CSNbbs

Full Version: CBS Sports rankings
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Eh, something to pass the time waiting on the season. AAC rankings along with selected other G5 teams. They've got some of our lower projected teams too low.

http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...-rankings/

14. Houston
28. Boise State
30. USF
34. Southern Miss
36. Navy
37. SDSU
39. WKU
46. Temple
60. Memphis
66. Tulsa
73. Cincinnati
76. UConn
104. Tulane
109. ECU
110. SMU
117. UCF
Absurdity
I didn't know southern miss was suppose to be this good
(08-10-2016 03:51 PM)IAH Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't know southern miss was suppose to be this good

I guess the SEC had a lot of academic dropouts in 2014.
#49 NIU

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
I agree with the low teams being too low. I'll take Tulsa at 66 though. Seems about right to start the season.
#54 GaSouthern
(08-10-2016 03:51 PM)IAH Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't know southern miss was suppose to be this good

If the new coach can build off of last years team.... Southern Miss should be damn good, but any time a coaching change is made is like rolling dice
(08-10-2016 03:38 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote: [ -> ]Eh, something to pass the time waiting on the season. AAC rankings along with selected other G5 teams. They've got some of our lower projected teams too low.

http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...-rankings/

14. Houston
28. Boise State
30. USF
34. Southern Miss
36. Navy
37. SDSU
39. WKU
46. Temple
60. Memphis
66. Tulsa
73. Cincinnati
76. UConn
104. Tulane
109. ECU
110. SMU
117. UCF

I think Masrhall and Middle TN should be a little lower (45 range) I'm really curious what Navy will look like post the Rynalds era. I thought Navy lost way to much to be ranked that high.
Tulsa is the second best team in the league by a mile.
(08-10-2016 08:16 PM)panicstricken Wrote: [ -> ]Tulsa is the second best team in the league by a mile.

Wait. You posted this and didn't point out that Tulsa is ranked higher than UC? You've lost it, man. I mean, not that you ever really had it.
(08-10-2016 08:16 PM)panicstricken Wrote: [ -> ]Tulsa is the second best team in the league by a mile.
Are you for real????
I dont need to rub it in or crush your spirit.

I am content to let Gunner and Tubbs do that for me.
UCF fans know better than most not to take Tulsa lightly.
(08-10-2016 03:48 PM)NBPirate Wrote: [ -> ]Absurdity

Agreed. Surprised UCF is ranked so high.
All trolling aside..

Tulsa is going to be really good.

Im going with 9-3 with losses @ OSU, @ UH and @ Navy.

That should be good enough for 2nd Place in the west.
Sports Illustrated Top 25.

8. Houston

http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/...5-rankings
[Image: hell-naw.gif]
UCF will not be that bad. No way. They'll be 80th at worst and probably closer to 60.
Would be interesting to see where we would've been picked in all these pre-season deals if media darling Ruff was still here. EXACT same team he would've had this year, minus a QB who may not have even been starting this year even if he still was here.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Reference URL's