CSNbbs

Full Version: Hate Targeting rule
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Not rooting for either team. The targeting call verse Miami was BS. If close, ref should not call since booth can call down to field. Targeting should be obvious not questionable. 03-banghead
(10-08-2016 10:53 PM)msm96wolf Wrote: [ -> ]Not rooting for either team. The targeting call verse Miami was BS. If close, ref should not call since booth can call down to field. Targeting should be obvious not questionable. 03-banghead
Dirtiest football game I've ever watched and I remember the old games. This game took it to a whole new level. Awful
The problem with the rule is it is unfairly and inconsistently administered from game to game and differently in each conference! 07-coffee3
(10-08-2016 10:53 PM)msm96wolf Wrote: [ -> ]Not rooting for either team. The targeting call verse Miami was BS. If close, ref should not call since booth can call down to field. Targeting should be obvious not questionable. 03-banghead

Agreed ... makes no sense to me.
(10-08-2016 11:13 PM)Ole Blue Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-08-2016 10:53 PM)msm96wolf Wrote: [ -> ]Not rooting for either team. The targeting call verse Miami was BS. If close, ref should not call since booth can call down to field. Targeting should be obvious not questionable. 03-banghead

Agreed ... makes no sense to me.

And yet they allow bcks and receivers lead with their heads into would be tacklers penalty free! 07-coffee3
Reference URL's