CSNbbs

Full Version: feminist glaciology
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/03/05/cl...e-context/

Quote:So, the gist of this paper can be summed up in this statement:

Quote:Most existing glaciological research – and hence discourse and discussions about cryospheric change – stems from information produced by men, about men, with manly characteristics, and within masculinist discourses. These characteristics apply to scientific disciplines beyond glaciology; there is an explicit need to uncover the role of women in the history of science and technology, while also exposing processes for excluding women from science and technology.

Those darn manly men with their masculinist discourses! But, I digress.
Damn.
This woman probably can add something to the discussion as she likely knows a lot about being frigid.
she could make my pole melt by 2012.....
This feels a bit like a singer who wants to show how meaningless their ex is (men's reporting on glaciology) by writing an entire album about that person (men reporting on glaciology.)
Wonder if the author is the same person who wrote the "Carbon Fiber Masculinity" paper. 03-lmfao
They laughed at Galileo too.
I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.
You have to admit, using your abstract to attack that oppressive shitlord patriarchy that is glaciological research is pretty funny.
Can't believe the filter let me say shitlord.
(03-07-2016 07:04 PM)gsu95 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.

Looks like it was a hoax paper, similar to the Sokal paper, made in order to test scientific journals to see if they'll allow in nonsense.
(03-07-2016 07:04 PM)gsu95 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.

Oh yea the side of our political spectrum that get their panties in a twist over stupid things is the right..

To be clear I'm not "pissed off" about this. I find it funny and informative as to just how social justice warriors poison everything, including science.
(03-07-2016 08:12 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 07:04 PM)gsu95 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.

Oh yea the side of our political spectrum that get their panties in a twist over stupid things is the right..

To be clear I'm not "pissed off" about this. I find it funny and informative as to just how social justice warriors poison everything, including science.

Pointing the finger elsewhere doesn't mean it doesn't exist on your side of the spectrum. This messageboard is proof of that.

Some people like to be outraged/offended, and they exist on both the right (WAR ON CHRISTMAS!) and left (SAFE SPACES!).
(03-07-2016 08:20 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 08:12 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 07:04 PM)gsu95 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.

Oh yea the side of our political spectrum that get their panties in a twist over stupid things is the right..

To be clear I'm not "pissed off" about this. I find it funny and informative as to just how social justice warriors poison everything, including science.

Pointing the finger elsewhere doesn't mean it doesn't exist on your side of the spectrum. This messageboard is proof of that.

Funny because when it starts

"I don't even know where you guys find this stuff."

and continues

"Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about."

That sounds alot like you and GSU pointing fingers...

The site it was found on is one of the top 30K websites on the planet and in terms of climate science discussion one of the top 100 or so.

Quote:Some people like to be outraged/offended, and they exist on both the right (WAR ON CHRISTMAS!) and left (SAFE SPACES!).

I was neither outraged or offended. I posted it because things like then are informative of how social justice warriors destroy anything the touch.
(03-06-2016 07:41 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote: [ -> ]This woman probably can add something to the discussion as she likely knows a lot about being frigid.

That is an almost certainty.
(03-06-2016 01:48 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/03/05/cl...e-context/

Quote:So, the gist of this paper can be summed up in this statement:

Quote:Most existing glaciological research – and hence discourse and discussions about cryospheric change – stems from information produced by men, about men, with manly characteristics, and within masculinist discourses. These characteristics apply to scientific disciplines beyond glaciology; there is an explicit need to uncover the role of women in the history of science and technology, while also exposing processes for excluding women from science and technology.

Those darn manly men with their masculinist discourses! But, I digress.

Really. Lmao
(03-07-2016 07:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 07:04 PM)gsu95 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.

Looks like it was a hoax paper, similar to the Sokal paper, made in order to test scientific journals to see if they'll allow in nonsense.

they want it to be real so they can be angry about something...
(03-07-2016 08:42 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 08:20 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 08:12 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 07:04 PM)gsu95 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.

Oh yea the side of our political spectrum that get their panties in a twist over stupid things is the right..

To be clear I'm not "pissed off" about this. I find it funny and informative as to just how social justice warriors poison everything, including science.

Pointing the finger elsewhere doesn't mean it doesn't exist on your side of the spectrum. This messageboard is proof of that.

Funny because when it starts

"I don't even know where you guys find this stuff."

and continues

"Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about."

That sounds alot like you and GSU pointing fingers...

The site it was found on is one of the top 30K websites on the planet and in terms of climate science discussion one of the top 100 or so.

Quote:Some people like to be outraged/offended, and they exist on both the right (WAR ON CHRISTMAS!) and left (SAFE SPACES!).

I was neither outraged or offended. I posted it because things like then are informative of how social justice warriors destroy anything the touch.

it's called comedy gold and writing.....

if you've watched season 4, you'll get that....
(03-08-2016 08:38 AM)UofMemphis Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 07:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 07:04 PM)gsu95 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-07-2016 05:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't even know where you guys find this stuff.

Me neither.
I think they roam the internet in packs, looking for **** to get pissed off about.

Looks like it was a hoax paper, similar to the Sokal paper, made in order to test scientific journals to see if they'll allow in nonsense.

they want it to be real so they can be angry about something...

Again... not angry bro, never was.

I'm glad this instance was a fraud but if you don't think social justice warriors are harming actual useful science you are mistaken.


Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's