CSNbbs

Full Version: 70% of CNN Poll Say Trump Should Not Be Investigated for Obstruction of Justice
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
OOPS, not what they expected. They really don't get how upset the American people are at these witch hunts being pushed by the Dems and MSM.

Quote:[Image: 2cpoqxy.jpg]
[Image: 9ftkxy.jpg]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/...n-justice/
libturds really need to think about what they are getting themselves into.
(06-18-2017 10:39 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]OOPS, not what they expected. They really don't get how upset the American people are at these witch hunts being pushed by the Dems and MSM.

Quote:[Image: 2cpoqxy.jpg]
[Image: 9ftkxy.jpg]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/...n-justice/

Surprised they reported it and didn't make up something that fits their narrative.

It's what they do these days...

https://archive.is/rDKvt
Nah. Let them keep overplaying a losing hand. Once the lying gets going and all the leading Democratic 2020 candidates are on board the impeachment train, release the tapes to Fox News.
(06-18-2017 10:39 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]OOPS, not what they expected. They really don't get how upset the American people are at these witch hunts being pushed by the Dems and MSM.

Quote:[Image: 2cpoqxy.jpg]
[Image: 9ftkxy.jpg]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/...n-justice/

This really is friggin' hilarious.
2.6 million votes and Trumps's up all night online... 03-wink

Surprised that many understand there is no obstruction to investigate. Not sure why this would cause suicides at CNN.
You knew by the way Trump talked about Comey during his campaign that he was going to fire him, which he has every legal right to do so. That is not obstruction of justice. I do support the investigation into the role that Russia played in the election.
Cold coup by the lawyers? https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2017/06/16/...civil-war/

"...A considerable portion of America’s permanent bureaucracy, including elements of its intelligence community, is engaged in an illegal and unconstitutional mutiny against the elected commander-in-chief, President Donald Trump. Most of the Democratic Party and a fair sampling of the Republican establishment wants to force Trump out of office, and to this end undertook an entrapment scheme to entice the president and his staff into actions which might be construed after the fact as obstruction of justice. By means yet undisclosed, the mutineers forced Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn from office and now seek to bring down the president for allegedly obstructing an investigation of Gen. Flynn that arose in the first place from the entrapment scheme.

One of the Republican Party’s most distinguished statesman recently told a closed gathering that a “cold coup” is underway against the president. I do not know and have not sought to learn the substance of the allegations; Gen. Flynn has no choice as a matter of self-preservation but to hold his peace and presently cannot defend himself in public.

By no coincidence is Gen. Flynn the central character in this scenario. As I wrote in February, the CIA really is out to get him:

Flynn’s Defense Intelligence Agency produced a now-notorious 2012 report warning that chaos in Syria’s civil war enabled the rise of a new Caliphate movement, namely ISIS. For full background, see  Brad Hoff’s July 2016 essay in Foreign Policy Journal: Flynn humiliated the bungling CIA and exposed the incompetence and deception of the Obama administration, and got fired for it. If anyone doubts the depth of CIA incompetence in Syria, I recommend an account that appeared this month in the London  Financial Times...."
This Russia junk is going to ensure he is reelected if the Dems aren't careful.

They are doubling down on failure. Will they win New York and California with even a wider margin? Yes. But, they will loose the states they lost last time with an even wider margin.

Then they will cry about how that isn't fair.
Those in power in the swamp will break any law and do anything legal or illegal to stop from being drained.
Is anyone seriously taking an online poll as indicative of anything?
(06-19-2017 12:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Is anyone seriously taking an online poll as indicative of anything?

That isn't the point. 03-shhhh
an online poll? like really? it's as if the OP and those agreeing with him have literally no shame.
(06-19-2017 12:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Is anyone seriously taking an online poll as indicative of anything?

That isn't the point. 03-shhhh

okay what's the point
(06-19-2017 12:11 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Is anyone seriously taking an online poll as indicative of anything?

That isn't the point. 03-shhhh

okay what's the point

That the same people that view and go to CNN's website don't necessarily agree with their outlandish fantasies.
(06-19-2017 10:37 AM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ]Cold coup by the lawyers? https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2017/06/16/...civil-war/

"...A considerable portion of America’s permanent bureaucracy, including elements of its intelligence community, is engaged in an illegal and unconstitutional mutiny against the elected commander-in-chief, President Donald Trump. Most of the Democratic Party and a fair sampling of the Republican establishment wants to force Trump out of office, and to this end undertook an entrapment scheme to entice the president and his staff into actions which might be construed after the fact as obstruction of justice. By means yet undisclosed, the mutineers forced Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn from office and now seek to bring down the president for allegedly obstructing an investigation of Gen. Flynn that arose in the first place from the entrapment scheme.

One of the Republican Party’s most distinguished statesman recently told a closed gathering that a “cold coup” is underway against the president. I do not know and have not sought to learn the substance of the allegations; Gen. Flynn has no choice as a matter of self-preservation but to hold his peace and presently cannot defend himself in public.

By no coincidence is Gen. Flynn the central character in this scenario. As I wrote in February, the CIA really is out to get him:

Flynn’s Defense Intelligence Agency produced a now-notorious 2012 report warning that chaos in Syria’s civil war enabled the rise of a new Caliphate movement, namely ISIS. For full background, see  Brad Hoff’s July 2016 essay in Foreign Policy Journal: Flynn humiliated the bungling CIA and exposed the incompetence and deception of the Obama administration, and got fired for it. If anyone doubts the depth of CIA incompetence in Syria, I recommend an account that appeared this month in the London  Financial Times...."

Who do these people think they are?

They don't like the election outcome so they try to subvert it.

Let's just say for a minute that outside governments are trying to impact our election process. Sure, that's bad.

But an inside job is even worse.

Why hold free elections is the outcomes are undermined by the bureaucracy?

We have a serious problem on our hands. Our own government refuses to abide by the law.
updated results

[Image: dqtdhe.jpg]
(06-19-2017 12:12 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:11 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Is anyone seriously taking an online poll as indicative of anything?

That isn't the point. 03-shhhh

okay what's the point

That the same people that view and go to CNN's website don't necessarily agree with their outlandish fantasies.

[Image: 200_s.gif]

Or bots or trumpsters manipulated the results. That's the point!

Hence the disclaimer right on the effing photo: "This survey is not scientific"
(06-19-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:12 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:11 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Is anyone seriously taking an online poll as indicative of anything?

That isn't the point. 03-shhhh

okay what's the point

That the same people that view and go to CNN's website don't necessarily agree with their outlandish fantasies.

[Image: 200_s.gif]

Or bots or trumpsters manipulated the results. That's the point!

The Russians hacked the CNN poll!
(06-19-2017 01:20 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:12 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:11 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-19-2017 12:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]That isn't the point. 03-shhhh

okay what's the point

That the same people that view and go to CNN's website don't necessarily agree with their outlandish fantasies.

[Image: 200_s.gif]

Or bots or trumpsters manipulated the results. That's the point!

The Russians hacked the CNN poll!

It's always someone else's fault.
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's