CSNbbs

Woman that was butchered in London last night?

What reason do you have to think that his reaction would be any less outraged than anyone else?

Why did you feel compelled to start a new thread to ask such an absurd and offensive question?

(08-04-2016 09:43 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]offensive

It was a rhetorical question, not that I can't comprehend your (almost certainly invalid) reasons, but rather passing judgement on them.

It should be noted that "Khan" is ambiguous in this case because while Kazir Khan is in the news, the mayor of London is Sadiq Khan. My assumption is that by using the title "Mr. Khan", the reference is to Kazir Khan.

(08-04-2016 09:43 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]What reason do you have to think that his reaction would be any less outraged than anyone else?

Why did you feel compelled to start a new thread to ask such an absurd and offensive question?

Because despite what Khans son did, he thinks Islam is a religion of hate.

(08-05-2016 05:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-04-2016 09:43 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]What reason do you have to think that his reaction would be any less outraged than anyone else?

Why did you feel compelled to start a new thread to ask such an absurd and offensive question?

Because despite what Khans son did, he thinks Islam is a religion of hate.

Can you name another religion where radical followers have killed over a thousand people in the past 30 days?

(08-05-2016 05:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-04-2016 09:43 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]What reason do you have to think that his reaction would be any less outraged than anyone else?

Why did you feel compelled to start a new thread to ask such an absurd and offensive question?

Because despite what Khans son did, he thinks Islam is a religion of hate.

Maybe because it is a religion of hate. And terrorism. And murder. And subjugation.

(08-04-2016 09:43 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]What reason do you have to think that his reaction would be any less outraged than anyone else?

Why did you feel compelled to start a new thread to ask such an absurd and offensive question?

a mix of racism, islamaphobia, xenophobia, ignorance, and bigotry.

Polling of Muslims does show they generally are far less outraged than the rest of us, so, not really a far fetched question.

Allah akbar

(08-05-2016 07:12 PM)Paul M Wrote: [ -> ]Polling of Muslims does show they generally are far less outraged than the rest of us, so, not really a far fetched question.

Americans are far less outraged than other countries when it comes to the US killing innocent civilians with drones. So what's the difference?

A counter question to the op: what has this individual done or said to make you think that he may not feel like the rest of us on this?

(08-05-2016 06:40 PM)Kaplony Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-05-2016 05:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-04-2016 09:43 AM)I45owl Wrote: [ -> ]What reason do you have to think that his reaction would be any less outraged than anyone else?

Why did you feel compelled to start a new thread to ask such an absurd and offensive question?

Because despite what Khans son did, he thinks Islam is a religion of hate.

Can you name another religion where radical followers have killed over a thousand people in the past 30 days?

Perhaps not in the last 30 days but many religions have had radicals within their ranks kill throughout history. It doesnt make their religion a religion of hate.

A few hundred years ago, Christians used their religious beliefs to enslave Native Americans and African Americans, does that make them a religion of hate?

What year is this Fit?

(08-06-2016 09:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]A few hundred years ago, Christians used their religious beliefs to enslave Native Americans and African Americans, does that make them a religion of hate?

Spare us the false equivalency.

SOME Christians did back then. Does that apply to those Christians back then? Perhaps.

OTHER Christians led the fight to end that practice. Does that apply to those Christians back then? Of course not.

With respect to Native Americans, we still have issues. Biggest problem is that they don't have enough votes for anybody to care about them.

Does what happened hundreds of years ago indict Christians today? Of course not.

Does what happened in the last 30 days apply to Christians today? Absolutely.

Does what SOME Muslims have done within the last 30 days indict them? Of course it does.

But here's the $64,000 question. Where are the OTHER Muslims to take a stand like those OTHER Christians did way back then?

[attachment=8164]
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Mus...43172.html