So it's OK for guys like uclaboozehound and CD/CD1/CD2, aka [REDACTED], to trash David Drew by name in this forum, but it's NOT OK for us to cite people named in public documents like court filings?
If someone from the board could please cite the logic in that without coming across as a total hypocrite, I'd not only appreciate it, but I'd also be very impressed.
Sometimes as part of an agreement, people sign a non-disclosure arrangement, i.e., we are settling up and letting sleeping dogs lie.
Always found this a good policy in interpersonal relations, if there is a conflict and it is resolved, don't bring it up again. Serves little purpose.
Especially true with your wife or girlfriend!
Thought there was some policy out there about not saying the actual names of posters?
(10-02-2015 11:16 AM)Nacho Wrote: [ -> ]Thought there was some policy out there about not saying the actual names of posters?
Not specifically, just AUP that "personal attacks on other posters..." may be deleted.
(10-02-2015 10:53 AM)Charm City Bronco Wrote: [ -> ]So it's OK for guys like uclaboozehound and CD/CD1/CD2, aka Dan Burgardt, to trash David Drew by name in this forum, but it's NOT OK for us to cite people named in public documents like court filings?
If someone from the board could please cite the logic in that without coming across as a total hypocrite, I'd not only appreciate it, but I'd also be very impressed.
I guess I would ask you what's the point? What worthwhile outcome is there to naming names? If its just to appease your sense of vindication or self-righteousness why bother?
David Drew's user handle on this forum is...David Drew. He is also a public figure, a writer for Mlive. Criticism comes with the job.
For everyone else, it's not okay to use actual names in this forum without consent. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Thread closed.