CSNbbs

Full Version: So what we now know about Obama wiretapping Trump
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
1. The surveillance gathered was completely incidental. However, the incidental wiretap was a wiretap on Trump and his transition team.

2. The surveillance gathered had no intelligence importance whatsoever.

3. The surveillance had nothing to do with Russian or Russian ties.

4. Someone took this surveillance, unmasked the names of civilians (it has been confirmed that more people than Flynn were unmasked).

5. Obama relaxed the intelligence walls in his last days in office so that the unmasked people could be leaked by a criminal hack in the Obama administration.

What Nunes is now asking for is:

1. The name of whoever ordered this wiretap and surveillance.

2. The name of the person(s) who unmasked

3. Why congress was not notified that this had happened.


So now we are going to get the drippity drip drip of the infomation on the tappity tap tap from the Obama swampity swamp swamp.
The Dems very well could regret all of their nonsense on this Russian crap.
Do you have pictures of Obama sneaking in to Trump tower.
(03-22-2017 03:07 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]1. The surveillance gathered was completely incidental. However, the incidental wiretap was a wiretap on Trump and his transition team.

2. The surveillance gathered had no intelligence importance whatsoever.

3. The surveillance had nothing to do with Russian or Russian ties.

4. Someone took this surveillance, unmasked the names of civilians (it has been confirmed that more people than Flynn were unmasked).

5. Obama relaxed the intelligence walls in his last days in office so that the unmasked people could be leaked by a criminal hack in the Obama administration.

What Nunes is now asking for is:

1. The name of whoever ordered this wiretap and surveillance.

2. The name of the person(s) who unmasked

3. Why congress was not notified that this had happened.


So now we are going to get the drippity drip drip of the infomation on the tappity tap tap from the Obama swampity swamp swamp.

And apparently the foot draggity drag drag is coming from Comey and FBI. Was only partially listening, but thought he said DNI, NSA and maybe one other had already cooperated or said they would.

Marble mouth might be right back up on Capital Hill in short order.
So with the NSA actively cooperating with Nunes, and the FBI isnt, my guess is that after Comey testified on Monday, some of the FBI agents called bull**** on him and decided to go around him.
(03-22-2017 04:34 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]So with the NSA actively cooperating with Nunes, and the FBI isnt, my guess is that after Comey testified on Monday, some of the FBI agents called bull**** on him and decided to go around him.

I don't get it. Comey practically handed the election to Trump by stating, 2 days before the election, that Hillary was under investigation again. All the polls (and the media tone) showed a large shift towards Trump after that.

And now Comey is said to be spying on Trump, or at the very least obstructing the investigation into who spied on Trump? What's up with this guy?
What we know is that Trump wasn't wiretapped, and that he is a liar.
(03-22-2017 03:10 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]The Dems very well could regret all of their nonsense on this Russian crap.
I said at the beginning the leak was the bigger deal and it would backfire.
(03-22-2017 04:51 PM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ]What we know is that Trump wasn't wiretapped, and that he is a liar.
We know he was wiretapped and all politicians are liars.

Reality
You guys are delusional.

Facts are Trump is a liar.
You are about to be able to trip over the puffy lower lip of liberal kiddos.
(03-22-2017 04:57 PM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ]We know he was wiretapped and all politicians are liars.

Trump lied about Obama wiretapping him. It has been proven that did not happen.
(03-22-2017 04:59 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]You guys are delusional.

Facts are Trump is a liar.

You calling someone delusional...03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao
(03-22-2017 04:51 PM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ]What we know is that Trump wasn't wiretapped, and that he is a liar.

What we know is you know less than nothing and you continue to prove it to this board daily.
(03-22-2017 04:49 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote: [ -> ]I don't get it. Comey practically handed the election to Trump by stating, 2 days before the election, that Hillary was under investigation again. All the polls (and the media tone) showed a large shift towards Trump after that.

And now Comey is said to be spying on Trump, or at the very least obstructing the investigation into who spied on Trump? What's up with this guy?

Maybe Comey is a swamp critter.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-813051.html
(03-22-2017 04:59 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]You guys are delusional.

Facts are Trump is a liar.

Well-now we know why Obama never denied there being a wire tap. He just said "the white house had a policy against spying on US citizens". If you notice, he also didn't deny violating that policy. He also didn't deny knowing about the tap, receiving info from the tap, or passing that info on. Now that we know there was a tap--the Bamster has some splainin to do.
Just caught a roundtable segment on Fox News. It sounds like some of the journalists are starting to put some of the pieces together.

The biggest piece they are now linking is that Obama relaxed the rules for the intelligence agencies to see this information.

So now its starting to become less foggy. And its clear Obama is going to have to testify under oath why he relaxed those safeguards. And Lynch and Susan Rice will probably get called/subpoenaed as well.

NSA is cooperating now. The FBI is not.
(03-22-2017 04:51 PM)MplsBison Wrote: [ -> ]What we know is that Trump wasn't wiretapped, and that he is a liar.

Source?
(03-22-2017 05:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]Just caught a roundtable segment on Fox News. It sounds like some of the journalists are starting to put some of the pieces together.

The biggest piece they are now linking is that Obama relaxed the rules for the intelligence agencies to see this information.

So now its starting to become less foggy. And its clear Obama is going to have to testify under oath why he relaxed those safeguards. And Lynch and Susan Rice will probably get called/subpoenaed as well.

NSA is cooperating now. The FBI is not.

Its always the cover up that gets 'em.
(03-22-2017 06:00 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: [ -> ]Source?

Devin Nunes
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Reference URL's