TommyHawkChimp: after watching the U vs. Due game.
"We shouldn't have to punt and Rawls should run for 300 yards."
The entire Michigan team couldn't rush for 300 yards on anyone, so I doubt your scUM 4th string retread will be putting fear in them.
Chippit: "years from now the Bronco faithful will be talking about their near win against the mighty Boilers, while the Chips brought shame and disgrace to the MAC with their pathetic win over some nameless foe."
I have to agree with Armpit. This was no moral victory. On the other hand we have Slappies on several forums trying to convince skeptical MAC fans (and some of their own fans) that Chatty was a great FCS program and it was an amazing performance to overcome that early "mental lapse."
Chip1rube: "WMU players looking as weak and fragile as ever. Every time I tuned in I saw some brown cow on the deck writhe ring in pain.
Relying on one player is not a recipe for success. "
I agree Rube. I was feeling bad when I saw that "end of my career look" on Tightazz's face. I'm wondering what one player you'll be relying on next week. I hope you don't spot the Boilers 16 early, cause they've got a QB who can execute a forward pass.
Our linebackers are going to have to man up against Rawls.
(08-31-2014 01:30 PM)Hiller4Hyz09 Wrote: [ -> ]Our linebackers are going to have to man up against Rawls.
I don't know how he was the 4th string RB at scUM......or maybe Chatty just wasn't that good.
Chiprube1: " the only only WMU player who was close to decent was the RB Franklin. Rawls should have a field day at Purdue."
Franklin's close to "decent day" consisted of 163 yards against BIG size. Rawls had 123 yards. He probably felt like he was running against the UM scout team.
Braverman apparently didn't have a "descent day." Only had 132 yards. Tightazz had 11 yards before stubbing his toe.
Uhhh ohhhh...... Slappy fight taking place between Chipsrule and Ncaaballer.
Rule mentioned MSU in a post and NCAA called him out as being Dip the Sockpuppet.
Damn, ya got me
Go ahead Chip mod, do your duty and ban me........errrr my Sockpuppet I.d. "Chipsrule." I admit it, it's me, so do your duty, ban away. I admit, I have 5 or six other I.d.s there as well, but believe me when I tell you I'm not Chip70. By no means should you ban him, he's a loyal Chip through and through. And even though A10 constantly mocks Enos, I'm not him either........seriously, I'm not him. So don't ban him either.
Can't believe I read on there that someone said Celiscar should've been ejected for targeting on the play he got knocked out cold.
You stay classy CMU.
(08-31-2014 03:09 PM)Hoekjeness Wrote: [ -> ]Can't believe I read on there that someone said Celiscar should've been ejected for targeting on the play he got knocked out cold.
You stay classy CMU.
Yes, I agree, he should have been ejected. And while we're talking injustice, how can Enos sideline Florey, especially with Davis going down? He's basing his decision only on a video of Florey shoplifting........TWICE. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Many on Slappy Illy were lamenting after the Davis injury, "How long must this young man pay for his mistake (that he made TWICE)."
(08-31-2014 03:19 PM)Chipdip2 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2014 03:09 PM)Hoekjeness Wrote: [ -> ]Can't believe I read on there that someone said Celiscar should've been ejected for targeting on the play he got knocked out cold.
You stay classy CMU.
Yes, I agree, he should have been ejected. And while we're talking injustice, how can Enos sideline Florey, especially with Davis going down? He's basing his decision only on a video of Florey shoplifting........TWICE. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Many on Slappy Illy were lamenting after the Davis injury, "How long must this young man pay for his mistake (that he made TWICE)."
The announcers were both saying that at the time, that's the source of that chip "insight".
Slappy, Tommyhawk said this, and he's totally serious.
"Rawls over and under this week, 250 yards."
Of course his Slappy logic is if a Browncow can run for 163 on Purdue, our new hero
will easily get a 100 more.
I only wish I had this kind of blind optimism. In spite of Braverman's and Franlin's performance, I wouldn't be surprised if neither had a 100 yards against Idaho. Teams watch film, they know what to key on. Unless your name is Barry Sanders defenses can adjust and take things away...........even from a 4th string scUM retread.
Actually. Rawls was impressive the other night. It just shows the different level that Big 10 plays at.
And Celiscars hit was scary. Had he knocked out the Purdue player I think there might have been a targeting flag. But since it was him who got his bell rung no call was made.
Any word on his condition?
(08-31-2014 06:01 PM)WheresWaldo42 Wrote: [ -> ]Actually. Rawls was impressive the other night. It just shows the different level that Big 10 plays at.
And Celiscars hit was scary. Had he knocked out the Purdue player I think there might have been a targeting flag. But since it was him who got his bell rung no call was made.
Any word on his condition?
http://www.mlive.com/broncos/index.ssf/2...cart_river
HIPAA laws don't allow for much information to be released. Just another article telling us something we already knew.
Slappies are now concerned that recruit Rayshawn Wilborn may get poached by a BCS program.
Slappy BW stated that Dantonio has too much respect for Snoozer Dan and would never do that, but Brady Hoke would.
Slappy Tommyhawk, a clear insider stated that Dantonio and Snoozer have an inside agreement
to not offer each others players
Yes, I'm sure Dantonio is mortified that the legendary coach from Dismal Flats would try and poach his players.
Is it possible that the reason Dantonio doesn't poach Snoozers recruits is that he doesn't recruit any players that he is interested in. Nahhhhhhh
(08-31-2014 06:01 PM)WheresWaldo42 Wrote: [ -> ]Actually. Rawls was impressive the other night. It just shows the different level that Big 10 plays at.
Or maybe Chatty wasn't that good.
Watched the UT vs. NH game. They really blew out the #4 ranked FCS team. That's a scary team. Play makers at every spot. That 4th string retread QB they got from Bama could probably start for scUM.
(08-31-2014 10:23 PM)Chipdip2 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2014 06:01 PM)WheresWaldo42 Wrote: [ -> ]Actually. Rawls was impressive the other night. It just shows the different level that Big 10 plays at.
Or maybe Chatty wasn't that good.
Watched the UT vs. NH game. They really blew out the #4 ranked FCS team. That's a scary team. Play makers at every spot. That 4th string retread QB they got from Bama could probably start for scUM.
That 4th string retread qb might have been the bama started had he stuck around. He just saw them signing top 10 qbs every year and he was not given a ton of stars 3*. But he did have big time offers and he will be at Toledo for another year after this which is scary. We have seen what qbs can do in this league.
Slappies now have a thread warning them about this thread, and to be careful what they post
They conclude that I mock them because of their amazing success.
No, I mock you because you say so many stupid things.
Speaking of Franklin and the MAC FOY award, Corey Willis returned 2 kicks to the 22 and the 24 and the Slappies gave him the coveted Slappy label of "a beast."