For EMU, we should execute the same game plan we had against Vick and Ohio. Bell is a run first guy.
7-0 CMU very early.
EMU's D is pretty good if your O is not running on all cylinders. A team can put up points if they are, but EMU has improved over the weeks, locking down their D better.
I think WE will do OK if we have our O going. And we (should) seek revenge on those leprechaun ba$tards -- so our O should be running on all cylinders then.
CMU's going to have to have Davis carry that one. I think it's a toss-up between them both. I would be Surprised if CMU wins big, or if EMU wins by more than 7.
Franklin will rush for 200 yards, 4 TD's against EMU.
CMU up 14-0. Also, CMU has a great D.
And I also notice EMU now has to wear more GREEN jerseys now at home. It makes them more visible and less camo'd.
CMU should win this if they can score 14 pts in the 1Q. Wow.
Why did Creighton change QB's?
(11-01-2014 12:27 PM)toddjnsn Wrote: [ -> ]EMU's D is pretty good if your O is not running on all cylinders. A team can put up points if they are, but EMU has improved over the weeks, locking down their D better.
Todd, keep telling us how good EMU's defense is. A true freshman just took one to the house for his first career TD. Swiss cheese.
Now, you'll tell me how much of a juggernaut CMU's offense (sans Rawls) is, as if that takes EMU's defense off the hook.
Wow. What a crowd for a 'rivalry game.'
What I've taken away from this game.
EMU= terrible
NIU= terrible
KSU= terrible
Buffalo= terrible
Miami= terrible
OU= terrible
The only MAC program that recovered from last year is Ball State. They lost a great QB but recovered.
CMU= improved, but hasn't beaten anyone in the MAC
WMU= improved, but has beaten two good teams
UT= About the same, but this in spite of losing their starting QB and RB
UMass= Improved offense, no defense, but who cares, they're gone anyway
Akron= Vastly improved, and may very well win the East if Pohl gets back
BG= Not as good, but they still have plenty of weapons
CMU up 21-0. I am surprised. I think part of it (I know, sounds weird) -- is that the EMoos are more visible with their very green jerseys -- so their previous home field advantage lessened.
(11-01-2014 12:59 PM)toddjnsn Wrote: [ -> ]CMU up 21-0. I am surprised. I think part of it (I know, sounds weird) -- is that the EMoos are more visible with their very green jerseys -- so their previous home field advantage lessened.
They should change their uniforms at half.
(11-01-2014 12:54 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: [ -> ] (11-01-2014 12:27 PM)toddjnsn Wrote: [ -> ]EMU's D is pretty good if your O is not running on all cylinders. A team can put up points if they are, but EMU has improved over the weeks, locking down their D better.
Todd, keep telling us how good EMU's defense is. A true freshman just took one to the house for his first career TD. Swiss cheese.
Now, you'll tell me how much of a juggernaut CMU's offense (sans Rawls) is, as if that takes EMU's defense off the hook.
Yeah, that EMU D is awesome. You need not bother to throw on them. A quarterback sneak is a guaranteed 4 yard gain. They are awful.
Both teams just 'gifted' the ball to the other team. CMU recovers the EMU fumble.
Man, EMU is awful. If we don't spank them hard it will be quite embarrassing.
Davis for the TD. The rout grows. Play under review.
Michael Reghi gushing over how good the officials are in the MAC. You can't make this **** up but he IS paid by the MAC to promote their brand. Maybe he doesn't realize how funny those statements are to those that actually watch MAC football.
(11-01-2014 01:22 PM)toddjnsn Wrote: [ -> ]EMU needs to go FCS.
Creighton not a genius.
Why would you change QB's. What is to be gained by putting a 5th year QB in who was a WR last year?
The announcers are calling EMU young, but they really aren't.
EMU was better last year with an interim coach than they are right now. They look like they've given up.
