Not even close. It was after the second half that Ga St did all their scoring.
Guess they had film
(12-06-2015 12:44 AM)rtletterman Wrote: [ -> ]Not even close. It was after the second half that Ga St did all their scoring.
Guess they had film
Yeah and it led to a solid game plan!
Our dismal performance at Ga Southern might be our blackest eye of the season.
But if we go down this "transitive relation" rabbit hole, we could anoint WMU huge favorites over #2 Alabama (WMU > Toledo > Arkansas > Ole Miss > Bama).
(12-08-2015 02:07 PM)Motown Bronco Wrote: [ -> ]Our dismal performance at Ga Southern might be our blackest eye of the season.
But if we go down this "transitive relation" rabbit hole, we could anoint WMU huge favorites over #2 Alabama (WMU > Toledo > Arkansas > Ole Miss > Bama).
Nothing transitive about it, we got crushed by Georgia Southern.
Georgia State, a then 5-6 team, did not. No spin, fact.
(12-08-2015 02:07 PM)Motown Bronco Wrote: [ -> ]Our dismal performance at Ga Southern might be our blackest eye of the season.
But if we go down this "transitive relation" rabbit hole, we could anoint WMU huge favorites over #2 Alabama (WMU > Toledo > Arkansas > Ole Miss > Bama).
Some teams you match-up well against, others you do not.
And sometimes, you just have a crap day.
WMU had a crap day at Ga Southern, a team it did not match-up well against in the first place, compounding the problem.
(12-08-2015 04:04 PM)GullLake Wrote: [ -> ] (12-08-2015 02:07 PM)Motown Bronco Wrote: [ -> ]Our dismal performance at Ga Southern might be our blackest eye of the season.
But if we go down this "transitive relation" rabbit hole, we could anoint WMU huge favorites over #2 Alabama (WMU > Toledo > Arkansas > Ole Miss > Bama).
Some teams you match-up well against, others you do not.
And sometimes, you just have a crap day.
WMU had a crap day at Ga Southern, a team it did not match-up well against in the first place, compounding the problem.
More excuses. Same old Broncos.
(12-08-2015 04:04 PM)GullLake Wrote: [ -> ] (12-08-2015 02:07 PM)Motown Bronco Wrote: [ -> ]Our dismal performance at Ga Southern might be our blackest eye of the season.
But if we go down this "transitive relation" rabbit hole, we could anoint WMU huge favorites over #2 Alabama (WMU > Toledo > Arkansas > Ole Miss > Bama).
Some teams you match-up well against, others you do not.
And sometimes, you just have a crap day.
WMU had a crap day at Ga Southern, a team it did not match-up well against in the first place, compounding the problem.
You want to talk rabbit holes? Don't get caught in one with those who would rather discredit a decent year by an "eh" team than enjoy the spoils of a bowl opportunity. The Ga. Southern game was a really bad matchup early in a year. (No excuses... We got spanked by a team that could run the crap out of the ball but presented little tape at that point).
This year we have a team that really presented issues both on the OL and DL early. Our Defensive backfield was breaking in a future lock down corner by putting him on an island with nothing to keep him afloat but his previous WR skills. LB Corp lost the #1 during the MSU game... DL... Undersized all year after losing Ash to graduation. I'm amazed we pulled it together enough to win 7 games in the reg season...
It's ok to be happy with a Bowl berth... That Ga Southern game was damn near a season ago. ... Oh wait... Some here just don't want success if it means PJ gets any light. Traitors.
(12-08-2015 06:30 PM)flushtheherd Wrote: [ -> ] (12-08-2015 04:04 PM)GullLake Wrote: [ -> ] (12-08-2015 02:07 PM)Motown Bronco Wrote: [ -> ]Our dismal performance at Ga Southern might be our blackest eye of the season.
But if we go down this "transitive relation" rabbit hole, we could anoint WMU huge favorites over #2 Alabama (WMU > Toledo > Arkansas > Ole Miss > Bama).
Some teams you match-up well against, others you do not.
And sometimes, you just have a crap day.
WMU had a crap day at Ga Southern, a team it did not match-up well against in the first place, compounding the problem.
You want to talk rabbit holes? Don't get caught in one with those who would rather discredit a decent year by an "eh" team than enjoy the spoils of a bowl opportunity. The Ga. Southern game was a really bad matchup early in a year. (No excuses... We got spanked by a team that could run the crap out of the ball but presented little tape at that point).
This year we have a team that really presented issues both on the OL and DL early. Our Defensive backfield was breaking in a future lock down corner by putting him on an island with nothing to keep him afloat but his previous WR skills. LB Corp lost the #1 during the MSU game... DL... Undersized all year after losing Ash to graduation. I'm amazed we pulled it together enough to win 7 games in the reg season...
It's ok to be happy with a Bowl berth... That Ga Southern game was damn near a season ago. ... Oh wait... Some here just don't want success if it means PJ gets any light. Traitors.
love your drunken rants flush!
(12-08-2015 02:12 PM)rtletterman Wrote: [ -> ] (12-08-2015 02:07 PM)Motown Bronco Wrote: [ -> ]Our dismal performance at Ga Southern might be our blackest eye of the season.
But if we go down this "transitive relation" rabbit hole, we could anoint WMU huge favorites over #2 Alabama (WMU > Toledo > Arkansas > Ole Miss > Bama).
Nothing transitive about it, we got crushed by Georgia Southern.
Georgia State, a then 5-6 team, did not. No spin, fact.
They also took georgia to overtime.
We also beat Toledo, who beat Arkansas and was ranked.
You can play this transitive game all you want and come up with whatever narrative you want. The fact that you want to focus on the GSU game to tear our own team down says it all about you.
It's all a transitive game, even if you just take 1 step. We beat Toledo, and Toledo beat Arkansas -- we're better than Arkansas? Or how about BGSU? That's a conflict since we beat Toledo, they beat them but they beat us!
MSU lost to Nebraska. Illinois beat Nebraska. Illinois > MSU.