. It'll be a shoot out and I am thinking tulsa wins by 4.
Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...
So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
You mean like Memphis, Navy, and UCF?
(09-10-2017 01:13 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 12:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:09 AM)TU4ever Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:49 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote: [ -> ]Those are all top 6 AAC games versus bottom of other G5 conferences. You were favored in all games, and did the expected 6-0. The Tulsa @Toledo game should be a better gauge of power.
Air Force and maybe UNM or MARSHALL are the only other upper half G5 matchups.
We have lost two games against the g4 in over two years. There is a clear seperation.
Tulsa's defense is out of sync and looking bad right now. They're still going to win vs toledo. I was thinking 7-14 points. It'll be a shoot out and I am thinking tulsa wins by 4.
Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...
So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
You mean like Memphis, Navy, and UCF?
On any given Saturday a lessor team can win. It's the entire body of work that matters. The top of the AAC has to deal with several more teams that can beat within the conference then the MW does.
For example, middle of the pack New Mexico plays Boise this week. What are the chances of an upset? It's not even measurable. Boise gets to take a week off, try different things they might not try otherwise, and then ultimately rest there starters for most of the second half. That is quite a luxury.
Six of the remaining 10 games for SDST will be just as easy for them. SDST also has the luxury of practising and playing in good weather at home nearly 100% of the time. Most of the AAC teams do not have that luxury. It's a nice recruiting advantage as well. For this reason, I really wish it worked out that SDST was in the AAC.
(09-10-2017 11:57 AM)TU4ever Wrote: [ -> ]Slowly coming back to reality I see fanhood, good for you keep working at it.
Can anyone off the top of their head tell me what the PAC's bowl record was two years ago? Big xii? Bowls are fun, but other than ny6 and playoffs no one pays attention to them. Players take them off, coaches leave. Regular season doesn't have any of that, its a flat equal best vs best on the field and in the booth.
Last I checked neither army or byu is in a conference and they for sure aren't in the G4.
I would like to take your assesment of teams and conferences seriously, but you picked fau to win vs Navy and that games outcome showed how biased your opinion is.
The MWC just lost its one shot at the ny6 bowl with boise going down. Even short games the AAC has the inside track now.
Along with several of the reasons you gave for potential different results in bowl season versus regular season is the weather. Most bowl games are played is nicer climates then "real" football weather of cold, ice, and snow. Weather is one reason that fewer QBs then expected make it in the NFL. Many of those QBs typically are not cold (NFL) weather type QBs. Who ever heard of 75 degree weather as football weather?
(09-10-2017 11:02 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:54 AM)sfink16 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:50 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:01 AM)sfink16 Wrote: [ -> ]Tell that to the 6 "P5" teams (Rutgers, Syracuse, Kansas, Arizona St, Arizona, and Baylor) that lost to non-power conference teams this week. That's roughly 10% of the "P5", and much higher percentage of actual games played between the two divisions.
Rutgers, Syracuse, BC, and Nebraska all lost yesterday. Great day for UCONN Nation.
I understand the first 3 (former Big East rivals) on your list but what is Nebraska's connection?
Diaco is now their DC. He made some douchy remarks regarding his former job. Nebraska fans were celebrating the hire, but now many of them are calling for his head after giving up about 80 points in 2 games.
Diaco laughs at scoreboards.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
(09-10-2017 12:06 PM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:49 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote: [ -> ]Those are all top 6 AAC games versus bottom of other G5 conferences. You were favored in all games, and did the expected 6-0. The Tulsa @Toledo game should be a better gauge of power.
Air Force and maybe UNM or MARSHALL are the only other upper half G5 matchups.
This logic doesn't stop G4 clowns from crowning themselves here in the past for beating up AAC bottom dwellers.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
But you just spent a day crowning yourself for beating b otyom dwellers....
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
(09-10-2017 01:13 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 12:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:09 AM)TU4ever Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 10:49 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote: [ -> ]Those are all top 6 AAC games versus bottom of other G5 conferences. You were favored in all games, and did the expected 6-0. The Tulsa @Toledo game should be a better gauge of power.
Air Force and maybe UNM or MARSHALL are the only other upper half G5 matchups.
We have lost two games against the g4 in over two years. There is a clear seperation.
Tulsa's defense is out of sync and looking bad right now. They're still going to win vs toledo. I was thinking 7-14 points. It'll be a shoot out and I am thinking tulsa wins by 4.
Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...
So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
You mean like Memphis, Navy, and UCF?
I mean like we are 6-0 right now vs non-power teams---but that doesnt fit your silly homer narrative so it gets ignored. You need to sell this on the MW Board where people really buy into the idea that internet only games are just as good as being on ESPN. lol....Weren't you the one over there predicting San Jose St was going to blow out Tulsa? I have to admit your rah rah prediction posts over there are pretty funny.
(09-10-2017 04:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 01:13 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 12:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:09 AM)TU4ever Wrote: [ -> ]We have lost two games against the g4 in over two years. There is a clear seperation.
Tulsa's defense is out of sync and looking bad right now. They're still going to win vs toledo. I was thinking 7-14 points. It'll be a shoot out and I am thinking tulsa wins by 4.
Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...
So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
You mean like Memphis, Navy, and UCF?
I mean like we are 6-0 right now vs non-power teams---but that doesnt fit your silly homer narrative so it gets ignored. You need to sell this on the MW Board where people really buy into the idea that internet only games are just as good as being on ESPN. lol....Weren't you the one over there predicting San Jose St was going to blow out Tulsa? I have to admit your rah rah prediction posts over there are pretty funny.
I don't think SJSU plays Tulsa, so how could anyone make that prediction? Maybe you are confusing that with the loss to Toledo this week.
(09-10-2017 06:16 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 04:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 01:13 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 12:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ]Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...
So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
You mean like Memphis, Navy, and UCF?
I mean like we are 6-0 right now vs non-power teams---but that doesnt fit your silly homer narrative so it gets ignored. You need to sell this on the MW Board where people really buy into the idea that internet only games are just as good as being on ESPN. lol....Weren't you the one over there predicting San Jose St was going to blow out Tulsa? I have to admit your rah rah prediction posts over there are pretty funny.
I don't think SJSU plays Tulsa, so how could anyone make that prediction? Maybe you are confusing that with the loss to Toledo this week.
You make so many unfounded claims its hard for us to keep them straight. I did give you your own thread to keep it all in one place, but what ever. . .
He is referring to your pick of new mexico beating tulsa, at tulsa. Something about this is a different team then the past unm teams tulsa has beat down, triple option, defense, the mwc is the bestest conference, navy will get beat by fau, the aac isn't a real football league, . . . Yada yada yada.
Sorry those cherries you pick are sounding delicious and i get distracted thinking about them.
Fanhood trying to educate y'all
Fairly weak AAC schedule vs. the G5 other conferences. AAC vs. P5 is where the AAC needs to do well in. As well as limiting FCS losses.
(09-10-2017 09:18 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote: [ -> ]Fairly weak AAC schedule vs. the G5 other conferences. AAC vs. P5 is where the AAC needs to do well in. As well as limiting FCS losses.
Fairly weak? Well at the end of the day every league has strong and weak, so far even our weak have won their games vs the G teams.
Toledo man going to educate you guys
(09-10-2017 10:11 PM)M1T4 Wrote: [ -> ]Toledo man going to educate you guys
Fortunately the scoreboard will be educating them.
6-0
(09-10-2017 06:16 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 04:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 01:13 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 12:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ]Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...
So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
You mean like Memphis, Navy, and UCF?
I mean like we are 6-0 right now vs non-power teams---but that doesnt fit your silly homer narrative so it gets ignored. You need to sell this on the MW Board where people really buy into the idea that internet only games are just as good as being on ESPN. lol....Weren't you the one over there predicting San Jose St was going to blow out Tulsa? I have to admit your rah rah prediction posts over there are pretty funny.
I don't think SJSU plays Tulsa, so how could anyone make that prediction? Maybe you are confusing that with the loss to Toledo this week.
Sorry. My bad---you were saying something along the lines that SJSU would beat USF (not Tulsa).
(09-10-2017 10:45 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 06:16 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 04:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 01:13 PM)fanhood Wrote: [ -> ] (09-10-2017 12:17 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ]So, games where the AAC team actually has thier coaching staff intact aren't as good of an indicator as games played where the AAC team doesn't have a head coach? I guess if you've been dominated by the AAC losing to them at a 1-10 clip, you grab desperately at any stat available that shows a glimmer of success.
You mean like Memphis, Navy, and UCF?
I mean like we are 6-0 right now vs non-power teams---but that doesnt fit your silly homer narrative so it gets ignored. You need to sell this on the MW Board where people really buy into the idea that internet only games are just as good as being on ESPN. lol....Weren't you the one over there predicting San Jose St was going to blow out Tulsa? I have to admit your rah rah prediction posts over there are pretty funny.
I don't think SJSU plays Tulsa, so how could anyone make that prediction? Maybe you are confusing that with the loss to Toledo this week.
Sorry. My bad---you were saying something along the lines that SJSU would beat USF (not Tulsa).
Sadly we really can't keep it straight
New Mexico just lost a home game to New Mexico State. I don't think the Lobos are winning in Tulsa.
The MWC outside of San Diego State is already toast. Boise's monumental collapse leaves the league with TWO unbeaten teams...but Air Force goes to Ann Arbor this weekend.
Over half of our league is unbeaten.
Come on SDSU, just join us and leave the losers in the MWC
(09-10-2017 11:06 PM)Pony94 Wrote: [ -> ]Come on SDSU, just join us and leave the losers in the MWC
Are you kidding? Did you see what time the arizona houston game finished?