http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2...trump.html
Maybe their internal polling is pointing out that most Americans view them as nuts. They are continuing to start to back off the impeachment talk.
Or maybe they are afraid they will lose in the primaries when they can't deliver impeachment with 190 votes in the House and 48 in the Senate.
That makes perfect sense, when you think about it.
"You wouldn't impeach Trump, so I'm going to vote for the GOP to spite you!"
(05-16-2017 09:59 AM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ]That makes perfect sense, when you think about it.
"You wouldn't impeach Trump, so I'm going to vote for the GOP to spite you!"
Gasp, you really need to learn to read.
(05-16-2017 10:02 AM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ] (05-16-2017 09:59 AM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ]That makes perfect sense, when you think about it.
"You wouldn't impeach Trump, so I'm going to vote for the GOP to spite you!"
Gasp, you really need to learn to read.
Xe trolls hard. Xe comes on and changes the subject of debate to something better suited for xer. Have a thread about false flags and Xe will get offended they don't know 11th grade history and change the subject.
So I thin Xe read it just fine, but want's to see everyone fight a strawman.
I honestly don't want Trump impeached.
Lame duck President yes.
Impeachment..................NO
(05-16-2017 09:59 AM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ]That makes perfect sense, when you think about it.
"You wouldn't impeach Trump, so I'm going to vote for the GOP to spite you!"
How about, you wouldn't impeach trump, so I'm not excited to go out and support you... Instead I'm going to either stay home or split the party vote with a more 'aggressive' progressive. Did you guys learn nothing from Bernie/losing?
(05-16-2017 10:08 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]I honestly don't want Trump impeached.
Lame duck President yes.
Impeachment..................NO
Generally agree (for your side), but impeachment doesn't mean he is removed from office. See Clinton.
They do look like nuts. They should calm down, chill out, shut up, and wait for Trump to impeach himself...which he seems like might be inclined to do if you get out of his way.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
(05-16-2017 10:09 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]Instead I'm going to either stay home
This is the same thing as voting for the GOP. They learned that sad, tragic lesson last year.
(05-16-2017 10:09 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]or split the party vote with a more 'aggressive' progressive.
Let such a candidate rear his/her head. I will listen to what he/she has to say, and consider the options.
If Bernie had been younger and more pragmatic, he would probably be president right now.
right now Trump is only guilty of being a loon. He isn't even close to impeachment.
(05-16-2017 10:23 AM)fsquid Wrote: [ -> ]right now Trump is only guilty of being a loon. He isn't even close to impeachment.
Yeah ... firing the FBI Director, then going on TV and saying that you (yourself) explicitly decided to fire him because he was investigating you, and then publicly threatening him over Twitter ... definitely should not even come close to making people think you should be impeached.
(05-16-2017 09:54 AM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2...trump.html
Maybe their internal polling is pointing out that most Americans view them as nuts. They are continuing to start to back off the impeachment talk.
Or maybe they are afraid they will lose in the primaries when they can't deliver impeachment with 190 votes in the House and 48 in the Senate.
It's too predictable. It's all fabricated hogwash by political operatives and it's not gaining any traction outside of their guilable far left supporters. The price for only preaching to the converted is too high and they know that bill comes due in the 2018 elections when they will get led to the slaughter if they don't get off of the land of make believe.
(05-16-2017 10:30 AM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ] (05-16-2017 10:23 AM)fsquid Wrote: [ -> ]right now Trump is only guilty of being a loon. He isn't even close to impeachment.
Yeah ... firing the FBI Director, then going on TV and saying that you (yourself) explicitly decided to fire him because he was investigating you, and then publicly threatening him over Twitter ... definitely should not even come close to making people think you should be impeached.
An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history
(05-16-2017 10:02 AM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ] (05-16-2017 09:59 AM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ]That makes perfect sense, when you think about it.
"You wouldn't impeach Trump, so I'm going to vote for the GOP to spite you!"
Gasp, you really need to learn to read.
This is how MplsBison reads:
I write:
"I do not like Hillary Clinton and I did not vote for her because I believe the best qualified should be elected and she should not be elected just because she is a woman."
MplsBison reads:
"
I do not like Hillary Clinton and I did not vote for her because I believe the best qualified should be elected and she should not be elected just because she is a woman."
MplsBison would then goes on to state over and over that I like Hillary and I voted for her because I'm a 4th Wave Feminist and I feel that women should control 110% of the government authority.
No matter how many times people would point back to my comments and say 'he didn't say that', MplsBison will continue to think everyone else is insane and think everyone else is being intentionally obstinate.
(05-16-2017 10:20 AM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ] (05-16-2017 10:09 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]Instead I'm going to either stay home
This is the same thing as voting for the GOP. They learned that sad, tragic lesson last year.
I think it obvious that I'm implying that they very clearly didn't learn anything.
Even you didn't suggest this until I said it. You suggested that they would vote for the other party.
And no, that's not the same thing.
'not voting' isn't AT ALL the same as voting for the other. That's not how the math works.
(05-16-2017 10:09 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]or split the party vote with a more 'aggressive' progressive.
Let such a candidate rear his/her head. I will listen to what he/she has to say, and consider the options.
If Bernie had been younger and more pragmatic, he would probably be president right now.
[/quote]
You just got through saying they learned a lesson, and here you are making the same one.
Bernie excited the 'fringe' democrats, but not the establishment. The establishment doesn't stay home NOR does it vote for the other party. It's the fringe that stayed home and you lost as a result. Now, you seem to be saying that such a candidate doesn't exist and you've added 'younger and more pragmatic' despite that not seeming to be a hindrance in 2016...
The lesson to be learned from 2016 is that LARGE swaths of both political parties are tired of the 'party' BS. Even Pelosi seems to get this (at least a little).
(05-16-2017 11:25 AM)Hambone10 Wrote: [ -> ]'not voting' isn't AT ALL the same as voting for the other. That's not how the math works.
Don't you know that 1 - 1 = Potato?
(05-16-2017 10:23 AM)fsquid Wrote: [ -> ]right now Trump is only guilty of being a loon. He isn't even close to impeachment.
If Trump is a loon then pelosi, Schumer, warren, waters and even schiff are full on, bonified, batshite crazy. As long as we are making subjective observations...
(05-16-2017 10:17 AM)ark30inf Wrote: [ -> ]They do look like nuts. They should calm down, chill out, shut up, and wait for Trump to impeach himself...which he seems like might be inclined to do if you get out of his way.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
Tragically, that's so true.
Shut it up Trumpie. Be like Oblunder only speak when there's a teleprompter in front of you.
Trump is the best fundraiser they have.
First we need to get through this Russher investigation then see if impeachment is warranted.