CSNbbs

The hate in the leftist media exposed one more time. He will probably get a promotion at WaPo for this....

Quote:

Levi Smith tweeted the following:







http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/...dicalleft/

He's not a WaPo writer, he contributed one piece for them. I'm going to go out on a limb and say it will be his only contribution.

bwahahahahaha a typo..... idiot.....

looks like Cernovich jumped in as well in that thread.

(06-15-2017 11:39 AM)fsquid Wrote: [ -> ]He's not a WaPo writer, he contributed one piece for them.

Ridiculous logic.

(06-15-2017 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]bwahahahahaha a typo..... idiot.....

looks like Cernovich jumped in as well in that thread.

Anytime you see the outlets themselves forced into responding, it's a safe bet that Cernovich was involved. Dude is a machine.

Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

(06-15-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

That is the correct, historical context of 2A.

The fact that you want to rub it in the nose of a victim of a terrorist attack is ******* disgusting, though I'm not surprised.

(06-15-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

context Tom, context.

(06-15-2017 01:21 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

That is the correct, historical context of 2A.

The fact that you want to rub it in the nose of a victim of a terrorist attack is ******* disgusting, though I'm not surprised.

Yeah...that's clearly what I did. The fact that you twisted my post into that is even more disgusting, though I'm not surprised.

(06-15-2017 01:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:21 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

That is the correct, historical context of 2A.

The fact that you want to rub it in the nose of a victim of a terrorist attack is ******* disgusting, though I'm not surprised.

Yeah...that's clearly what I did. The fact that you twisted my post into that is even more disgusting, thought I'm not surprised.

Yes, clearly. Your words speaks for themselves.

(06-15-2017 01:22 PM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

context Tom, context.

They were playing baseball Tom, not doing a no knock raid on an innocent person's home.

(06-15-2017 01:25 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:21 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

That is the correct, historical context of 2A.

The fact that you want to rub it in the nose of a victim of a terrorist attack is ******* disgusting, though I'm not surprised.

Yeah...that's clearly what I did. The fact that you twisted my post into that is even more disgusting, thought I'm not surprised.

Yes, clearly. Your words speaks for themselves.

Go troll someone else pal.

(06-15-2017 01:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:25 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:21 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 01:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Then you have Rand Paul, who tweeted just about a year ago:

".@Judgenap: Why do we have a Second Amendment? It's not to shoot deer. It's to shoot at the government when it becomes tyrannical!"
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592

Yeah...that didn't age too well, huh Randal?

That is the correct, historical context of 2A.

The fact that you want to rub it in the nose of a victim of a terrorist attack is ******* disgusting, though I'm not surprised.

Yeah...that's clearly what I did. The fact that you twisted my post into that is even more disgusting, thought I'm not surprised.

Yes, clearly. Your words speaks for themselves.

Go troll someone else pal.

The irony of you calling anyone a troll is not lost on this poster.

Evidently Mr. Harris made an even worse tweet, that he deleted, but not before his hate could be saved....You libs have the hate award in America wrapped up for good. This guy hoping a hospital mistake kills Congressman Scalise. Real classy there libs.

(06-15-2017 02:08 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]Evidently Mr. Harris made an even worse tweet, that he deleted, but not before his hate could be saved....You libs have the hate award in America wrapped up for good. This guy hoping a hospital mistake kills Congressman Scalise. Real classy there libs.

Die from hospital errors? Like Seth Rich?

(06-15-2017 02:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 02:08 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]Evidently Mr. Harris made an even worse tweet, that he deleted, but not before his hate could be saved....You libs have the hate award in America wrapped up for good. This guy hoping a hospital mistake kills Congressman Scalise. Real classy there libs.

Die from hospital errors? Like Seth Rich?

Maybe that is why it was reported that Trump took another private Doctor to the hospital visit of Scalise.

(06-15-2017 02:12 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 02:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2017 02:08 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]Evidently Mr. Harris made an even worse tweet, that he deleted, but not before his hate could be saved....You libs have the hate award in America wrapped up for good. This guy hoping a hospital mistake kills Congressman Scalise. Real classy there libs.

Die from hospital errors? Like Seth Rich?

Maybe that is why it was reported that Trump took another private Doctor to the hospital visit of Scalise.

I'd certainly want to ensure the attending physician or the surgeons were not mentioned in Podesta emails by name.

That Liberalturd is a real piece of Crapola. He looks like he would get beat up in school a lot. Big mouth.

He looks and writes and thinks like he is about 14.

What a piece of work this guy is...

Quote:The Times didn’t mention it, but to many observers Harris is best known not an aspiring littérateur but as an early leader of the Occupy Wall Street movement. In a September 2012 postmortem on OWS, Mark Ames, a veteran of MSNBC and The Nation – in other words, a solid left-winger – waxed cynical about the movement, whose failures he attributed largely to Harris, whom he mocked as a self-seeking “twenty-something hipster” and poster boy for a certain “brand of marketing-concocted ‘anarchism.’” Wrote Ames: “one look at Malcolm Harris – his anarcho-hipster sneer, his marketing-guy hipster glasses – and you’ll be reaching for the nearest can of pepper spray.”

Then came the lawsuit. In December 2012, after denying for over a year that he and other OWS activists hadn’t been warned by police to stay off the Brooklyn Bridge during an October 1, 2011, march – and hinting through his lawyer that, on the contrary, police had deliberately lured protesters onto the bridge – Harris’s own tweets from that day, which he’d fought to keep secret but which Twitter had provided to the court, showed that he was lying. Facing trial on a charge of disorderly conduct, he pleaded guilty. Even his lawyer was reprimanded for having played fast and loose with the facts.

Harris has continued writing prolifically – and in a thoroughly predictable vein. In January he contributed an article to Al Jazeera’s website entitled “Wealthy Cabals Run America”; in February the same site ran a piece of his entitled “Hooray for Cultural Marxism.” He’s also contributed plenty of articles to Jacobin, “a leading voice of the American left, offering socialist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture.” That there are nasty corners of the Internet prepared to give space to this mendacious young stooge is hardly surprising; but it’s depressing that The New Republic, once known for its staunch liberal anti-Communism, should welcome him into its pages.

Malcolm H