Results are in:
Every way you slice it (most 4-stars, most 3-stars, average star rating), the MAC out-recruited the MWC, AAC, Sun Belt and C-USA. Minus Florida State and Clemson, the MAC kept right behind the rest of the ACC.
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9...=2&yr=2015
MAC - 2 four-star, 115 three-star, 2.38 average
AAC - 0 four-star, 90 three-star, 2.31 average
MWC - 2 four-star, 72 three-star
CUSA - 0 four-star, 68 three-star
SBC - 0 four-star, 37 three-star
#MACTION
.
Miami (OH) you are so predictable.
First of all Scout is probably the worst site to use second American and MWC teams got several four star recruits.
Based on 247 Compostite Rankings (Use of Scout, Rivals, ESPN, 247 All averaged together)
Conference 4* 3*
American 2 122 (11 Schools)
C-USA 0 113 (13 Schools)
MAC 0 101 (13 Schools)
MWC 3 107 (12 Schools)
Sun Belt 0 77 (11 Schools)
By looking at that I would say:
1 American
2 Mountain West (More 4 stars but not nearly as many 3 stars)
3 Conference USA
4 MAC (Not Quite First)
5 Sun Belt
Past: AAC ranked #3 of 5 in 2014-2015 final official rankings behind MWC and CUSA
Future: AAC ranked #2 of 5 behind MAC in 2015 recruiting
AAC falling to middle of G5 pack despite having an initial advantage from Big East.
Don't let the Sun Belt pass you too - ouch.
(02-04-2015 04:25 PM)Carolina_Low_Country Wrote: [ -> ]First of all Scout is probably the worst site to use second American and MWC teams got several four star recruits.
Based on 247 Compostite Rankings (Use of Scout, Rivals, ESPN, 247 All averaged together)
Conference 4* 3*
American 2 122 (11 Schools)
C-USA 0 113 (13 Schools)
MAC 0 101 (13 Schools)
MWC 3 107 (12 Schools)
Sun Belt 0 77 (11 Schools)
Not sure about others but the MW has quite a few schools that had a small recruiting class. So some of the MW #'s are skewed.
(02-04-2015 04:36 PM)MWC Tex Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2015 04:25 PM)Carolina_Low_Country Wrote: [ -> ]First of all Scout is probably the worst site to use second American and MWC teams got several four star recruits.
Based on 247 Compostite Rankings (Use of Scout, Rivals, ESPN, 247 All averaged together)
Conference 4* 3*
American 2 122 (11 Schools)
C-USA 0 113 (13 Schools)
MAC 0 101 (13 Schools)
MWC 3 107 (12 Schools)
Sun Belt 0 77 (11 Schools)
Not sure about others but the MW has quite a few schools that had a small recruiting class. So some of the MW #'s are skewed.
Same for the American ECU only took 12 players.
(02-04-2015 04:08 PM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote: [ -> ]Results are in:
Every way you slice it (most 4-stars, most 3-stars, average star rating), the MAC out-recruited the MWC, AAC, Sun Belt and C-USA. Minus Florida State and Clemson, the MAC kept right behind the rest of the ACC.
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9...=2&yr=2015
MAC - 2 four-star, 115 three-star, 2.38 average
AAC - 0 four-star, 90 three-star, 2.31 average
MWC - 2 four-star, 72 three-star
CUSA - 0 four-star, 68 three-star
SBC - 0 four-star, 37 three-star
#MACTION
Only time will tell. The AAC did not separate itself from the other conferences like I would have liked. The P5 advantage is starting to hurt even more. Only Boise upstaged the party this year. Marshall had a nice run, made some noise but didn't wreck the status quo.
(02-04-2015 04:43 PM)bearcat29 Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2015 04:08 PM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote: [ -> ]Results are in:
Every way you slice it (most 4-stars, most 3-stars, average star rating), the MAC out-recruited the MWC, AAC, Sun Belt and C-USA. Minus Florida State and Clemson, the MAC kept right behind the rest of the ACC.
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9...=2&yr=2015
MAC - 2 four-star, 115 three-star, 2.38 average
AAC - 0 four-star, 90 three-star, 2.31 average
MWC - 2 four-star, 72 three-star
CUSA - 0 four-star, 68 three-star
SBC - 0 four-star, 37 three-star
#MACTION
Only time will tell. The AAC did not separate itself from the other conferences like I would have liked. The P5 advantage is starting to hurt even more. Only Boise upstaged the party this year. Marshall had a nice run, made some noise but didn't wreck the status quo.
I see W. Michigan had another good recruiting class. However, that hasn't translated to field.
Some 3* are better than others I guess.
Looks like some reality settling in for the AAC teams, but still decent.
This is some nice spin right here. MAC doesn't look so hot in almost any other metric service.
(02-04-2015 04:25 PM)Carolina_Low_Country Wrote: [ -> ]First of all Scout is probably the worst site to use second American and MWC teams got several four star recruits.
Based on 247 Compostite Rankings (Use of Scout, Rivals, ESPN, 247 All averaged together)
Conference 4* 3*
American 2 122 (11 Schools)
C-USA 0 113 (13 Schools)
MAC 0 101 (13 Schools)
MWC 3 107 (12 Schools)
Sun Belt 0 77 (11 Schools)
By looking at that I would say:
1 American
2 Mountain West (More 4 stars but not nearly as many 3 stars)
3 Conference USA
4 MAC (Not Quite First)
5 Sun Belt
That is about how I would have expected it would go. Supports the theory of the American being the conference that is turned into the cream of the Cinderella crop.
(02-04-2015 04:31 PM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote: [ -> ]Past: AAC ranked #3 of 5 in 2014-2015 final official rankings behind MWC and CUSA
Future: AAC ranked #2 of 5 behind MAC in 2015 recruiting
AAC falling to middle of G5 pack despite having an initial advantage from Big East.
Don't let the Sun Belt pass you too - ouch.
lol....How quickly they forget. The MAC is 1-8 in bowl games over the last 2 years. The MAC isn't out recruiting anyone including the Sunbelt.
(02-04-2015 04:31 PM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote: [ -> ]Past: AAC ranked #3 of 5 in 2014-2015 final official rankings behind MWC and CUSA
Future: AAC ranked #2 of 5 behind MAC in 2015 recruiting
AAC falling to middle of G5 pack despite having an initial advantage from Big East.
Don't let the Sun Belt pass you too - ouch.
I have a lot of respect for Miami's football history, but there are several Sun Belt teams that would have slapped y'all around this year. There are no trophies for arbitrary recruiting rankings.
(02-04-2015 08:23 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2015 04:31 PM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote: [ -> ]Past: AAC ranked #3 of 5 in 2014-2015 final official rankings behind MWC and CUSA
Future: AAC ranked #2 of 5 behind MAC in 2015 recruiting
AAC falling to middle of G5 pack despite having an initial advantage from Big East.
Don't let the Sun Belt pass you too - ouch.
lol....How quickly they forget. The MAC is 1-8 in bowl games over the last 2 years. The MAC isn't out recruiting anyone including the Sunbelt.
Ummmmm.... The MAC went 2-3 this season in bowl games. So.......... Yeah.
(02-04-2015 08:21 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2015 04:39 PM)Carolina_Low_Country Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2015 04:36 PM)MWC Tex Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2015 04:25 PM)Carolina_Low_Country Wrote: [ -> ]First of all Scout is probably the worst site to use second American and MWC teams got several four star recruits.
Based on 247 Compostite Rankings (Use of Scout, Rivals, ESPN, 247 All averaged together)
Conference 4* 3*
American 2 122 (11 Schools)
C-USA 0 113 (13 Schools)
MAC 0 101 (13 Schools)
MWC 3 107 (12 Schools)
Sun Belt 0 77 (11 Schools)
Not sure about others but the MW has quite a few schools that had a small recruiting class. So some of the MW #'s are skewed.
Same for the American ECU only took 12 players.
Houston only took 17.
Plus 3 or 4 or how many his wife can figure out from the previous regime.
For those that are lost, google the UH signing day presser. Herman isn't a math guy.
(02-04-2015 04:08 PM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote: [ -> ]Results are in:
Every way you slice it (most 4-stars, most 3-stars, average star rating), the MAC out-recruited the MWC, AAC, Sun Belt and C-USA. Minus Florida State and Clemson, the MAC kept right behind the rest of the ACC.
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9...=2&yr=2015
MAC - 2 four-star, 115 three-star, 2.38 average
AAC - 0 four-star, 90 three-star, 2.31 average
MWC - 2 four-star, 72 three-star
CUSA - 0 four-star, 68 three-star
SBC - 0 four-star, 37 three-star
#MACTION
.
Scout has MAC at only 41 but nice try
https://rivals.yahoo.com/arkansasstate/f.../MIDAM/all
It's pretty clear that top 3 in MWC and ACC have the best classes..after that all the conference too 3 or 4 are pretty even
![[Image: tumblr_nae31yN6J61rvkjrvo1_500.gif]](https://38.media.tumblr.com/96810dc17f71beeb0cfbe5070dd2f004/tumblr_nae31yN6J61rvkjrvo1_500.gif)