Baylor is gonna deny them stating they are a private institution and go suck it.
(06-22-2016 12:58 PM)BattleCougarRed_88 Wrote: [ -> ]Baylor is gonna deny them stating they are a private institution and go suck it.
Then vote out of the Big 12.
Ahahahaha. I want to laugh at the last paragraph about the Big 12 is concerned with student safety at all their institution member schools, but turned a blind eye to Oklahoma wanted a Missouri player to start for their team after he was booted from Missouri for pushing a female down a flight of stairs. Big 12 better need to come up with rules that any player that have been booted from another school for violent acts should not be allowed to play for them. This could be avoided at Baylor and other schools.
(06-22-2016 12:58 PM)BattleCougarRed_88 Wrote: [ -> ]Baylor is gonna deny them stating they are a private institution and go suck it.
They can do that to FOIA requests and get away with it. I'm not sure they should tell their own conference directors that. Probably best just to comply.
I just don't see the Big Twelve summarily dismissing Baylor from the conference. Once they do that, the gloves are off-- lawsuits will be filed and Baylor will start airing everyone else's dirty laundry. The other 9 schools do not want that.
In the end Baylor will comply to some extent, but not to the degree that will satisfy the masses.
In all likelihood the conference wants this to negotiate sanctions that are tough but still less than what the NCAA would give. IE, they NEED Baylor to be at least decent this year but after this year they wouldn't feel too bad if one of two little private school obstacles to UT being good again were removed.
Most notably, I suspect they will pressure Baylor to release their 2016 recruits while temporarily suspending the intra-conference transfer rules.
(06-22-2016 01:35 PM)10thMountain Wrote: [ -> ]Most notably, I suspect they will pressure Baylor to release their 2016 recruits while temporarily suspending the intra-conference transfer rules.
I know that conferences have rules that require a 2-year wait for intra-conference transfers.
But schools also can control where a kid gets released to. They can prohibit the kid from transferring to certain schools in the actual release papers.
So I am not sure what good it does to change the 2-year intra-conference wait to 1-year or 0-years if Baylor can still prohibit destinations.
When the conference is deciding your sanctions, it behooves you not to fight them too hard on their terms of leniency
(06-22-2016 01:07 PM)stxrunner Wrote: [ -> ] (06-22-2016 12:58 PM)BattleCougarRed_88 Wrote: [ -> ]Baylor is gonna deny them stating they are a private institution and go suck it.
They can do that to FOIA requests and get away with it. I'm not sure they should tell their own conference directors that. Probably best just to comply.
Sure they can. Case is a legal matter. Send us a subpeona or pound sand.
A lot of people think that Baylor should remove themselves from the Big 12 so not to hold down the rest of the conference with all this legal issues they have. By denying the recruits from being released shows how they still think win at no cost attitude at the school. It is more I think the board might be involved in the cover up of the rapes. Starr, the AD and Briles were the only ones been thrown under the train, while the board is trying to save their own skin.
This is getting uglier by the second.
(06-22-2016 01:02 PM)DavidSt Wrote: [ -> ]Ahahahaha. I want to laugh at the last paragraph about the Big 12 is concerned with student safety at all their institution member schools, but turned a blind eye to Oklahoma wanted a Missouri player to start for their team after he was booted from Missouri for pushing a female down a flight of stairs. Big 12 better need to come up with rules that any player that have been booted from another school for violent acts should not be allowed to play for them. This could be avoided at Baylor and other schools.
Not to mention Oklahoma has Joe Mixon playing for their team...
Baylor's not going anywhere. They'll fix things, but will take a hit in recruiting for a couple of years.
(06-22-2016 02:12 PM)DavidSt Wrote: [ -> ]A lot of people think that Baylor should remove themselves from the Big 12 so not to hold down the rest of the conference with all this legal issues they have. 
By denying the recruits from being released shows how they still think win at no cost attitude at the school. It is more I think the board might be involved in the cover up of the rapes. 
Starr, the AD and Briles were the only ones been thrown under the train, while the board is trying to save their own skin.
Where do you get this stuff???
(06-22-2016 03:20 PM)PlayBall! Wrote: [ -> ]Baylor's not going anywhere. They'll fix things, but will take a hit in recruiting for a couple of years.
But things seem out of control... The Big 12 BOD has to be looking for a way out of this embarrassment. Houston could easily take their spot. Then add Cincinnati and Memphis and get to 12.
(06-22-2016 01:07 PM)stxrunner Wrote: [ -> ] (06-22-2016 12:58 PM)BattleCougarRed_88 Wrote: [ -> ]Baylor is gonna deny them stating they are a private institution and go suck it.
They can do that to FOIA requests and get away with it. I'm not sure they should tell their own conference directors that. Probably best just to comply.
They will bring their lawyer to a meeting and say they can't because of potential litigation.
(06-22-2016 07:34 PM)ARSTATEFAN1986 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-22-2016 02:12 PM)DavidSt Wrote: [ -> ]A lot of people think that Baylor should remove themselves from the Big 12 so not to hold down the rest of the conference with all this legal issues they have. By denying the recruits from being released shows how they still think win at no cost attitude at the school. It is more I think the board might be involved in the cover up of the rapes. Starr, the AD and Briles were the only ones been thrown under the train, while the board is trying to save their own skin.
Where do you get this stuff???
Not sure you really want to know the answer to that question... I suspect it has something to do with secret CIA radio broadcasts that he picks up in his filings and aliens that can only be seen if you're wearing special sunglasses.
Whatever the answer is, the inside of David's head has got to be spooky.
(06-22-2016 08:31 PM)bullet Wrote: [ -> ] (06-22-2016 01:07 PM)stxrunner Wrote: [ -> ] (06-22-2016 12:58 PM)BattleCougarRed_88 Wrote: [ -> ]Baylor is gonna deny them stating they are a private institution and go suck it.
They can do that to FOIA requests and get away with it. I'm not sure they should tell their own conference directors that. Probably best just to comply.
They will bring their lawyer to a meeting and say they can't because of potential litigation.
You think the conference can;t do anything to a member?
(06-22-2016 07:34 PM)ARSTATEFAN1986 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-22-2016 02:12 PM)DavidSt Wrote: [ -> ]A lot of people think that Baylor should remove themselves from the Big 12 so not to hold down the rest of the conference with all this legal issues they have. By denying the recruits from being released shows how they still think win at no cost attitude at the school. It is more I think the board might be involved in the cover up of the rapes. Starr, the AD and Briles were the only ones been thrown under the train, while the board is trying to save their own skin.
Where do you get this stuff???
They are refusing to release the findings to anybody, but have to take their word for it. The findings could have listed that the BoTs are involved in the cover up themselves. Why do you think Baylor all of a sudden settled the lawsuit with Briles? Briles may have known that the findings implicating Baylor's BoTs being involved.
![[Image: Clkhez1UsAATAKy.jpg:large]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Clkhez1UsAATAKy.jpg:large)