More tackles for shareef and genard!
We already have this thread
(09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
(09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
(09-17-2016 09:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
Then they played a win less fcs team and didnt run on them either
(09-17-2016 09:19 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
Then they played a win less fcs team and didnt run on them either
But they went into this weeks game intending to be run heavy to control clock and keep the MTSU offense off the field. MTSU was top 10 in nation in total offense coming into game.
(09-17-2016 10:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:19 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
Then they played a win less fcs team and didnt run on them either
But they went into this weeks game intending to be run heavy to control clock and keep the MTSU offense off the field. MTSU was top 10 in nation in total offense coming into game.
well they did a poor job MTSU scored 40+ points
(09-17-2016 10:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:19 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
Then they played a win less fcs team and didnt run on them either
But they went into this weeks game intending to be run heavy to control clock and keep the MTSU offense off the field. MTSU was top 10 in nation in total offense coming into game.
Maybe they should have gone into the game intending on scoring more points than their opponent. I know it's early in the season but through week 3, teams that have outscored their opponents are undefeated.
(09-17-2016 10:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:19 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
Then they played a win less fcs team and didnt run on them either
But they went into this weeks game intending to be run heavy to control clock and keep the MTSU offense off the field. MTSU was top 10 in nation in total offense coming into game.
you are so butt hurt about your boyfriend leaving you want the worst for the Tigers. Why don't you just leave the board.
(09-17-2016 11:35 PM)Davidofmtp Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 10:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:19 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ]Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
Then they played a win less fcs team and didnt run on them either
But they went into this weeks game intending to be run heavy to control clock and keep the MTSU offense off the field. MTSU was top 10 in nation in total offense coming into game.
you are so butt hurt about your boyfriend leaving you want the worst for the Tigers. Why don't you just leave the board.
What the F are you talking about? You starting to sound like an old fart under an fourth screen name after getting banned three other times.
Stick to Nascar. The entertainment value is the same as turning a light on and off.
(09-17-2016 10:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:19 PM)MemphisFan95 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 09:14 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:46 PM)mairving Wrote: [ -> ] (09-17-2016 07:42 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks as if they are a rushing team this season. Two runners over 100 yards today in their 41-21 loss to MTSU. Team had over 300 yards rushing. Still fast paced team with 93 plays in today's game.
http://www.bgsufalcons.com/boxscore.aspx...ll&id=7750
Before today they were 123rd in rushing offense. Wouldn't call that a rushing team.
They opened with Ohio St and no one runs on them.
Then they played a win less fcs team and didnt run on them either
But they went into this weeks game intending to be run heavy to control clock and keep the MTSU offense off the field. MTSU was top 10 in nation in total offense coming into game.
Are you sure that was the plan?
You think their plan was to run the ball to keep MTSU off the field...Seriously. You let the play clock run down if you want to keep an offense off the field. You even admit to them playing fast but their strategy was to keep them off the field? You don't limit another teams offensive possessions by playing fast?
Dude I can appreciate the fact that you are trying to quote facts but please interpret them correctly.