CSNbbs

Reporting from the game. All black uniforms with mirror helmets. Look awesome!

Trying to post pic

Another bit of advise..... It's cold in shorts.

Nice combination.

RTB

(10-10-2015 10:46 AM)ChuckNorris Wrote: [ -> ]Nice combination.

RTB

Here is to a good game

(10-10-2015 10:57 AM)cmufanatic Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-10-2015 10:46 AM)ChuckNorris Wrote: [ -> ]Nice combination.

RTB

Here is to a good game

Absolutely!

The uni's looked great on TV. Heck, the TEAM looked great on TV. :-D

Just listening to the replay highlights on the Bronco Radio Network. I'll bet that both Robin Hook and John Creek needed to change their pants for hygienic reasons several times during that game. *snicker*

Wish I were 50 years younger. I'd be partying up a storm in Kzoo tonight. In spite of the close final score, we were clearly the better team this afternoon. And Braverman was ... yes, I'll say it ... ELITE today!!

I don't mean to sound like a poor winner, but DAY-UM, it's such a pleasure to lay one on the Chimps!

(10-10-2015 03:10 PM)Whinny1 Wrote: [ -> ]The uni's looked great on TV. Heck, the TEAM looked great on TV. :-D

Just listening to the replay highlights on the Bronco Radio Network. I'll bet that both Robin Hook and John Creek needed to change their pants for hygienic reasons several times during that game. *snicker*

Wish I were 50 years younger. I'd be partying up a storm in Kzoo tonight. In spite of the close final score, we were clearly the better team this afternoon. And Braverman was ... yes, I'll say it ... ELITE today!!

I don't mean to sound like a poor winner, but DAY-UM, it's such a pleasure to lay one on the Chimps!

Chips are saying on their board that we are average and they played down to our level... lol. Either way, I'll be enjoying yet another win over CMU, they can enjoy their imaginary superiority.

LOL. Chips played "down to our level"? In a rivalry game? HORRIBLE argument. Horrible.

If the Chips didn't have any turnovers, yes, they'd have an argument that they'd "win the game". But playing on the opposing team's field, the opposing team has talent -- if you lose the turnover battle, that basically will make the difference, case closed. No sense in coming up with crazy sh!t like that.

Played "down to our level"??? Heck, if they'd been anywhere near our level, they might have had a chance to win the game. We had the talent, we had the speed, we had the fans, we had the home field, and yes, today we had the coaching. Face it ... the final score was closer than the game.

Has anyone seen the final stats/box score? I'm curious.

Here I go - Thanks, Whinny.

(Looks like the third down conversion % and penalties were crucial.)

http://www.wmubroncos.com/liveStats/v2/f...em_id=4600

Fleck lost a few points in my book the way we called plays at the end on the game. He played not to lose instead of playing to win. When we had on first down inside the 15, you go for the score there. We were lucky to have it end the way it did.

On the other hand, I loved the fact that we went for it on fourth down there. Without question that was the correct call.

Going for it on 4th and 3 to seal the victory.........

A+ for the Admiral. He knows how to beat CMU.

I think that was more him not trusting the kicker or our defense.

(10-10-2015 04:19 PM)brovol Wrote: [ -> ]Fleck lost a few points in my book the way we called plays at the end on the game. He played not to lose instead of playing to win. When we had on first down inside the 15, you go for the score there. We were lucky to have it end the way it did.

On the other hand, I loved the fact that we went for it on fourth down there. Without question that was the correct call.

Since the WKU Central has made a habit of getting behind big. Teens relax and try to manage the lead with the ground game and CMU gets back in the games. At some point teams Aren't going to let off the gas. At some point teams are going to sit in the nickel defense the entire game and dare them to pass.

(10-10-2015 04:22 PM)rtletterman Wrote: [ -> ]I think that was more him not trusting the kicker or our defense.

Well then, quiet down in the peanut gallery.

Giving up 39 points with two weeks to prepare and Grant DePalma back is appalling.

WMU 41-39

It took Bill seven years to get a second win vs our rival. My god

(10-10-2015 05:44 PM)ChuckNorris Wrote: [ -> ]WMU 41-39

It took Bill seven years to get a second win vs our rival. My god

Context. A significant difference in talent in the Kelly and Jones days compared to the last coach.

Nope. The Deadspin-three were talking up coach Bono like he had CMU in the driver seat.

They had the talent to beat league champ NIU. They do not have the talent to beat us or the Admiral.