CSNbbs

Full Version: Here's what the "No PC" movement is starting to produce
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Candidates like Rev. Dan Johnson (R-KY).

http://www.whas11.com/news/politics/elec.../328622355
He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.
I wasn't aware there was a "No PC" movement.

Can you provide a link so I can send them a donation.
(10-05-2016 05:18 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote: [ -> ]I wasn't aware there was a "No PC" movement.

Can you provide a link so I can send them a donation.

No doubt. I might even hold a fundraiser.
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Lord Stanley pile drives Tommy.


Omg! Love this guy!!
He's just practicing His Freedom of speech. If He had one of those leftwing Bush as a Chimpanzee photos some of You leftwing Clucks would have Him run for POTUS. At least He doesnt have a trail of bodies of aquaintences in His wake like a certain clan from Arkansas/ NY/Chicago appear to have.
GOP only care about self preservation, where this guy may be a negative drag on other candidates. The Dems only care about exploiting an opportunity to gain elected offices. Neither party gives a sh!t about the actual content of his FB page. The biggest news that I find surprising is that this guy is a preacher. Is that for real or is he a faux preacher like Jesse Jackson?
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign. Go beat up peaceful protestors. No problem. DJT promises to pay your bills. Say anything no matter what, and its all excused in the name of 'no PC'.
(10-05-2016 10:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign

Maybe push back? Just spit balling here.
Whaaaaaat? 3% of anything is not "normal ",... is it.

What a hypocrite you are Tommie.
(10-05-2016 10:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign. Go beat up peaceful protestors. No problem. DJT promises to pay your bills. Say anything no matter what, and its all excused in the name of 'no PC'.


Bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha you sure you want to go down this road?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(10-05-2016 10:06 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote: [ -> ]Whaaaaaat? 3% of anything is not "normal ",... is it.

What a hypocrite you are Tommie.

Is that another off topic attack on my sexual orientation?
(10-05-2016 10:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign. Go beat up peaceful protestors. No problem. DJT promises to pay your bills. Say anything no matter what, and its all excused in the name of 'no PC'.






(10-05-2016 10:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign. Go beat up peaceful protestors. No problem. DJT promises to pay your bills. Say anything no matter what, and its all excused in the name of 'no PC'.

Hunh. 07-coffee3

Tell me again, how many Trump "protesters" have shot someone cold in the back of the head during one of their "Rally's"? Burned schit? Destroyed cars, CVS', or hotels?

Talk about normalizing degeneracy. Keep it up. See where it lands you.

I've seen it, you've seen it. So, yea.
(10-05-2016 10:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign.

At least it isn't degeneracy.
(10-06-2016 12:33 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 10:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign.

At least it isn't degeneracy.

Again, another off topic attack on my sexual orientation. Do ANY of you have any ideas at all?

Seriously, why not just change the forum name to "Smear the Queer".
(10-06-2016 12:44 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Seriously, why not just change the forum name to "Smear the Queer".

You know we love you, Tom.
(10-06-2016 12:44 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-06-2016 12:33 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 10:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-05-2016 05:08 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]He's a private citizen running for office. If he is offensive to the voters, he won't win the election. The problem solves itself.

But this constant liberal demand for conformity of thought, almost always under the label “political correctness,” is more dangerous than some hillbilly racist running for office who has little if any chance of winning.

Trump is normalizing this type of campaign.

At least it isn't degeneracy.

Again, another off topic attack on my sexual orientation. Do ANY of you have any ideas at all?

Seriously, why not just change the forum name to "Smear the Queer".

I love that game. Ow that it's turned to Autumn my son and I will be playing it.
(10-06-2016 01:12 AM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-06-2016 12:44 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Seriously, why not just change the forum name to "Smear the Queer".

You know we love you, Tom.

Nothing worse than a 1st world cry baby.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Reference URL's