CSNbbs

CSNBBS AAC Regular Season Champions - Memphis Tigers


Week 1:

1. UCF (13) 376
2. ECU (11) 344
3. Temple (4) 311
4. Memphis (2) 272
5. Tulsa 258
6. Tulane 175
7. USF 139
8. Houston 136
9. UCONN 111
10. SMU 74

Others Receiving Votes: Cincinnati (4) 220

Number of abstaining votes for specific teams:
Cincinnati 11
ECU 1
Temple 1
UCONN 1

Of the votes received (place instead of points), Cincinnati averaged 8.8. That is not quite third place.


Week 2:

1. UCF (14) 296
2. ECU (6) 295
3. Memphis (7) 248
4. Temple (4) 240
5. Houston 146
6. USF 144
7. Tulsa 130
8. Tulane 124
9. UCONN 78
10. SMU 45

Others Receiving Votes: Cincinnati (8) 154

Number of abstaining votes for specific teams:
Cincinnati 14

Of the votes received (place instead of points), Cincinnati averaged 9.625. That is between 2nd and 3rd place.


Week 3:

1. ECU (40) 478
2. Cincy (4) 439
3. Memphis (1) 358
4. UCF 348
5. Temple 308
6. Houston 273
7. Tulane 190
8. UCONN 167
9. USF 129
10. Tulsa 118
11. SMU 50


Week 4:

1. ECU (27) 307
2. Cincy (1) 272
3. Memphis 240
4. UCF 232
5. Temple 189
6. Houston 172
7. USF 122
8. Tulane 105
9. Tulsa 92
10. UCONN 66
11. SMU 28


Week 5:

1. ECU (34) 374
2. Cincy 290
3. Memphis 288
4. UCF 283
5. Temple 249
6. Houston 199
7. USF 172
8. Tulane 106
9. UCONN 89
10. Tulsa 88
11. SMU 36


Week 6:

1. ECU (31) 370
2. Memphis (5) 343
3. UCF 291
4. Temple 270
5. Houston 222
6. Cincy 210
7. USF 175
8. Tulane 116
9. UCONN 86
10. Tulsa 71
11. SMU 55


Week 7:

1. ECU (45) 515
2. UCF (2) 460
3. Temple (1) 403
4. Houston 370
5. Memphis 350
6. USF 260
7. Cincy 250
8. Tulane 173
9. Tulsa 121
11. UConn, SMU 87


Week 8:

1. ECU (27) 297
2. UCF 263
3. Houston 247
4. Memphis 216
5. Temple 178
6. Cincy 166
7. USF 143
8. Tulane 98
9. Tulsa 89
10. UConn 48
11. SMU 32


Week 9:

1. ECU (41) 526
2. UCF (10) 499
3. Memphis 407
4. Houston 403
5. Cincy 355
6. Temple 287
7. USF 245
8. Tulane 183
9. UConn 132
10. Tulsa 130
11. SMU 50


Week 10:

1. Houston (13) 337
2. Memphis (6) 325
3. ECU (14) 316
4. UCF (4) 272
5. Cincy 265
6. Temple 211
7. USF 148
8. UConn 128
9. Tulane 93
10. Tulsa 79
11. SMU 35


Week 11:

1. Memphis (21) 360
2. ECU (13) 338
4. UCF (1) 289
4. Cincy 289
5. Houston 229
6. Temple 217
7. Tulane 158
8. USF 136
9. UConn 99
10. Tulsa 79
11. SMU 34


Week 12:

1. Memphis (30) 348
2. Cincy (2) 314
4. UCF 288
4. ECU 263
5. Houston 223
6. Temple 195
7. USF 153
8. Tulan 130
9. UConn 88
10. Tulsa 75
11. SMU 32


Week 13:

1. Memphis (24) 329
2. Cincy (7) 306
4. UCF 276 (3)
4. ECU 258 (1)
5. Houston 210
6. Temple 178
7. USF 137
8. Tulan 114
9. UConn 79
10. Tulsa 76
11. SMU 31


Week 14:

1. Memphis (29) 395
2. Cincy (6) 360
3. UCF (4) 339
4. ECU 307
5. Houston 258
6. Temple 215
7. USF 177
8. Tulan 139
9. Tulsa 103
10. UConn 91
11. SMU 37


Week 15:

1. Memphis (15) 223
2. Cincy (6) 211
2. UCF (10) 211
4. ECU 162
5. Houston 147
6. Temple 125
7. USF 100
8. Tulane 75
9. Tulsa 67
10. UConn 37
11. SMU 24


Formula: 11pts for first place, 10 for second, etc. Ties had the point value for the lowest place in the tie. Both teams receive the same point total for the tie.

Views for Rank the AAC and CSNBBS AAC Weekly Poll Results threads:

Week 1: 5,934
Week 2: 4,311
Week 3: 9,166
Week 4: 6,242
Week 5: 4,679
Week 6: 4,363
Week 7: 5,340
Week 8: 4,565
Week 9: 6,283
Week 10: 7,271
Week 11: 3,940
Week 12: 4,152
Week 13: 4,170
Week 14: 7,232
Week 15: 1,068

CSNBBS AAC Weekly Poll Results: 4,839 and counting

Total views for the Rank the AAC and CSNBBS AAC Weekly Poll Results threads: 83,303

Mods: Pin this at the top if you desire. Either I or someone else can run the poll each week and update it. If someone wants to volunteer, let me know and I'll hand it over. Otherwise, I'll post a separate thread each week and come back here to update the pinned thread when the week is over.

Thanks for tabulating

(09-16-2014 03:24 PM)Bearcat2012 Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for tabulating

No problem. It will be interesting to see the teams float up and down as the season goes on.

I consolidated the results into the first post allowing for discussion in following posts.

(10-01-2014 09:02 AM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]I consolidated the results into the first post allowing for discussion in following posts.

Thank you for your work on this apex.

Greatly appreciated.

3 seems like our peak in my opinion. Great start to the season!

(10-01-2014 11:19 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote: [ -> ]3 seems like our peak in my opinion. Great start to the season!

Top 3 in the conference is always a nice thing. Cincy is in your control and if ECU stumbles you could very well sit at #1.

(10-01-2014 11:57 AM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-01-2014 11:19 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote: [ -> ]3 seems like our peak in my opinion. Great start to the season!

Top 3 in the conference is always a nice thing. Cincy is in your control and if ECU stumbles you could very well sit at #1.

I am just glad to have a great squad to root for. I will let the course of the season take it place to see where we truely stand. I think we finish 4th or 5th while going bowling.

Not much separating 2-4 right now according to everyone who voted. Seems about right to me.

OP has been updated with Week 6 results.

Some personal observations/opinions on the trends... ECU was still considered the #1 team by almost everyone with Memphis having the same support for its #2 position (Memphis fans: the board has overwhelmingly shown you respect this week). It was pretty back and forth as to who should be 3th/4th between UCF and Temple, though UCF garnered some higher place votes (for #2) that helped them pull away. It was a complete toss up between Houston and Cincy. The deciding factor that kept it from being closer were a few votes having Cincy ranked extremely low. Almost everyone thought USF was 7th by themselves. The last 4 teams were voted all over 8-11 but the final results are as you see them.

(10-01-2014 11:57 AM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-01-2014 11:19 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote: [ -> ]3 seems like our peak in my opinion. Great start to the season!

Top 3 in the conference is always a nice thing. Cincy is in your control and if ECU stumbles you could very well sit at #1.

Well, we took care of that first part. Now we need ECU to cooperate.

Nice job. Thank you for doing this.

(10-07-2014 11:05 AM)TripleA Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-01-2014 11:57 AM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-01-2014 11:19 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote: [ -> ]3 seems like our peak in my opinion. Great start to the season!

Top 3 in the conference is always a nice thing. Cincy is in your control and if ECU stumbles you could very well sit at #1.

Well, we took care of that first part. Now we need ECU to cooperate.

I see a ton of tripping points...USF, Temple, Cincy and UCF. It could very well happen. Even Tulsa on the road as a WTF game. That's almost our entire schedule for potential losses. Most of them aren't likely, but WTF games don't care about "likely." Best of luck to you throughout the rest of the season. Your winning out only helps the AAC.

Some shakeup in the poll this week.

The Temple/Houston game should really show where the separation iine is in this conference. UCF/Tulane will likely play a part, from a records standpoint, in widening the gap between the top and bottom halves of the conference.

(10-14-2014 06:46 PM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]The Temple/Houston game should really show where the separation iine is in this conference. UCF/Tulane will likely play a part, from a records standpoint, in widening the gap between the top and bottom halves of the conference.

Demonstrate please

(10-14-2014 06:52 PM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-14-2014 06:46 PM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]The Temple/Houston game should really show where the separation iine is in this conference. UCF/Tulane will likely play a part, from a records standpoint, in widening the gap between the top and bottom halves of the conference.

Demonstrate please

Basically the standings start to appear more similar to the rankings. I think the Temple/Houston game will answer a lot of question marks no matter who wins. It will either validate or expose Temple. It most likely will tell us if UTSA was an aberration for UH. A close, hard fought game could prove both teams belong in the upper half. Or a close, poorly played game by both teams supporting the idea maybe both aren't legit. This is mid-season. A lot more can be realized now than the first few games. I fully expect UCF to beat Tulane...pushing them further from the top of e conference.

Nothing earth shattering. Just trying to spur on conversation. By the way, I believe Memphis is clearly a top-half team.

(10-14-2014 09:10 PM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-14-2014 06:52 PM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-14-2014 06:46 PM)apex_pirate Wrote: [ -> ]The Temple/Houston game should really show where the separation iine is in this conference. UCF/Tulane will likely play a part, from a records standpoint, in widening the gap between the top and bottom halves of the conference.

Demonstrate please

Basically the standings start to appear more similar to the rankings. I think the Temple/Houston game will answer a lot of question marks no matter who wins. It will either validate or expose Temple. It most likely will tell us if UTSA was an aberration for UH. A close, hard fought game could prove both teams belong in the upper half. Or a close, poorly played game by both teams supporting the idea maybe both aren't legit. This is mid-season. A lot more can be realized now than the first few games. I fully expect UCF to beat Tulane...pushing them further from the top of e conference.

Nothing earth shattering. Just trying to spur on conversation. By the way, I believe Memphis is clearly a top-half team.

I was just trying to understand the post

Week 8 results are now in the OP.

So a week ago, the poll was like this:

Quote:Week 7:
8. Tulane 173
9. Tulsa 121

And then Tulane lost 20-13 @UCF, and Tulsa lost 38-30 at home vs South Florida. And so now the poll has been changed like this:

Quote:Week 8:
8. Tulane 98
9. Tulsa 89

I don't get that.