05-15-2016, 05:09 PM
Pages: 1 2
05-15-2016, 06:26 PM
And now....W 100m hurdles. TXST gal leading, next to last hurdle the runner next to her knocks into her and she falls over hurdle. I don't know what they did about it because sound is not working on the feed.
05-15-2016, 09:11 PM
TXST women could have nabbed 2nd, even 1st, but left 20 points on the track (previous posts).
Final results
1) South Alabama 132
2) Arkansas State 129
3) Texas State 120
Still waiting on men's numbers after the men's 4x400
Final results
1) South Alabama 132
2) Arkansas State 129
3) Texas State 120
Still waiting on men's numbers after the men's 4x400
05-15-2016, 09:16 PM
Ok, men's final
1) Arkansas State 149.50
2) South Alabama 138
3) Texas State 118
Not bad for our guys coming from 7th to 3rd. 99 points on day 3
1) Arkansas State 149.50
2) South Alabama 138
3) Texas State 118
Not bad for our guys coming from 7th to 3rd. 99 points on day 3
05-16-2016, 01:21 AM
USA and AState dominated on the track.
05-16-2016, 11:26 AM
(05-16-2016 01:21 AM)chiefsfan Wrote: [ -> ]USA and AState dominated on the track.Really? Have you checked the results page?
TXST
400m 1,3,6
800m 1,2
400H 5,6
200 2,3,7
4x100 1
4x400 1
Considering we suck at distances, we had no 110H qualifier and our 100m guy had a leg injury, I don't think TXST men had too shabby of a day on the track.
05-16-2016, 06:18 PM
Our normally reliable sprint and long distance teams had a bad weekend. Tough time for that to happen.
05-16-2016, 07:24 PM
(05-16-2016 11:26 AM)CatMom Wrote: [ -> ](05-16-2016 01:21 AM)chiefsfan Wrote: [ -> ]USA and AState dominated on the track.Really? Have you checked the results page?
TXST
400m 1,3,6
800m 1,2
400H 5,6
200 2,3,7
4x100 1
4x400 1
Considering we suck at distances, we had no 110H qualifier and our 100m guy had a leg injury, I don't think TXST men had too shabby of a day on the track.
I was talking about the whole thing, not just the track events, let me be clear.
It's well known that Texas State controls most of the short track races, but AState and USA were stronger team wise.
05-16-2016, 07:34 PM
(05-16-2016 07:24 PM)chiefsfan Wrote: [ -> ]I can agree there. Our men did make a 4 place move but it was all track events involved in that point gathering. Our field events were awful this year. We have some young (field) guys that competed. It was good for them. Hopefully they get better as they get older.(05-16-2016 11:26 AM)CatMom Wrote: [ -> ](05-16-2016 01:21 AM)chiefsfan Wrote: [ -> ]USA and AState dominated on the track.Really? Have you checked the results page?
TXST
400m 1,3,6
800m 1,2
400H 5,6
200 2,3,7
4x100 1
4x400 1
Considering we suck at distances, we had no 110H qualifier and our 100m guy had a leg injury, I don't think TXST men had too shabby of a day on the track.
I was talking about the whole thing, not just the track events, let me be clear.
It's well known that Texas State controls most of the short track races, but AState and USA were stronger team wise.
I believe our breakdown was
Track 96 pts
Field 22 pts
I think we won the indoor because they had the distance medley relay and we took 2 places in the 100m. Did they do the 4x200 indoor?
05-28-2016, 04:10 PM
TXST will be sending W High Jump, W Triple and M 4x400 to Eugene, OR, for Nationals.
Pages: 1 2