watch how they react to backing this political gamble that is now a loser...
they're next....
when the major player exits, the rest are most certain to follow....
I'll take it all the way to coalition amongst the money players turning sand to glass as the next macro move....that money thingy.....one just can't dodge city that in today's world....
and the muslim cultural invasion is once again reigning supreme in similar compare/constrast to the black migration in 'murica as it began or how the crusades played out...
understanding the fight is the main reason religion is not best method....
conceptually, hisler and the 'church' both have it right.....it was just the wrong time period and method as a final solution....
today's viewpoint should focus more on how to survive collectively....and that's why the communism walls are falling across the world and Trump sees building one as a solution.....i
it's pretty easy to understand how socialist views only yield to the 'irrational' relative to only understanding viewing one portion of the equation en micro like any 'religious right' will only ever accomplish in the 1/0
one has to answer is it about me or all as the truth in decision.....
I've lived and studied behavior long enough to understand that part of the equation.....
FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
(06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
(06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
just like the U.S. after ww-deuce....
it's fun givin' shite away....
didn't ya get the memo?
Hey, Maybe We can get a European Realignment board started on CSNbbs.com !
(06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Bwahahahaha... yeah...
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
(06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
Ignoring 2 world wars and a Holocaust... England's fault!
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
(06-28-2016 05:24 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
Ignoring 2 world wars and a Holocaust... England's fault!
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Hitler is a direct result of insisting on destroying the existing social and political order of Germany after the First World War, and a treaty that was about punishment and humiliation instead of ensuring peace. Britain could have stopped the silliness anytime at Versailles in 1919 and looked the other way, so did Wilson. Otherwise a second world war in Europe is a low possibility (and probably would have been started by Uncle Joe), and there certainly would have been no Holocaust. World War I is the start of all 20th Century evils.
(06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
And once again history will repeat itself.
(06-28-2016 11:22 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-28-2016 05:24 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
Ignoring 2 world wars and a Holocaust... England's fault!
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Hitler is a direct result of insisting on destroying the existing social and political order of Germany after the First World War, and a treaty that was about punishment and humiliation instead of ensuring peace. Britain could have stopped the silliness anytime at Versailles in 1919 and looked the other way, so did Wilson. Otherwise a second world war in Europe is a low possibility (and probably would have been started by Uncle Joe), and there certainly would have been no Holocaust. World War I is the start of all 20th Century evils.
Cant say I blame them after just going through WWI. The Brits had only lost 1.2M people in the previous 4 years due to the war... For a war they didnt want in the first place...
If Germany didnt think the treaty was fair, then they shouldnt have picked the fight in the first place.
The Brits are from Europe but not of Europe and never have been.
It's no surprise the Germans misread them.
(06-28-2016 02:26 PM)muffinman Wrote: [ -> ] (06-28-2016 11:22 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-28-2016 05:24 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
Ignoring 2 world wars and a Holocaust... England's fault!
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Hitler is a direct result of insisting on destroying the existing social and political order of Germany after the First World War, and a treaty that was about punishment and humiliation instead of ensuring peace. Britain could have stopped the silliness anytime at Versailles in 1919 and looked the other way, so did Wilson. Otherwise a second world war in Europe is a low possibility (and probably would have been started by Uncle Joe), and there certainly would have been no Holocaust. World War I is the start of all 20th Century evils.
Cant say I blame them after just going through WWI. The Brits had only lost 1.2M people in the previous 4 years due to the war... For a war they didnt want in the first place...
If Germany didnt think the treaty was fair, then they shouldnt have picked the fight in the first place.
Straight out of British propaganda. Germany did the same thing Britain did, honor their treaties.
(06-28-2016 02:43 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-28-2016 02:26 PM)muffinman Wrote: [ -> ] (06-28-2016 11:22 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-28-2016 05:24 AM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ]Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
Ignoring 2 world wars and a Holocaust... England's fault!
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Hitler is a direct result of insisting on destroying the existing social and political order of Germany after the First World War, and a treaty that was about punishment and humiliation instead of ensuring peace. Britain could have stopped the silliness anytime at Versailles in 1919 and looked the other way, so did Wilson. Otherwise a second world war in Europe is a low possibility (and probably would have been started by Uncle Joe), and there certainly would have been no Holocaust. World War I is the start of all 20th Century evils.
Cant say I blame them after just going through WWI. The Brits had only lost 1.2M people in the previous 4 years due to the war... For a war they didnt want in the first place...
If Germany didnt think the treaty was fair, then they shouldnt have picked the fight in the first place.
Straight out of British propaganda. Germany did the same thing Britain did, honor their treaties.
The Triple Alliance was a defensive pact, and not a offensive pact.
Germany allowed Austria-Hungry to present an ultimatum to Seriba, that they knew Serbia would never accept in full. This would give Austria-Hungry "reason" to invade Serbia. They knew by invading Serbia that it would lead to a war with Russia, and because of a treaty between Russia and France, it would also pull France into the war as well, which would then pull in Britian.
Austria-Hungry consulted Germany, before they gave the ultimatum to Serbia. They could have told Austria-Hungry not to do it, but they didnt.. They just stood by and watched what happened. I mean, they had developed plans for a take-over of Western Europe anyways. Why not put it to use. See Schlieffen/Moltke plan.
Italy backed out of the Triple alliance once the war started, Germany could of as well.
(06-28-2016 12:19 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:40 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ] (06-27-2016 09:37 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW....If history teaches us anything, Germany only has Britain's best interests at heart.
Not trying to get into history debates, but Britain only has itself to blame for how Things turned out on the continent in the last century.
And once again history will repeat itself.
smartest thing you've said in 14 forevers....
now teach it....so they'll understand posit and shun factoring......
uh oh.....did you already whiff how money and engineering drives the equation? (and you thought I was just being coy)
disclaimer: yeah, it's post 4:20
