Many West Wing officials are now asking "when," not "if," Bannon goes.
A decision is imminent from White House chief of staff John Kelly on whether Steve Bannon will keep his job, according to administration officials with knowledge of the situation:
https://www.axios.com/white-house-review...43198.html
If he goes I hope he spill everything he knows about the swamp?
Bannon needs to go, along with anyone else who can be tied even remotely to white supremacists. They are just too big a political risk at this point.
The smart move by Kelly would have been to avoid taking the job in the first place. But since he's there, it seems the only way he can even attempt to pull things together is to hand Trump a list with multiple names on it and tell DJT - either they go or I do.
(08-18-2017 10:54 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon needs to go, along with anyone else who can be tied even remotely to white supremacists. They are just too big a political risk at this point.
IM totally against the white crazies and the foxy white libs. IM good with this news as long as they continue cleaning up the corruption in DC. And keep bringing our jobs back to the US.
Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
(08-18-2017 11:02 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
Why?
Quote:Bannon has felt freed this past week and has told friends that he is ready to go "medieval" on enemies of Trump and his populist agenda both in and out of the White House.
A source close to Bannon: "This week is a good window into what Bannon outside the [White House] would look like: A strong defense of POTUS and 'fire and fury' for enemies of The Trump agenda."
"Get ready for Bannon the barbarian."
(08-18-2017 11:04 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Bannon has felt freed this past week and has told friends that he is ready to go "medieval" on enemies of Trump and his populist agenda both in and out of the White House.
A source close to Bannon: "This week is a good window into what Bannon outside the [White House] would look like: A strong defense of POTUS and 'fire and fury' for enemies of The Trump agenda."
"Get ready for Bannon the barbarian."
Yep. Worst thing that could happen to the dems is for Trump to fire him. Democrats are the party of checkers and hop scotch. Never thinking
Quote:according to administration officials with knowledge of the situation
Yeah ok. Considering the fact I have never heard of the website and they don't name their source, I give this about a 10% of being anything other than fake news.
(08-18-2017 11:02 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
I don't know about all that... I do know it shows trump as a politician has a tin ear.
(08-18-2017 11:03 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:02 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
Why?
There's no reason that he should've been there AND he already had a reputation that could undermine the administration. He's part of this "chaos is good, darkness is good" mentality of the alt-right that will end up killing this administration.
(08-18-2017 11:19 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:02 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
I don't know about all that... I do know it shows trump as a politician has a tin ear.
I think he has a tin ear in everything and very little evidence of being able to operate in a system that doesn't have his name on it.
I like Bannon.
I see no reason why he should go.
This racial crap is purely to detract from his hardline stance on economic policy--which is what we voted for Trump to get done.
We talk about racism, I'm curious and need to ask are those Whites that against Whites considered racists?
Trump will fire everybody eventually. It's only a matter of time. The worst part of this administration is the fact that everyone there hates each other. They are all trying to cut the others throat. There is no direction, just hate. They even come in hating each other, just like scary mooo chi.
(08-18-2017 11:26 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:03 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:02 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
Why?
There's no reason that he should've been there AND he already had a reputation that could undermine the administration. He's part of this "chaos is good, darkness is good" mentality of the alt-right that will end up killing this administration.
So because you were told to think so.
(08-18-2017 11:43 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:26 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:03 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:02 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
Why?
There's no reason that he should've been there AND he already had a reputation that could undermine the administration. He's part of this "chaos is good, darkness is good" mentality of the alt-right that will end up killing this administration.
So because you were told to think so.
If you say so Shere.
(08-18-2017 11:46 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:43 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:26 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:03 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (08-18-2017 11:02 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote: [ -> ]Bannon's hiring in the first place is one of the reasons I don't believe Trump is a competent leader.
Why?
There's no reason that he should've been there AND he already had a reputation that could undermine the administration. He's part of this "chaos is good, darkness is good" mentality of the alt-right that will end up killing this administration.
So because you were told to think so.
If you say so Shere.
In fairness, he's right.
You basically said your problem with him was because of his reputation. Your lack of pointing to a specific thing he has done lends credence to his point.