CSNbbs

(12-02-2014 09:13 PM)stAteNation Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/...am_he.html

Crap, we're screwed...

(12-02-2014 09:17 PM)gostAte870 Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:13 PM)stAteNation Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/...am_he.html

Crap, we're screwed...

No, stAte is likely going to Mobile again for their yearly NIU matchup.

(12-02-2014 09:17 PM)Tiguar Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:17 PM)gostAte870 Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:13 PM)stAteNation Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/...am_he.html

Crap, we're screwed...

No, stAte is likely going to Mobile again for their yearly NIU matchup.

Which means we're screwed . . .

Our domino fell already

(12-02-2014 09:19 PM)Bobcat87 Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:17 PM)Tiguar Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:17 PM)gostAte870 Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:13 PM)stAteNation Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/...am_he.html

Crap, we're screwed...

No, stAte is likely going to Mobile again for their yearly NIU matchup.

Which means we're screwed . . .

Probably. To be honest, I'm really surprised at this. An argument can be made though for us over you guys. But it was a probably "a tie goes to the local team".

Congrats! Yall go kick some ass

Congrats Jags. Good luck and bring home the win!

(12-02-2014 09:17 PM)gostAte870 Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:13 PM)stAteNation Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/...am_he.html

Crap, we're screwed...

No, Texas State is screwed, Unless you call facing a 11-2 NIU screwed...which might be a good example of it.

Not official on our end, but it appears to be the deal.

Go Daddy was under pressure from political people to take USA, but businesses wanted AState back. They worked out a deal with Montgomery to ensure the Jags got a bowl bid, and then will likely send us an invitation to follow.

Some poor puppy is doomed.

(12-02-2014 09:13 PM)stAteNation Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/...am_he.html

Oh well, I was wrong on South Al. But it is clear Go Daddy wasn't interested in keeping the home team in Mobile.

Guess we got to get 8 wins...

Congrats South Alabama! Best of luck to yall

(12-02-2014 09:26 PM)slycat Wrote: [ -> ]Guess we got to get 8 wins...

7-5 next year gets anyone in the Belt to a Bowl game.

(12-02-2014 09:26 PM)slycat Wrote: [ -> ]Guess we got to get 8 wins...

Or move closer to somewhere between Louisiana and Alabama

(12-02-2014 09:27 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:26 PM)slycat Wrote: [ -> ]Guess we got to get 8 wins...

7-5 next year gets anyone in the Belt to a Bowl game.

How do you figure?

(12-02-2014 09:25 PM)CrazyCajun Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:13 PM)stAteNation Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/...am_he.html

Oh well, I was wrong on South Al. But it is clear Go Daddy wasn't interested in keeping the home team in Mobile.

A State travels well.

(12-02-2014 09:27 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:26 PM)slycat Wrote: [ -> ]Guess we got to get 8 wins...

7-5 next year gets anyone in the Belt to a Bowl game.

Maybe. But with App and GS that would be 6 teams for 4 bowls next year. Once again we are no where near any bowl but NOLA, so we may have to win the conference to get a bowl.

(12-02-2014 09:28 PM)ark30inf Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:27 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2014 09:26 PM)slycat Wrote: [ -> ]Guess we got to get 8 wins...

7-5 next year gets anyone in the Belt to a Bowl game.

How do you figure?

78 versus 76 bowl slots. 4 for the Sun Belt. Its also unlikely that 5 Sun Belt teams will win 0 games against the top 6 teams.

So that's my educated guess here. My guess is that the Belt will get 5 slots next year (4 + 1 from someone who can't qualify).

Said it in the other thread, but will say it again.

Congrats South Alabama... what an incredible moment for y'all! Couldn't have happened to a classier group of people.

I don't understand. GaSouthern's not in a bowl? I thought they skull-dragged the Sunbelt?