The White House announced Monday that it would host an unusual private briefing on North Korea for the entire Senate, prompting questions from lawmakers about whether the Trump administration intends to use the event as a photo op ahead of its 100-day mark.
Linky
I heard they had to remodel a room just for this photo op.
(04-25-2017 11:24 AM)VA49er Wrote: [ -> ]lulz.....
Fit is usually pretty active with board spamming early in the week.
(04-25-2017 11:26 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote: [ -> ] (04-25-2017 11:24 AM)VA49er Wrote: [ -> ]lulz.....
Fit is usually pretty active with board spamming early in the week.
To to it off, it's about staffers, not even Congress. IMO, just sounds like some staffers were lazy.
New Sheriff in town. New rules.
Maybe THIS will lead to impeaching Trump.
(04-25-2017 11:21 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]The White House announced Monday that it would host an unusual private briefing on North Korea for the entire Senate, prompting questions from lawmakers about whether the Trump administration intends to use the event as a photo op ahead of its 100-day mark.
Linky
I heard they had to remodel a room just for this photo op.
Just because Obama's attitude towards the opposition party was "get in the back seat", does not mean Trump's will be that way.
(04-25-2017 11:53 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe THIS will lead to impeaching Trump.
No THIS will not lead to impeaching of Trump. It's just something that no other president has done to my knowledge so it is newsworthy.
There is a perfectly good secure and safe place for Trump to meet at Capitol Hill so why go through all this trouble to have them meet in the White House?
One can only speculate that it's simply a "100 days" photo op or some sore of Apprentice type promo.
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (04-25-2017 11:53 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe THIS will lead to impeaching Trump.
No THIS will not lead to impeaching of Trump. It's just something that no other president has done to my knowledge so it is newsworthy.
There is a perfectly good secure and safe place for Trump to meet at Capitol Hill so why go through all this trouble to have them meet in the White House?
One can only speculate that it's simply a "100 days" photo op or some sore of Apprentice type promo.
Incorrect. Only someone with some other agenda can only speculate that it's simply a "100 days" photo op or some sort of Apprentice type promo.
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (04-25-2017 11:53 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe THIS will lead to impeaching Trump.
No THIS will not lead to impeaching of Trump. It's just something that no other president has done to my knowledge so it is newsworthy.
There is a perfectly good secure and safe place for Trump to meet at Capitol Hill so why go through all this trouble to have them meet in the White House?
One can only speculate that it's simply a "100 days" photo op or some sore of Apprentice type promo.
Perhaps, but it sure is causing a lot of commotion with the Dimocrat supporters like you.
Yes indeed. I'm absolutely losing my mind. I don't know what to do with myself.
[/quote]
I agree. You should seek help and take Mach with you. I hear this week they're taking two for the price of one. Hurry, don't let it expire.
(04-25-2017 12:23 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]Yes indeed. I'm absolutely losing my mind. I don't know what to do with myself.
I agree. You should seek help and take Mach with you. I hear this week they're taking two for the price of one. Hurry, don't let it expire.
[/quote]
Perhaps you should worry more about politics and less about our personal lives.
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (04-25-2017 11:53 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe THIS will lead to impeaching Trump.
No THIS will not lead to impeaching of Trump. It's just something that no other president has done to my knowledge so it is newsworthy.
Convincing the posters here of impeachment isn't the end goal of your posts?
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]There is a perfectly good secure and safe place for Trump to meet at Capitol Hill so why go through all this trouble to have them meet in the White House?
Your definition of "trouble" is specious.
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]One can only speculate that it's simply a "100 days" photo op or some sore of Apprentice type promo.
You have no evidence of such.
Quote:Convincing the posters here of impeachment isn't the end goal of your posts?
My goal in regards to Trump is to document everything that he has done so as to make it more and more difficult for people on this forum to support him.
Quote:Your definition of "trouble" is specious.
So you don't think it would have been easier for Trump to go over there than for 100 Senators to come to him?
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]One can only speculate that it's simply a "100 days" photo op or some sore of Apprentice type promo.
You have no evidence of such.
[/quote]
Hence the word "speculate".
(04-25-2017 01:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]My goal in regards to Trump is to document everything that he has done so as to make it more and more difficult for people on this forum to support him.
All media and Democrat reactions to Trump in general have all been of the "boy who cried wolf" variety.
Russian meddling in elections? Nothing
Steve Bannon is a Nazi? Nothing
A "lost aircraft carrier?" Nothing
"March for Women?" Nothing
"March for Science?" Nothing
"Too much golfing?" Nothing
"Alternate facts?" Nothing
"Microaggressions?" Nothing
"Gay concentration camps?" Nothing
Democrats aren't interested in what Trump or his supporters have to say, or even in having a reasonable dialog with the President or his supporters. It's nothing but "shut up or we'll shut you up!". This is what the current iteration of dialed-up-to-11 liberal "document everything that he has done" rhetoric is designed to do.
And it is failing. Regular Americans just don't believe liberals anymore.
(04-25-2017 01:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]So you don't think it would have been easier for Trump to go over there than for 100 Senators to come to him?
Are you on the President's security team? Are you part of his advance planning? Maybe, just maybe, it was easier for the President to meet at the White House. That is a perfectly appropriate reason for..........................
meeting at the White House.
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]Hence the word "speculate".
Why did you leave out where you wrote "one can only" speculate?
Because in my cursory understanding of the adjective "only" it means "sole, single, one (and only), solitary, lone, unique; exclusive"
Its a photo op. Its also public proof that the every Senator was informed and briefed by a White House that 5000% more inclusive and law abiding than the O-Bugger-Administration.
(04-25-2017 01:26 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ] (04-25-2017 01:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]My goal in regards to Trump is to document everything that he has done so as to make it more and more difficult for people on this forum to support him.
All media and Democrat reactions to Trump in general have all been of the "boy who cried wolf" variety.
Russian meddling in elections? Nothing
Steve Bannon is a Nazi? Nothing
A "lost aircraft carrier?" Nothing
"March for Women?" Nothing
"March for Science?" Nothing
"Too much golfing?" Nothing
"Alternate facts?" Nothing
"Microaggressions?" Nothing
"Gay concentration camps?" Nothing
Democrats aren't interested in what Trump or his supporters have to say, or even in having a reasonable dialog with the President or his supporters. It's nothing but "shut up or we'll shut you up!". This is what the current iteration of dialed-up-to-11 liberal "document everything that he has done" rhetoric is designed to do.
And it is failing. Regular Americans just don't believe liberals anymore.
(04-25-2017 01:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]So you don't think it would have been easier for Trump to go over there than for 100 Senators to come to him?
Are you on the President's security team? Are you part of his advance planning? Maybe, just maybe, it was easier for the President to meet at the White House. That is a perfectly appropriate reason for..........................meeting at the White House.
(04-25-2017 12:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]Hence the word "speculate".
Why did you leave out where you wrote "one can only" speculate?
Because in my cursory understanding of the adjective "only" it means "sole, single, one (and only), solitary, lone, unique; exclusive"
That's because I was speaking only for myself. However, the fact that this story is out there seems to suggest that I am not the only one who feels that way.
Interesting in how several anti Trump threads end in a question mark.
![[Image: 838f40748770b512c2ac005760529be6_a-meme-...0-399.jpeg]](https://img.memesuper.com/838f40748770b512c2ac005760529be6_a-meme-about-fossils-no-2-god-of-evolution-sticking-tongue-out-meme_600-399.jpeg)