CSNbbs

Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...story.html

Dont blame him. Because Obama had the tappity tap tap going. And Obamas administration is still leaking stuff.

Kennedy had a Back Channel link to the Soviet Leadership.

Why would transition teams have open public communications with any Government? Did Obama blast his foreign calls all over the place? Weird post OP.

(05-26-2017 07:56 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ]Why would transition teams have open public communications with any Government? Did Obama blast his foreign calls all over the place? Weird post OP.

Just more WaPo TDS.

This was in the news months ago.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(05-26-2017 08:18 PM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ]This was in the news months ago.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

They got to dig it back up and pimp it so that nobody pays attention to the DNC crapping their pants over whats about to drop on them.

I'd be worried if we didn't have back alley communications to like 50 different countries. Kushner's not my cup of tea, but this request isn't unrealistic to make when your office needs to take covert action in order to save lives.

I think the Dems and the MSM get together and throw a dart on the wall and whatever picture it hits, that is their new target with fake news.

(05-26-2017 09:46 PM)oliveandblue Wrote: [ -> ]I'd be worried if we didn't have back alley communications to like 50 different countries. Kushner's not my cup of tea, but this request isn't unrealistic to make when your office needs to take covert action in order to save lives.

Especially when you are being "taped", which this confirms.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Daddy-in-law is going to throw Jared under the bus, you mark my words.

What is the crime here?

(05-26-2017 10:14 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: [ -> ]Daddy-in-law is going to throw Jared under the bus, you mark my words.

For what? Doing his job?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(05-26-2017 10:14 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: [ -> ]Daddy-in-law is going to throw Jared under the bus, you mark my words.

I seriously doubt that there is anyone in his administration, who is more secure than Jared. Well, except maybe Ivanka.

(05-27-2017 07:37 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-26-2017 10:14 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: [ -> ]Daddy-in-law is going to throw Jared under the bus, you mark my words.

I seriously doubt that there is anyone in his administration, who is more secure than Jared. Well, except maybe Ivanka.

Exactly.

(05-26-2017 10:14 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: [ -> ]Daddy-in-law is going to throw Jared under the bus, you mark my words.

"Sorry, Ivanka, it was him or me and you know the rules of the family..."

Where's the evidence? Do you guys even know what evidence means? There's nothing here?

(05-26-2017 07:27 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]Dont blame him. Because Obama had the tappity tap tap going. And Obamas administration is still leaking stuff.

My thoughts exactly. Just because he doesn't want his conversations leaked isn't an indicator he is/was planning anything illegal.

This is just so rich.....libturds and Obama were butthurt because Jared was working to set up communications that Obama's weaponized intelligence team couldnt tappity tap into.

Yes, that is EXACTLY what they are saying.

More Russian ties.