they have a board with a thread predicting the score. as expected, most of them having UK winning. however, the "tiebreaker" is UK rushing yards. you wouldn't believe how many people have them rushing for over 250 yards. lol. virtually everyone has them rushing for over 200. they may win the game, but I don't see 250, 200 or 175 yards rushing for UK, much less 275+ like some of those people think.
Poor Kentucky fans are in for a rude awakening. Will be a long weekend for that crowd.
(08-25-2016 10:57 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote: [ -> ]they have a board with a thread predicting the score. as expected, most of them having UK winning. however, the "tiebreaker" is UK rushing yards. you wouldn't believe how many people have them rushing for over 250 yards. lol. virtually everyone has them rushing for over 200. they may win the game, but I don't see 250, 200 or 175 yards rushing for UK, much less 275+ like some of those people think.
Poor Kentucky fans are in for a rude awakening. Will be a long weekend for that crowd.
Maybe..maybe not...as stated in another thread, why should they be too concerned, based on our poor track record against them?
As Corch Carmody always said, "we respect all, fear none".....So go there head high, acting as if we've been in this situation before.....and get outta there with a win, even if we give up 400 yds rushing.
They have 2 pretty good backs. Boom Williams and JoJo Kemp. Gotta keep those guys in check.
Boom Williams can fly. If he makes a couple guys miss, they could get 80 in one play. I don't care how many rushing yards we give up. Just win.
(08-25-2016 10:57 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote: [ -> ]however, the "tiebreaker" is UK rushing yards. you wouldn't believe how many people have them rushing for over 250 yards. lol. virtually everyone has them rushing for over 200.
Washington was an average P5 team and they ran all over our defense last year.
It isn't that ridiculous a prediction.
(08-25-2016 11:10 PM)BeagleUSM Wrote: [ -> ]They have 2 pretty good backs. Boom Williams and JoJo Kemp. Gotta keep those guys in check.
it's no different than scheming against la tech/marshall last year.....we have to make their inexperienced qb pull the trigger....\
to the OP....I skimmed their boards and saw the same thing.....lucky for us, this ain't hoops
southern miss 36 ky jello 20
(08-26-2016 01:13 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (08-25-2016 10:57 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote: [ -> ]however, the "tiebreaker" is UK rushing yards. you wouldn't believe how many people have them rushing for over 250 yards. lol. virtually everyone has them rushing for over 200.
Washington was an average P5 team and they ran all over our defense last year.
It isn't that ridiculous a prediction.
we were hurt....
(08-26-2016 01:13 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (08-25-2016 10:57 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote: [ -> ]however, the "tiebreaker" is UK rushing yards. you wouldn't believe how many people have them rushing for over 250 yards. lol. virtually everyone has them rushing for over 200.
Washington was an average P5 team and they ran all over our defense last year.
It isn't that ridiculous a prediction.
Actually, by seasons end...when we played them....they were an above average P5 team. Thats one reason they are ranked preseason so high this year. Also, i think our defense will be much improved this year. We will find out in a week or so.
(08-26-2016 08:39 AM)Reggie Favre Wrote: [ -> ] (08-26-2016 01:13 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (08-25-2016 10:57 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote: [ -> ]however, the "tiebreaker" is UK rushing yards. you wouldn't believe how many people have them rushing for over 250 yards. lol. virtually everyone has them rushing for over 200.
Washington was an average P5 team and they ran all over our defense last year.
It isn't that ridiculous a prediction.
Actually, by seasons end...when we played them....they were an above average P5 team. Thats one reason they are ranked preseason so high this year. Also, i think our defense will be much improved this year. We will find out in a week or so.
they beat our arse....and again we were wounded....they took advantage of that as they should have...
disclaimer: there is no shame how that game played out.....nor is it a slam on Wash or our players that were available....
Not to mention we lost starting LB Brian Anderson and a couple of other backups because they skipped on cab fare and played without Jalen Richard.
(08-26-2016 12:35 PM)southernbirds67 Wrote: [ -> ]Not to mention we lost starting LB Brian Anderson and a couple of other backups because they skipped on cab fare and played without Jalen Richard.
And I'll throw in the fact we had a rookie OC calling the plays as the one calling them all season (Lindsey) had already left for Arizona St.
(08-26-2016 03:37 PM)usm99 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-26-2016 12:35 PM)southernbirds67 Wrote: [ -> ]Not to mention we lost starting LB Brian Anderson and a couple of other backups because they skipped on cab fare and played without Jalen Richard.
And I'll throw in the fact we had a rookie OC calling the plays as the one calling them all season (Lindsey) had already left for Arizona St.
Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner folks!
(08-26-2016 04:50 PM)southernbirds67 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-26-2016 03:37 PM)usm99 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-26-2016 12:35 PM)southernbirds67 Wrote: [ -> ]Not to mention we lost starting LB Brian Anderson and a couple of other backups because they skipped on cab fare and played without Jalen Richard.
And I'll throw in the fact we had a rookie OC calling the plays as the one calling them all season (Lindsey) had already left for Arizona St.
Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner folks!
really???? and still scored over thirty.....
ummmmmmkay.....
Well, in a week we will know...