09-16-2014, 11:41 PM
Rushing attempts per game. 2-4 are Navy, Air Force and Army. But only 55% of our total yards have come on the ground. 71% of Arkansas' total yards have come via the ground.
(09-16-2014 11:59 PM)17Huskies Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting...up 16 from 2013. I really think that will balance out, i think it's a few things:
1. The Presby game...we weren't going to throw much, it got out of hand quickly and we ran super vanilla stuff.
2. UNLV, they couldn't stop it...we ran the same dang run play 5 straight times at one point.
3. I think we all now they've been holding back on some of the creativity to a small extent at times.
(09-17-2014 10:56 AM)HuskieJWN Wrote: [ -> ]That's inflated for the beginning of the season.
They kicked the crap out if Presbyterian so they ran the ball to keep clock churning. Then UNLV couldn't stop the run.
I bet they pass at least 30 times this game and rush around 45-50. I don't know how many plays will be run but I'd bet 80-90. Really depends on how slow the Arkansas drives are.
NIU will certainly be in top 10 in attempts by years end though. They're good at it and they should have a lot of leads.
But guys, remember Toledo has a better rushing attack. All because Kareem hunt has a better ypc.
(09-17-2014 11:06 AM)HuskieJohn Wrote: [ -> ](09-17-2014 10:56 AM)HuskieJWN Wrote: [ -> ]That's inflated for the beginning of the season.
They kicked the crap out if Presbyterian so they ran the ball to keep clock churning. Then UNLV couldn't stop the run.
I bet they pass at least 30 times this game and rush around 45-50. I don't know how many plays will be run but I'd bet 80-90. Really depends on how slow the Arkansas drives are.
NIU will certainly be in top 10 in attempts by years end though. They're good at it and they should have a lot of leads.
But guys, remember Toledo has a better rushing attack. All because Kareem hunt has a better ypc.
I dont disagree but the second half had a running clock...so even if we had an incomplete pass or ran out of bounds the clock kept on ticking.
(09-17-2014 11:08 AM)timxlydon Wrote: [ -> ](09-17-2014 11:06 AM)HuskieJohn Wrote: [ -> ](09-17-2014 10:56 AM)HuskieJWN Wrote: [ -> ]That's inflated for the beginning of the season.
They kicked the crap out if Presbyterian so they ran the ball to keep clock churning. Then UNLV couldn't stop the run.
I bet they pass at least 30 times this game and rush around 45-50. I don't know how many plays will be run but I'd bet 80-90. Really depends on how slow the Arkansas drives are.
NIU will certainly be in top 10 in attempts by years end though. They're good at it and they should have a lot of leads.
But guys, remember Toledo has a better rushing attack. All because Kareem hunt has a better ypc.
I dont disagree but the second half had a running clock...so even if we had an incomplete pass or ran out of bounds the clock kept on ticking.
How does that work?
(09-17-2014 11:13 AM)HuskieJohn Wrote: [ -> ](09-17-2014 11:08 AM)timxlydon Wrote: [ -> ](09-17-2014 11:06 AM)HuskieJohn Wrote: [ -> ](09-17-2014 10:56 AM)HuskieJWN Wrote: [ -> ]That's inflated for the beginning of the season.
They kicked the crap out if Presbyterian so they ran the ball to keep clock churning. Then UNLV couldn't stop the run.
I bet they pass at least 30 times this game and rush around 45-50. I don't know how many plays will be run but I'd bet 80-90. Really depends on how slow the Arkansas drives are.
NIU will certainly be in top 10 in attempts by years end though. They're good at it and they should have a lot of leads.
But guys, remember Toledo has a better rushing attack. All because Kareem hunt has a better ypc.
I dont disagree but the second half had a running clock...so even if we had an incomplete pass or ran out of bounds the clock kept on ticking.
How does that work?
Both coaches agreed to it because of the score and maybe even the weather. Its basically the slaughter rule for football just not automatic.