CSNbbs

(11-25-2016 04:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-25-2016 04:02 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]Clemson game was only close b/c Clemson RB Gallman was knocked out early though, plus 4 turnovers.

but NC State didn't lsoe the game when the kicker missed the FG to win it. they lost it in overtime.

On paper Clemson should be beating teams like State, Pitt etc. by three or four TDs.

Clemson would have beat Pitt by 3 or 4 TDs if the refs had not made so many bad calls on 3rd and long passes by Pitt. on 4 of their TD drives, they got a call on 3rd and long that gave them a first down. in most gamses, at least 3 of those are not called and they are punting.

i think it is easy for you to say Clemson should be beating teams by x amount of points but you don't play in the games.

How many teams can say those same "ifs" & "buts" CV? Could've, should've, would've. How many more excuses can you come up with?

(11-25-2016 10:23 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote: [ -> ]How many teams can say those same "ifs" & "buts" CV? Could've, should've, would've. How many more excuses can you come up with?

i don't get how a guy who has complained about calls in the Clemson game all season is complaining about me talking about bad calls in another game that didn't involve Loiusivlle..

Clemson beat NC State btw, the excuses are people who say NC State should have won that game. why didn't they in overtime.

(11-26-2016 04:03 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-25-2016 10:23 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote: [ -> ]How many teams can say those same "ifs" & "buts" CV? Could've, should've, would've. How many more excuses can you come up with?

i don't get how a guy who has complained about calls in the Clemson game all season is complaining about me talking about bad calls in another game that didn't involve Loiusivlle..

Clemson beat NC State btw, the excuses are people who say NC State should have won that game. why didn't they in overtime.

When have I ever said that the refs cost Louisville the game against Clemson? Or even complained? I've said there were bad calls on both sides. Clemson won the game, a close game. Hats off to Clemson.

You are the one of who has blamed the refs for costing Clemson the Pitt game & keep making excuses as to why other games were close but you don't acknowledge other teams having similar problems. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. I don't know how to make it any simpler for you to understand.

Happy thanksgiving & go beat SC.

you are stuck on this 'making excuses' platitude. it is like y ou think it is illegal for people to talk about bad calls in a game. why do you have to constantly harrass me? you keep posting the same 'making excuses' thing over and over, i understand what your position is. why do you have to keep posting it? obviously it hasn't stopped me from talking about the bad calls int he Pitt game. i think it is a good excuse, four bad calls on 3rd and long pass plays bailed out Pitt's offense on 4 different drives. that team is obviously capable of scoring a lot of points so when the ref is bailing them out over and over on 3rd and long, that is a big blow to the team trying to stop them.

(11-26-2016 04:36 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]you are stuck on this 'making excuses' platitude. it is like y ou think it is illegal for people to talk about bad calls in a game. why do you have to constantly harrass me? you keep posting the same 'making excuses' thing over and over, i understand what your position is. why do you have to keep posting it? obviously it hasn't stopped me from talking about the bad calls int he Pitt game. i think it is a good excuse, four bad calls on 3rd and long pass plays bailed out Pitt's offense on 4 different drives. that team is obviously capable of scoring a lot of points so when the ref is bailing them out over and over on 3rd and long, that is a big blow to the team trying to stop them.

Sorry you feel harassed, I thought it was a discussion. Looking at at least 1 of the replays I don't think that it was a bad call. Since you feel harassed then let's agree to disagree & move on. I'll be cheering for Clemson to win the national championship.

(11-26-2016 04:46 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-26-2016 04:36 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]you are stuck on this 'making excuses' platitude. it is like y ou think it is illegal for people to talk about bad calls in a game. why do you have to constantly harrass me? you keep posting the same 'making excuses' thing over and over, i understand what your position is. why do you have to keep posting it? obviously it hasn't stopped me from talking about the bad calls int he Pitt game. i think it is a good excuse, four bad calls on 3rd and long pass plays bailed out Pitt's offense on 4 different drives. that team is obviously capable of scoring a lot of points so when the ref is bailing them out over and over on 3rd and long, that is a big blow to the team trying to stop them.

Sorry you feel harassed, I thought it was a discussion. Looking at at least 1 of the replays I don't think that it was a bad call. Since you feel harassed then let's agree to disagree & move on. I'll be cheering for Clemson to win the national championship.

Clemson would be left out of the CFP at 11-2.

(11-26-2016 04:36 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]you are stuck on this 'making excuses' platitude. it is like y ou think it is illegal for people to talk about bad calls in a game. why do you have to constantly harrass me? you keep posting the same 'making excuses' thing over and over, i understand what your position is. why do you have to keep posting it? obviously it hasn't stopped me from talking about the bad calls int he Pitt game. i think it is a good excuse, four bad calls on 3rd and long pass plays bailed out Pitt's offense on 4 different drives. that team is obviously capable of scoring a lot of points so when the ref is bailing them out over and over on 3rd and long, that is a big blow to the team trying to stop them.

The refs did not bail out Pitt nearly as much as Clemson did. I don't know why you refuse to accept that reality? Also, there were several bad/questionable calls that went against Pitt as well. Naturally, you just refuse to acknowledge that.

It's all good. Whatever gets you through the night...

(11-25-2016 06:50 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-25-2016 04:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-25-2016 04:02 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]Clemson game was only close b/c Clemson RB Gallman was knocked out early though, plus 4 turnovers.

but NC State didn't lsoe the game when the kicker missed the FG to win it. they lost it in overtime.

On paper Clemson should be beating teams like State, Pitt etc. by three or four TDs.

Clemson would have beat Pitt by 3 or 4 TDs if the refs had not made so many bad calls on 3rd and long passes by Pitt. on 4 of their TD drives, they got a call on 3rd and long that gave them a first down. in most gamses, at least 3 of those are not called and they are punting.

i think it is easy for you to say Clemson should be beating teams by x amount of points but you don't play in the games.

Clemson has better coaches, athletes, and depth. Whatever way you want to frame it, they got beat by Pitt and nearly got beat by State.

(11-27-2016 03:38 PM)dawgitall Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-25-2016 06:50 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-25-2016 04:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-25-2016 04:02 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]Clemson game was only close b/c Clemson RB Gallman was knocked out early though, plus 4 turnovers.

but NC State didn't lsoe the game when the kicker missed the FG to win it. they lost it in overtime.

On paper Clemson should be beating teams like State, Pitt etc. by three or four TDs.

Clemson would have beat Pitt by 3 or 4 TDs if the refs had not made so many bad calls on 3rd and long passes by Pitt. on 4 of their TD drives, they got a call on 3rd and long that gave them a first down. in most gamses, at least 3 of those are not called and they are punting.

i think it is easy for you to say Clemson should be beating teams by x amount of points but you don't play in the games.

Clemson has better coaches, athletes, and depth. Whatever way you want to frame it, they got beat by Pitt and nearly got beat by State.

Clemson got nearly beat by State due to 4 turnovers and our star RB being out. i'm just putting the game in context. your point would be better if your kicker was a good kicker who had an off game but he's consistently bad. NC State had the opportunity to win at in overtime and lost. i don't understand why the need to continue to talk about close the score was.

Dayes is easily better than any of our backup RBs.

(11-27-2016 03:27 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-26-2016 04:36 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]you are stuck on this 'making excuses' platitude. it is like y ou think it is illegal for people to talk about bad calls in a game. why do you have to constantly harrass me? you keep posting the same 'making excuses' thing over and over, i understand what your position is. why do you have to keep posting it? obviously it hasn't stopped me from talking about the bad calls int he Pitt game. i think it is a good excuse, four bad calls on 3rd and long pass plays bailed out Pitt's offense on 4 different drives. that team is obviously capable of scoring a lot of points so when the ref is bailing them out over and over on 3rd and long, that is a big blow to the team trying to stop them.

The refs did not bail out Pitt nearly as much as Clemson did. I don't know why you refuse to accept that reality? Also, there were several bad/questionable calls that went against Pitt as well. Naturally, you just refuse to acknowledge that.

It's all good. Whatever gets you through the night...

ok. only one i've seen claimed is the fumble by gallman near the endzone that was overturned. appears Pitt fans wanted yet another bad call by the refs on the field to stand. i'll spot you that TD if you spot me the 4 bad PI / holding calls on 3rd and long passes, which helped Pitt continue drives that led to 28 of their points. and also overturn that horrible personal foul call on Boulware, which would have forced Pitt to kick a FG.

our defense was clutch in that Pitt game on 3rd and long but refs bailed out Pitt. those passes were not even good passes, the announcer joked on one of them that pitt just needs to get it in the vincity of the WR to get a flag.

Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Keep up the good fight Honey Boo Boo!

(11-27-2016 04:19 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ]Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Keep up the good fight Honey Boo Boo!

you the only person in the world who thinks this honey boo boo thing is funny so you might want to take your little quote to heart. posting it over and over isn't going to make it funny. i know that you need attention and you can't get it by posting what you think about various topics so you stalk and harrass me on here, etc.

(11-27-2016 05:36 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-27-2016 04:19 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ]Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Keep up the good fight Honey Boo Boo!

you the only person in the world who thinks this honey boo boo thing is funny so you might want to take your little quote to heart. posting it over and over isn't going to make it funny.

The exact same thing could be said about you and your incessant whining about the officiating in the Pitt game. The big difference is everybody knows I'm joking while you are dead serious.

(11-27-2016 05:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-27-2016 05:36 PM)ClemVegas Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-27-2016 04:19 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ]Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Keep up the good fight Honey Boo Boo!

you the only person in the world who thinks this honey boo boo thing is funny so you might want to take your little quote to heart. posting it over and over isn't going to make it funny.

The exact same thing could be said about you and your incessant whining about the officiating in the Pitt game. The big difference is everybody knows I'm joking while you are dead serious.

i would say you and others whine about me talking about bad calls in that game. why is it o k for you to whine about me talking about something but i can't 'whine' about calls in a game? Why don't you put down your baseball bat. you act like a thug. why do you care if I talk calls in the Pitt game. you were whining about the coaches and the players in the game but for some reason if i talk about the refs, that is a thought crime.

you aren't funny at all. your humor is like middle school level.

i think you have this queen bee syndrome, , you want to be the no. 1 Clemson person this website and you think i threaten your status or something. you are the True Clemson Fan. you representing Clemson nation accurately, as you see. true Clemson fans don't complain about bad calls in a game. lol

anyway, i'm gonna stop responding to you because you are an attention whore troll. basically i wish Clemson would lose every game after I interact with you.

I'm not whining, I'm mocking you. You look like a fool and fools deserve mocking.

this fool actually went to Clemson. if you smarter than me, why don't you root for the college that you actually attended. lol i guess newberry community college doesn't field a great team. lol

you are the biggest whiner and negative person on this website. you always whining about the ACC scehdule, revenue, friday night games,. you are a debbie downer type. then you call me a whiner. if Dabo loses some games next year, you will no doubt want to fire him. i know what kind of fan you are.

And when one tired old failed argument fails you resort to another.

It's dinner time. I bet Mama June has your Sketti ready so go eat.

(11-27-2016 06:16 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ]And when one tired old failed argument fails you resort to another.

It's dinner time. I bet Mama June has your Sketti ready so go eat.

my opinion, being a SuperFan of a college that I did not attend seems dumb. if i didn't go to any college, then i wouldn't be a fan of any college. if you lived in Pickens or Anderson county near Clemson, i could understand it somewhat.

it is odd how you say you are smarter than me but I actually attended the college that you are a superfan of but didn't attend. you ought to post your resume on here so people can decide for themselves how impressive you are.

You like to make the statement that myself (and others) claim to be the best Clemson fan but the only person who ever tries to have a willy measuring contest around here is you.

As for my resume, it's been posted plenty of times. Why don't you post yours, including when you attended your first Clemson athletic contest in person.