09-17-2014, 04:16 PM
Remaining schedules:
11 games remaining:
Needs 5:
Cincy- home: Miami (Oh), Memphis, USF, Houstonaway: #23 Ohio st., Miami, SMU, Tulane, UConn, Temple
10 games remaining:
Needs 5:
Memphis- home: MTSU, Houston, Tulsa, USF, UConn away: #10 Ole Miss, Cincy, SMU, Temple, Tulane
Temple- home: Delaware st, Tulsa, ECU, Memphis, Cincy away: UConn, Houston, UCF, Penn st, Tulane
Needs 6:
SMU- home: #6 Tx A&M, TCU, Cincy, Memphis, USF, Houston away: ECU, Tulsa, UCF, UConn
UCF- home: Bethune-Cookman, #21 BYU, Tulane, Temple, Tulsa, SMU away: Houston, UConn, USF, ECU
9 games remaining:
Needs 4:
ECU- home: UNC, SMU, UConn, Tulane, UCF away: USF, Temple, Cincy, Tulsa
Needs 5:
Connecticut- home: Temple, UCF, Cincy, SMU away: USF, Tulane, ECU, Army, Memphis
Houston- home: UNLV, UCF, Temple, Tulane, Tulsa away: Memphis, USF, SMU, Cincy
Tulane- home: Uconn, Cincy, Memphis, Temple away: Duke, Rutgers, UCF, Houston, ECU
Tulsa- home: Tx st, USF, SMU, ECU away: Colorado st, Temple, Memphis, UCF, Houston
USF- home: Uconn, ECU, Houston, UCF away: #19 Wisonsin, Tulsa, Cincy, SMU, Memphis
My take:
Good to go- Cincy, Memphis, UCF, ECU, Houston
On watch: Temple, Tulsa
Danger zone: SMU, Uconn, USF
Undecided: Tulane
I used a really simple (and probably inaccurate) to create these groups. I placed a 0, .5 or 1 (lose, win or couldn't decide) on each upcoming opponent. +/-1 from the number of games needed decided their category. .5 from the amount of games needed placed the team in the "on watch" category. AAC games that weren't an exact toss up were not necessarily .5s for each team (say USF should have 1 for Uconn at home, but Uconn may have a .5 for USF). The goal here was to give teams at their best shot to go bowling. As the season develops I'll change it to the most realistic shot of making a bowl.
11 games remaining:
Needs 5:
Cincy- home: Miami (Oh), Memphis, USF, Houstonaway: #23 Ohio st., Miami, SMU, Tulane, UConn, Temple
10 games remaining:
Needs 5:
Memphis- home: MTSU, Houston, Tulsa, USF, UConn away: #10 Ole Miss, Cincy, SMU, Temple, Tulane
Temple- home: Delaware st, Tulsa, ECU, Memphis, Cincy away: UConn, Houston, UCF, Penn st, Tulane
Needs 6:
SMU- home: #6 Tx A&M, TCU, Cincy, Memphis, USF, Houston away: ECU, Tulsa, UCF, UConn
UCF- home: Bethune-Cookman, #21 BYU, Tulane, Temple, Tulsa, SMU away: Houston, UConn, USF, ECU
9 games remaining:
Needs 4:
ECU- home: UNC, SMU, UConn, Tulane, UCF away: USF, Temple, Cincy, Tulsa
Needs 5:
Connecticut- home: Temple, UCF, Cincy, SMU away: USF, Tulane, ECU, Army, Memphis
Houston- home: UNLV, UCF, Temple, Tulane, Tulsa away: Memphis, USF, SMU, Cincy
Tulane- home: Uconn, Cincy, Memphis, Temple away: Duke, Rutgers, UCF, Houston, ECU
Tulsa- home: Tx st, USF, SMU, ECU away: Colorado st, Temple, Memphis, UCF, Houston
USF- home: Uconn, ECU, Houston, UCF away: #19 Wisonsin, Tulsa, Cincy, SMU, Memphis
My take:
Good to go- Cincy, Memphis, UCF, ECU, Houston
On watch: Temple, Tulsa
Danger zone: SMU, Uconn, USF
Undecided: Tulane
I used a really simple (and probably inaccurate) to create these groups. I placed a 0, .5 or 1 (lose, win or couldn't decide) on each upcoming opponent. +/-1 from the number of games needed decided their category. .5 from the amount of games needed placed the team in the "on watch" category. AAC games that weren't an exact toss up were not necessarily .5s for each team (say USF should have 1 for Uconn at home, but Uconn may have a .5 for USF). The goal here was to give teams at their best shot to go bowling. As the season develops I'll change it to the most realistic shot of making a bowl.