(10-15-2014 10:14 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Please explain to me why and how Southern is the class of the conference who have you beaten in the conference or out of conference that you should not have beaten. Moral victories don't count. If you want to look at strength of schedules only A-state has played a harder schedule. Arguably the two best teams in this conference will play on Tuesday. Until you beat the big boys you are just blowing smoke because we don't know and will not find out this year. Its not your fault you didn't make the schedule but its okay. The winner of Tuesday night game will win the conference. After state we have two very tough games because of rivalries USA and ULM. Just tired of Southern thinking they are world beaters anyone can count OC games but ask ULM they always do well but how many conference championships they won. Oh and you can say we look like crap but we like you are still undefeated in conference.
I must have misread, but I don't see where he said Southern is the class of the conference.
Don't get your panties in a bunch, you might blow a blood vessel.
(10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Dude we are undefeated in conference play with a tougher schedule than you. Southern is fast to accept the fact that they don't have to play two of the top teams in the conference but grip about not being able to go bowling. Name one of the teams we lost to that you could have beaten. If we played you we'd crush you our team is built to stop the run your team can't pass the ball oh and you didn't look good against a week Idaho team. Just be glad you have a two year break. The sad thing is when you are eligible to go bowling you have to play UL and A-State damn the bad luck. You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
(10-15-2014 10:19 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:14 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Please explain to me why and how Southern is the class of the conference who have you beaten in the conference or out of conference that you should not have beaten. Moral victories don't count. If you want to look at strength of schedules only A-state has played a harder schedule. Arguably the two best teams in this conference will play on Tuesday. Until you beat the big boys you are just blowing smoke because we don't know and will not find out this year. Its not your fault you didn't make the schedule but its okay. The winner of Tuesday night game will win the conference. After state we have two very tough games because of rivalries USA and ULM. Just tired of Southern thinking they are world beaters anyone can count OC games but ask ULM they always do well but how many conference championships they won. Oh and you can say we look like crap but we like you are still undefeated in conference.
I must have misread, but I don't see where he said Southern is the class of the conference.
Don't get your panties in a bunch, you might blow a blood vessel.
He'll go away when stAte beats the brakes off them next week.
(10-15-2014 07:20 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ]If you are basing this poll or survey on week to week then this coming week I feel we should be 1 or2 based off of our victory over a pretty good TxSt team on national tv, if you are basing it off of the season then I feel UL and A-State are 1a and 1b until someone other than each other beat us to unseat us a co-champs.
Texas state is not pretty good! With a SOS of 128 With very ugly wins I don't see Texas state as a contender. I also believe ULm and USA motive ahead of them in rankings
1. stAte
2. GaSouth
3.UL
4 ULm
5 USA
6 Texas state
7 Georgia state
8. Troy
9 NMSU
10 App st
11 Idaho
Winner of next Tuesday match will be number 1
(10-15-2014 10:21 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ]You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
Well... yeah... it's an NCAA rule. Was that suppose to be a burn or something?
(10-15-2014 10:21 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Dude we are undefeated in conference play with a tougher schedule than you. Southern is fast to accept the fact that they don't have to play two of the top teams in the conference but grip about not being able to go bowling. Name one of the teams we lost to that you could have beaten. If we played you we'd crush you our team is built to stop the run your team can't pass the ball oh and you didn't look good against a week Idaho team. Just be glad you have a two year break. The sad thing is when you are eligible to go bowling you have to play UL and A-State damn the bad luck. You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
You know, we've heard for the past 30 years that teams are built to stop the run. It doesn't happen often. But it's ok sweetie. Keep thumping your chest, because in 2 years, our team will be a lot better than it is now. Are you talking about this year, or in 2 years, because if you mean in 2 years, you are insane if you think a 10-2 team stays at home and a 6-6 team doesn't.
(10-15-2014 10:25 AM)bullitt_60 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:19 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:14 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Please explain to me why and how Southern is the class of the conference who have you beaten in the conference or out of conference that you should not have beaten. Moral victories don't count. If you want to look at strength of schedules only A-state has played a harder schedule. Arguably the two best teams in this conference will play on Tuesday. Until you beat the big boys you are just blowing smoke because we don't know and will not find out this year. Its not your fault you didn't make the schedule but its okay. The winner of Tuesday night game will win the conference. After state we have two very tough games because of rivalries USA and ULM. Just tired of Southern thinking they are world beaters anyone can count OC games but ask ULM they always do well but how many conference championships they won. Oh and you can say we look like crap but we like you are still undefeated in conference.
I must have misread, but I don't see where he said Southern is the class of the conference.
Don't get your panties in a bunch, you might blow a blood vessel.
He'll go away when stAte beats the brakes off them next week.
all the ulala fans were in hiding, and now they get a decent win and they are all back to being the best team in the conference. lol
(10-15-2014 10:27 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:21 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Dude we are undefeated in conference play with a tougher schedule than you. Southern is fast to accept the fact that they don't have to play two of the top teams in the conference but grip about not being able to go bowling. Name one of the teams we lost to that you could have beaten. If we played you we'd crush you our team is built to stop the run your team can't pass the ball oh and you didn't look good against a week Idaho team. Just be glad you have a two year break. The sad thing is when you are eligible to go bowling you have to play UL and A-State damn the bad luck. You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
You know, we've heard for the past 30 years that teams are built to stop the run. It doesn't happen often. But it's ok sweetie. Keep thumping your chest, because in 2 years, our team will be a lot better than it is now. Are you talking about this year, or in 2 years, because if you mean in 2 years, you are insane if you think a 10-2 team stays at home and a 6-6 team doesn't.
Well I'm sure stAte and ULL have the athletes to slow down southern. The script would be flipped inn a lot of ways and it would be your defense struggling to get off the field quick enough. I agree in2 years you will be better.. So will __________
(10-15-2014 10:37 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:27 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:21 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Dude we are undefeated in conference play with a tougher schedule than you. Southern is fast to accept the fact that they don't have to play two of the top teams in the conference but grip about not being able to go bowling. Name one of the teams we lost to that you could have beaten. If we played you we'd crush you our team is built to stop the run your team can't pass the ball oh and you didn't look good against a week Idaho team. Just be glad you have a two year break. The sad thing is when you are eligible to go bowling you have to play UL and A-State damn the bad luck. You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
You know, we've heard for the past 30 years that teams are built to stop the run. It doesn't happen often. But it's ok sweetie. Keep thumping your chest, because in 2 years, our team will be a lot better than it is now. Are you talking about this year, or in 2 years, because if you mean in 2 years, you are insane if you think a 10-2 team stays at home and a 6-6 team doesn't.
Well I'm sure stAte and ULL have the athletes to slow down southern. The script would be flipped inn a lot of ways and it would be your defense struggling to get off the field quick enough. I agree in2 years you will be better.. So will __________
I don't doubt they have the athletes to slow us down. Doesn't mean they would absolutely win.
It isn't the same type of getting better comparison though. Going by what most people on here said, we don't have good depth right now and we don't have FBS talent. So in 2 years we will have more depth and more talent, whereas you guys will have more of the same. So technically, we should improve by leaps and bounds over the next 2-3 years.
I'm just going by what you guys told us.
(10-15-2014 10:39 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:37 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:27 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:21 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Dude we are undefeated in conference play with a tougher schedule than you. Southern is fast to accept the fact that they don't have to play two of the top teams in the conference but grip about not being able to go bowling. Name one of the teams we lost to that you could have beaten. If we played you we'd crush you our team is built to stop the run your team can't pass the ball oh and you didn't look good against a week Idaho team. Just be glad you have a two year break. The sad thing is when you are eligible to go bowling you have to play UL and A-State damn the bad luck. You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
You know, we've heard for the past 30 years that teams are built to stop the run. It doesn't happen often. But it's ok sweetie. Keep thumping your chest, because in 2 years, our team will be a lot better than it is now. Are you talking about this year, or in 2 years, because if you mean in 2 years, you are insane if you think a 10-2 team stays at home and a 6-6 team doesn't.
Well I'm sure stAte and ULL have the athletes to slow down southern. The script would be flipped inn a lot of ways and it would be your defense struggling to get off the field quick enough. I agree in2 years you will be better.. So will __________
I don't doubt they have the athletes to slow us down. Doesn't mean they would absolutely win.
It isn't the same type of getting better comparison though. Going by what most people on here said, we don't have good depth right now and we don't have FBS talent. So in 2 years we will have more depth and more talent, whereas you guys will have more of the same. So technically, we should improve by leaps and bounds over the next 2-3 years.
I'm just going by what you guys told us.
I'm not questioning your talent level at all. I know you guys are #2/#3 in this Conference IN UOUR FIRST FULL YEAR. That's impressive!
I just don't see you guys being to run the ball effectively enough to beat us. I'm not saying hold you under 100. You would be best running team we have faced but not most talented. We would hold you well under average.
(10-15-2014 10:45 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:39 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:37 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:27 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:21 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ]Dude we are undefeated in conference play with a tougher schedule than you. Southern is fast to accept the fact that they don't have to play two of the top teams in the conference but grip about not being able to go bowling. Name one of the teams we lost to that you could have beaten. If we played you we'd crush you our team is built to stop the run your team can't pass the ball oh and you didn't look good against a week Idaho team. Just be glad you have a two year break. The sad thing is when you are eligible to go bowling you have to play UL and A-State damn the bad luck. You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
You know, we've heard for the past 30 years that teams are built to stop the run. It doesn't happen often. But it's ok sweetie. Keep thumping your chest, because in 2 years, our team will be a lot better than it is now. Are you talking about this year, or in 2 years, because if you mean in 2 years, you are insane if you think a 10-2 team stays at home and a 6-6 team doesn't.
Well I'm sure stAte and ULL have the athletes to slow down southern. The script would be flipped inn a lot of ways and it would be your defense struggling to get off the field quick enough. I agree in2 years you will be better.. So will __________
I don't doubt they have the athletes to slow us down. Doesn't mean they would absolutely win.
It isn't the same type of getting better comparison though. Going by what most people on here said, we don't have good depth right now and we don't have FBS talent. So in 2 years we will have more depth and more talent, whereas you guys will have more of the same. So technically, we should improve by leaps and bounds over the next 2-3 years.
I'm just going by what you guys told us.
I'm not questioning your talent level at all. I know you guys are #2/#3 in this Conference IN UOUR FIRST FULL YEAR. That's impressive!
I just don't see you guys being to run the ball effectively enough to beat us. I'm not saying hold you under 100. You would be best running team we have faced but not most talented. We would hold you well under average.
Well hopefully Fritz is still around when we play you guys
(10-15-2014 10:21 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Dude we are undefeated in conference play with a tougher schedule than you. Southern is fast to accept the fact that they don't have to play two of the top teams in the conference but grip about not being able to go bowling. Name one of the teams we lost to that you could have beaten. If we played you we'd crush you our team is built to stop the run your team can't pass the ball oh and you didn't look good against a week Idaho team. Just be glad you have a two year break. The sad thing is when you are eligible to go bowling you have to play UL and A-State damn the bad luck. You know you could go 10-2 and we go 6-6 and we'd go bowling and you'll be sitting at home.
I feel certain Southern could beat LaTech, most of their wins seem unimpressive, except the pistol-whipping they put on ULaLa. Besides that game, they only beat UTEP and perennial cellar-sweller North Texas. Hell, Boise's resume doesn't even look that impressive with wins over Colorado St, UConn (barf), and Nevada.
You did get one thing right though. I highlighted it above.
Otherwise...
![[Image: ylial_zps530eee3c.gif]](http://i318.photobucket.com/albums/mm436/gsu2583/ylial_zps530eee3c.gif)
(10-15-2014 10:29 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:25 AM)bullitt_60 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:19 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:14 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 08:55 AM)EigenEagle Wrote: [ -> ]UL got the brakes beat off of them by a CUSA team that lost to a mediocre FCS. They got blown out by a Boise State that's clearly not what they once were. They barely beat Georgia State.
I'm not counting out the possibility that they're back on track but I want to see more than a big win over Texas State before I decide that.
Please explain to me why and how Southern is the class of the conference who have you beaten in the conference or out of conference that you should not have beaten. Moral victories don't count. If you want to look at strength of schedules only A-state has played a harder schedule. Arguably the two best teams in this conference will play on Tuesday. Until you beat the big boys you are just blowing smoke because we don't know and will not find out this year. Its not your fault you didn't make the schedule but its okay. The winner of Tuesday night game will win the conference. After state we have two very tough games because of rivalries USA and ULM. Just tired of Southern thinking they are world beaters anyone can count OC games but ask ULM they always do well but how many conference championships they won. Oh and you can say we look like crap but we like you are still undefeated in conference.
I must have misread, but I don't see where he said Southern is the class of the conference.
Don't get your panties in a bunch, you might blow a blood vessel.
He'll go away when stAte beats the brakes off them next week.
all the ulala fans were in hiding, and now they get a decent win and they are all back to being the best team in the conference. lol
lol, that's what I was thinking too
(10-15-2014 10:50 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:45 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:39 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:37 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:27 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ]You know, we've heard for the past 30 years that teams are built to stop the run. It doesn't happen often. But it's ok sweetie. Keep thumping your chest, because in 2 years, our team will be a lot better than it is now. Are you talking about this year, or in 2 years, because if you mean in 2 years, you are insane if you think a 10-2 team stays at home and a 6-6 team doesn't.
Well I'm sure stAte and ULL have the athletes to slow down southern. The script would be flipped inn a lot of ways and it would be your defense struggling to get off the field quick enough. I agree in2 years you will be better.. So will __________
I don't doubt they have the athletes to slow us down. Doesn't mean they would absolutely win.
It isn't the same type of getting better comparison though. Going by what most people on here said, we don't have good depth right now and we don't have FBS talent. So in 2 years we will have more depth and more talent, whereas you guys will have more of the same. So technically, we should improve by leaps and bounds over the next 2-3 years.
I'm just going by what you guys told us.
I'm not questioning your talent level at all. I know you guys are #2/#3 in this Conference IN UOUR FIRST FULL YEAR. That's impressive!
I just don't see you guys being to run the ball effectively enough to beat us. I'm not saying hold you under 100. You would be best running team we have faced but not most talented. We would hold you well under average.
Well hopefully Fritz is still around when we play you guys
Hopefully we can go a year without learning a new system under a new coach by then
Troy came in and dominated early in the conference also. However, you no longer get the bcs transfers with instant eligibility. You no longer can sell winning and competing for national titles. In one group you are recruiting to the top, now you are recruiting to the bottom. Trust me it's different, we have had coaches on our staff that came from very successful fcs programs like GS and they have said it's harder to sell a lower tier fbs than higher fcs. The talent level isn't all that different, usually it's grades that separates most not talent. There will be challenges and at some point they will catch up to GS, there will be a transition.
(10-15-2014 10:53 AM)Louisiana99 Wrote: [ -> ]However, you no longer get the bcs transfers with instant eligibility.
Please find a starter our roster who played BCS ball.
http://www.gseagles.com/roster.aspx?path=football
I'll wait.
(10-15-2014 10:53 AM)Louisiana99 Wrote: [ -> ]In one group you are recruiting to the top, now you are recruiting to the bottom.
True... but we are now talking to kids that wouldn't even take a look at us while we were FCS. Kid's now see us as Division 1.
Also.. how did Southern and App get the top 2 recruting class in the Country last year? Curious
http://247sports.com/Season/2014-Footbal...erence=SBC
(10-15-2014 10:53 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:50 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ]Well hopefully Fritz is still around when we play you guys
Hopefully we can go a year without learning a new system under a new coach by then
haha. I hear that. So you guys gonna be able to keep this one around for another year or two?
(10-15-2014 10:53 AM)Louisiana99 Wrote: [ -> ]Troy came in and dominated early in the conference also. However, you no longer get the bcs transfers with instant eligibility. You no longer can sell winning and competing for national titles. In one group you are recruiting to the top, now you are recruiting to the bottom. Trust me it's different, we have had coaches on our staff that came from very successful fcs programs like GS and they have said it's harder to sell a lower tier fbs than higher fcs. The talent level isn't all that different, usually it's grades that separates most not talent. There will be challenges and at some point they will catch up to GS, there will be a transition.
Luckily, we don't have to worry about the bcs transfer thing, seeing as how we rarely went that route, and when we did, it never worked out.
And yes, I will agree to the second point to some extent, but with that said, with Ark state and ULL supposedly having such better athletes, do you think those guys would have gone to GS over ULL or Ark State?
(10-15-2014 10:53 AM)Louisiana99 Wrote: [ -> ]Troy came in and dominated early in the conference also. However, you no longer get the bcs transfers with instant eligibility. You no longer can sell winning and competing for national titles. In one group you are recruiting to the top, now you are recruiting to the bottom. Trust me it's different, we have had coaches on our staff that came from very successful fcs programs like GS and they have said it's harder to sell a lower tier fbs than higher fcs. The talent level isn't all that different, usually it's grades that separates most not talent. There will be challenges and at some point they will catch up to GS, there will be a transition.
We don't have a single P5 transfer on our team to my knowledge. The only FBS transfer I know of is our backup QB who left FIU when Mario Cristobal was fired. Historically the FBS transfers that make impacts on our team are few and far in-between and most come from elite programs.
Interesting that you tell us our recruiting will take a hit. The thing we heard here is that we will need a few classes of "FBS recruits" before we can compete here.
(10-15-2014 11:00 AM)NCeagle Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2014 10:53 AM)RustonCAT Wrote: [ -> ][quote='NCeagle' pid='11251214' dateline='1413388247']
Well hopefully Fritz is still around when we play you guys
Hopefully we can go a year without learning a new system under a new coach by then
haha. I hear that. So you guys gonna be able to keep this one around for another year or two?
Right now I say yes...3 Million dollar but out first 3 years.
![[Image: ylial_zps530eee3c.gif]](http://s318.photobucket.com/user/gsu2583/media/ylial_zps530eee3c.gif.html)