CSNbbs

No Ga State?

BS poll, how can it be respected if they don't have GaSt in it???

He tweeted me back and said "past Season results don't matter" based on his poll criteria

(09-09-2015 04:03 PM)Usajags Wrote: [ -> ]BS poll, how can it be respected if they don't have GaSt in it???

I think this poll uses an actual formula where losing by a large # of points or losing to an FCS team hurts you much more. So GA State losing to Charlotte by a few points doesn't show up yet.

Approved

(09-09-2015 04:42 PM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote: [ -> ]He tweeted me back and said "past Season results don't matter" based on his poll criteria

If past season results don't matter he sure talks about last season in several posts including Troy.

And if he had watched any of the Troy game he would know we were only down by 14 late in the 3rd quarter. As he stated ark State didn't lose as bad as it looks.

Waste of time reading. Nothing to see here.

This is stupid. The old ESPN Bottom 10 at least took the games themselves into consideration. He even says the stAte game "wasn't as bad as it looks" but adds "I'm not saying that means Arkansas State will get out of these rankings any time soon". Yeah, because a team that's gone to a bowl game every year for the past four years and was playing the #8 team AT HOME is clearly a team that's going to get crushed all season long. Oh, but Georgia Southern "is still too good to be ranked here for long, though." The hallmark of a writer putting absolutely zero effort into what he's writing.

I more respectable poll

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-bottom-10

(09-09-2015 05:03 PM)Usajags Wrote: [ -> ]I more respectable poll

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-bottom-10

Based on...

(09-09-2015 05:03 PM)Usajags Wrote: [ -> ]I more respectable poll

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-bottom-10

Agreed, but not sure Texas state deserves to be on here.

(09-09-2015 05:07 PM)Atlanta Trojan Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-09-2015 05:03 PM)Usajags Wrote: [ -> ]I more respectable poll

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-bottom-10

Agreed, but not sure Texas state deserves to be on here.

Lol I think putting us there was just so they could take another shot at UT

(09-09-2015 05:03 PM)Usajags Wrote: [ -> ]I more respectable poll

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-bottom-10

Agreed.

I've always enjoyed his comedic approach to bad teams.

Boy, that's a pile of Belt teams in those two rankings.

(09-09-2015 07:32 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote: [ -> ]Boy, that's a pile of Belt teams in those two rankings.

Almost too much to take for Week 1. The Jags got a W, but Wardner-Gebb gave all we wanted and then some.

(09-09-2015 05:51 PM)TheEagleWay Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-09-2015 05:03 PM)Usajags Wrote: [ -> ]I more respectable poll

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-bottom-10

Agreed.

I've always enjoyed his comedic approach to bad teams.

His statement on Texas State is ABSOLUTELY true... sadly.

He used the wrong logo for three Sun Belt schools ...

(09-09-2015 05:04 PM)panama Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-09-2015 05:03 PM)Usajags Wrote: [ -> ]I more respectable poll

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...-bottom-10

Based on...

It is based on no metrics whatsoever, therefore it is better.