https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/...ia-stories
When you read their statements and timelines it sure is incriminating. This is a factual compilation of events. No need to fear it. Would FoxNews inform you of such timelines of events? I tried to look for something like this on their site and no such luck. I was hoping to find it for you guys. You guys will just have to settle for Vox. Read it and try to refute it.
This thread would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.
Look who slept their drunk off....
Ok. Read it and dispute it. What are you afraid of?
I refuse to give that left-wing hack site any clicks. You can call that whatever you like, your slanderous insults have no effect on me.
(07-22-2017 07:20 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/...ia-stories
When you read their statements and timelines it sure is incriminating. This is a factual compilation of events. No need to fear it. Would FoxNews inform you of such timelines of events? I tried to look for something like this on their site and no such luck. I was hoping to find it for you guys. You guys will just have to settle for Vox. Read it and try to refute it.
name the crime....none in the article denotes a crime....all you have to do is name it....this ain't rocket science.....however, it dayum sure is dollar general counter room only fodder....
I'm pretty certain everyone on this board would own it if anyone could.....
you guys are out of control......it's going to eat yaz up like aunt jemima puckering a pancake....
O.J.'s cell will be freed up in October. A few more cells will be needed as well...
Kushner omitted over 100 contacts egregiously on his sf 86. If he were any other person he would be imprisoned. It's unfathomable that he still has security clearance. You mess up one time it's your ass. He has purposely evaded answering truthfully. A felony.
(07-22-2017 08:11 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Kushner omitted over 100 contacts egregiously on his sf 86. If he were any other person he would be imprisoned. It's unfathomable that he still has security clearance. You mess up one time it's your ass. He has purposely evaded answering truthfully. A felony.
Failing to list things on an SF86 is not something you go to prison for. You fix it. I've screwed it up before. Came out in the interview, and we fixed it. I guess that makes me a felon, right. But I got my TS renewed, so I guess it wasn't all that serious.
How many things did you omit?
I've been told that if you omit one thing intentionally your career is done.
(07-22-2017 08:22 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]I've been told that if you omit one thing intentionally your career is done.
No.
Intentionally omitting meetings with a hostile foreign adversary? BS
and you had the nerve to be critical of Hillary's computer server and take no issue here? Crazy. Kushner is in deep trouble.
(07-22-2017 08:06 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote: [ -> ]O.J.'s cell will be freed up in October. A few more cells will be needed as well...
Susan Rice, Huma Abedin and Hillary Clinton will have to go to a women's prison.
Did they intentionally lie on their SF 86 too?
you're dodgin' mach.....
name the crime.....we'll own it....
it's a certainty they'll find something that would be considered egregious....
however, just step back back for a moment.....
IF any independent council was tasked with digging up dirt that violated 'some' law in the infinite law of the "LAWS".....everybody on the planet would be in jail....
Trump ****** up by allowing Mueller to take this on.......WAS A YUGE MISTAKE
however, don't get confused within his confusion............ol' boy only sees the big pic......he doesn't see the dew on the leaves.....
that's who I want in that position.....he's pro business and pro america.....give ol' boy a shot at it.....he might just surprise ya....
This all reminds me of a deal I got into with TNRCC years ago. I get this call, "Do you remember an email you sent to us regarding [my client, who is conferenced in with us] in June 1998 (this was during 2007 or 2008)?"
"No," I replied.
"You don't remember it?" (I've been given no details about what it was about or what it said at this point)
"Hell, no, I don't remember it. I've slept a few times since then. What was it about?"
"Well, we're having a hearing about it next Tuesday at 10 AM in Austin and we would like for you to be there."
"Well, I have a conflict on Tuesday, can we do it Wednesday at 10?"
"Yes."
So I go to the hearing. Still have no clue what this is about. Turns out it's an email I did send to respond to a question they had, the week before my son and I left to go to the World Cup in France. I remembered being in a hurry to get it out after they dropped the request on me at the last minute before we left. It was a financial projection and the situation changed, so the actual numbers 9 years later were somewhat different than my projection. The staff was incredulous that I didn't remember every last detail about the email off the top of my head, but fortunately once I saw the email, it refreshed my memory enough that I could explain everything satisfactorily, and my client walked out with the approvals he needed.
My point is that's one difference between how government operates and how normal people operate. You're expected to remember every last detail of something you probably forgot about years ago. If I had to fill out an SF86 today, I'm sure I'd make mistakes, because normal people just don't remember all those details as a matter of routine. But I'd fix the errors as they came to my attention, which is acceptable.
(07-22-2017 08:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Intentionally omitting meetings with a hostile foreign adversary? BS
Where is the proof of intent?
What war are we in with Russia?
(07-22-2017 08:26 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]and you had the nerve to be critical of Hillary's computer server and take no issue here? Crazy. Kushner is in deep trouble.
Hillary's computer server is far more serious than this.
On a scale of 1 to 100, this is about a 4 and Hillary's server is about an 85.