CSNbbs

Comey basically nailed NY Times for fake story. Knowing this fake media rag has been busted on national tv is truly priceless.

Quote:The New York Times is “looking into” whether one of its big Russia scoops is actually true, after former FBI Director James Comey disputed the report in Thursday testimony before Congress.

The paper of record reported Feb. 14 that U.S. intelligence officials had intercepted repeated communications between the Trump campaign and senior Russian intelligence officials in the year leading up to the election. The news firmly planted the as yet totally unsubstantiated narrative that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to sway the election in his favor.

But Comey characterized the report as almost entirely false Thursday, and The New York Times is now reviewing the report in light of his statements. “We are looking into James Comey’s statements, and we will report back with more information as soon as we can,” TheNYT tweeted following the hearing, after prominent journalists highlighted Comey’s statement.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/08/nyt-lo...ely-false/

If we cannot rely on the news to report honestly, how can we distinguish it from propaganda? And if we can’t distinguish it from propaganda, why should we give journalists any respect?

Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

(06-09-2017 11:23 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]If we cannot rely on the news to report honestly, how can we distinguish it from propaganda? And if we can’t distinguish it from propaganda, why should we give journalists any respect?

The lib media can easily qualify as propaganda arms of the left in America. It really got exposed yesterday.

(06-09-2017 11:23 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]If we cannot rely on the news to report honestly, how can we distinguish it from propaganda? And if we can’t distinguish it from propaganda, why should we give journalists any respect?

I guess they will have to go back to Clapper and ask him to repeat the lies he told them on the 14th.

#UnbuckleUp

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

It would if caught redhanded... They are "looking into it", that's a nice way of saying "We are doing some damage control"

A couple of months ago, I posted links to stories from the New York Times and Wall Street Journal about the EXACT SAME NEWS EVENT.

By reading the stories, you easily could have thought it was two entirely different events. I'm biased but I believe that the WSJ did a better job of presenting ALL the relevant facts. The Times' effort was very selective in what was presented and spun those that could easily lead to misunderstanding the events.

This is standard practice for news media these days. If you only report selectively, you can deceive the readers, who are already suffering from confirmation bias, that the story means something it doesn't.

(06-09-2017 11:56 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

It would if caught redhanded... They are "looking into it", that's a nice way of saying "We are doing some damage control"

Correct, like how some of the lying fact checkers like politifact and snopes had to correct their lies about Syria's chemical weapons being gone thanks to Obama, after Syria used chemical weapons that we were told didnt exist.

NYT, and CNN... fake news!

(06-09-2017 12:14 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ]NYT, and CNN... fake news!

CNN is lies and fake news and serious mental illness.

NYT is gross distortion or hiding of the truth and propaganda.

(06-09-2017 12:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:56 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

It would if caught redhanded... They are "looking into it", that's a nice way of saying "We are doing some damage control"

Correct, like how some of the lying fact checkers like politifact and snopes had to correct their lies about Syria's chemical weapons being gone thanks to Obama, after Syria used chemical weapons that we were told didnt exist.

Going by info had at the time isn't a lie.

(06-09-2017 12:39 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 12:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:56 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

It would if caught redhanded... They are "looking into it", that's a nice way of saying "We are doing some damage control"

Correct, like how some of the lying fact checkers like politifact and snopes had to correct their lies about Syria's chemical weapons being gone thanks to Obama, after Syria used chemical weapons that we were told didnt exist.

Going by info had at the time isn't a lie.

If you print something like this...you own it. If it's proven to be a lie at any point. It's your lie. News papers use to not run with something like this unless it was verified

(06-09-2017 12:39 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 12:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:56 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

It would if caught redhanded... They are "looking into it", that's a nice way of saying "We are doing some damage control"

Correct, like how some of the lying fact checkers like politifact and snopes had to correct their lies about Syria's chemical weapons being gone thanks to Obama, after Syria used chemical weapons that we were told didnt exist.

Going by info had at the time isn't a lie.

The info at the time was that Obama getting rid of chemical weapons in Syria was a lie. The fake fact checkers covered up Obama's lie with a lie of their own. And they kept repeating their lie until it was exposed.

Every intelligent person knew that Obama, Kerry, and Rice had not succeeded in removing all of the chemical weapons from syria. But the fake fact checkers knew there would be grubers out there like you who would believe it. And you did.

So you're saying everything they count as a lie in trumps scorecard is a lie http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/ because they are fake fact checkers, no you're just an *******.

(06-09-2017 12:42 PM)WKUYG Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 12:39 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 12:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:56 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

It would if caught redhanded... They are "looking into it", that's a nice way of saying "We are doing some damage control"

Correct, like how some of the lying fact checkers like politifact and snopes had to correct their lies about Syria's chemical weapons being gone thanks to Obama, after Syria used chemical weapons that we were told didnt exist.

Going by info had at the time isn't a lie.

If you print something like this...you own it. If it's proven to be a lie at any point. It's your lie. New papers use to not run with something like this unless it was verified

Libs could care less about the truth. They have no problem claiming lies are not lies and truth is not true. Pretty sad really, but it is who they are. Yesterday Comey destroyed their fairy tales and they can't deal with it just like they can't deal with the fact that Trump beat their corrupt b#tch.

(06-09-2017 12:39 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 12:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:56 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

It would if caught redhanded... They are "looking into it", that's a nice way of saying "We are doing some damage control"

Correct, like how some of the lying fact checkers like politifact and snopes had to correct their lies about Syria's chemical weapons being gone thanks to Obama, after Syria used chemical weapons that we were told didnt exist.

Going by info had at the time isn't a lie.

Dan Rather will be relieved to hear that...

Fact of the matter is if you don't do your due diligence in reporting something like this, then you open yourself up to serious trouble.

I would not even read the NYtimes travel section,

(06-09-2017 12:47 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]So you're saying everything they count as a lie in trumps scorecard is a lie http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/ because they are fake fact checkers, no you're just an *******.

MUH SCORECARD!

Yea, what I'm saying is that I've never read their "scorecard", because if they were propagating lies about Syria's chemical weapons, they wlil propagate it about anything.

Integrity - you dont have it when you knowingly propagate a false narrative.

But ok, I went to your little "scorecard" site, and this is their very first "pants on fire" claim.

All Pants on Fire! statements involving Donald Trump


DONALD TRUMP
"This Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should've won."
— PolitiFact National on Friday, May 12th, 2017

Their response.
Pants on Fire!
Made up by the FBI?

What say you, Gruber? The "FBI" just acknowledged that they had told Trump 3 times that he was not under investigation.

BUT MUH PANTS ON FIRE!

(06-09-2017 11:26 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote: [ -> ]Propaganda wouldn't fix statements.

Propaganda would "fix" statements. Propaganda would never admit to making shite up.