Newsmax
Limbaugh: Obama’s Protégé Holder Mulls Run Against Trump
Top talker Rush Limbaugh is warning that Obama’s #1 protégé and former Attorney General, Eric Holder, is seriously considering a run against President Trump in 2020.
“Oh, have you ever heard that Eric Holder is thinking of running for president in
2020?” Rush asked his audience this week.
Limbaugh shared the surprising report with his listeners:
“Former Attorney General Eric Holder spoke in Los Angeles on Monday to promote a bill that some observers say would make California a ‘sanctuary state,’ an appearance that he says is the start of a new phase of his career in which he plans to re-enter the world of politics.”
Limbaugh added: “And it’s all leading up to running for the presidency in 2020.”
Let him run, after he's investigated by the new Congress for lying to the grand jury and for screwing up Fast and Furious. I can see the Republicans not going into that arena yet until they finish what they promised its voters. Hopefully, it'll come to him, Lynch, and Clinton.
Dems love incompetents that fit into one of the identity groups.
So, the libturds are going to run a second consecutive candidate who will be under investigation for criminal activity? Well, that sounds like a plan.
I think Holder will be a pretty strong candidate, especially compared to what else is out there. At the very least, he seems like there is more substance to him and his background than there was with Obama, or for Trump for that matter.
(06-23-2017 07:02 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]I think Holder will be a pretty strong candidate, especially compared to what else is out there. At the very least, he seems like there is more substance to him and his background than there was with Obama, or for Trump for that matter.
Yeah fast and furious should really help bolster his cred.
Sent from my SM-J700T using
CSNbbs mobile app
It's already racist to oppose him, especially racist not to vote for him, and is Nazi-racist not to support his agenda while in office.
(06-23-2017 07:46 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]It's already racist to oppose him, especially racist not to vote for him, and is Nazi-racist not to support his agenda while in office.
Now that "racist" has lost its meaning, they now call us "white supremacists".
(06-23-2017 07:46 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]It's already racist to oppose him, especially racist not to vote for him, and is Nazi-racist not to support his agenda while in office.
Guessing most of us will fall into those catagories then. But anymore do We really care what the left thinks ?
run rabbit.......run
(06-23-2017 08:06 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (06-23-2017 07:46 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]It's already racist to oppose him, especially racist not to vote for him, and is Nazi-racist not to support his agenda while in office.
Now that "racist" has lost its meaning, they now call us "white supremacists".
And each and every time, liberals have been shocked to discover that ordinary people don't like being called that.
They once again fail to grasp that some people may hate President Trump,
but more people hate liberals. Ordinary Americans simply don't like leftists very much.
(06-23-2017 09:20 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ] (06-23-2017 08:06 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (06-23-2017 07:46 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]It's already racist to oppose him, especially racist not to vote for him, and is Nazi-racist not to support his agenda while in office.
Now that "racist" has lost its meaning, they now call us "white supremacists".
And each and every time, liberals have been shocked to discover that ordinary people don't like being called that.
They once again fail to grasp that some people may hate President Trump, but more people hate liberals. Ordinary Americans simply don't like leftists very much.
#ab(w)hor(e)
(06-23-2017 07:04 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (06-23-2017 07:02 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]I think Holder will be a pretty strong candidate, especially compared to what else is out there. At the very least, he seems like there is more substance to him and his background than there was with Obama, or for Trump for that matter.
Yeah fast and furious should really help bolster his cred.
He was never going to get the votes of the 48% of Americans who know what is meant by "fast and furious"... neither was any other Democrat.
The D by his name gives him the 48% of the vote of people that couldn't care less about fast and furious.
It's really a matter of how well each side can get keep from pissing off their own 48% and getting them to the polls.
It may indeed be that only a black Democrat can win.