CSNbbs

Full Version: Photog gets backlash over posting photos of daughter (link NSFW)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
And we're all supposed to feel indignant over the violation of his freedom of expression (see the comments).

Until you see the photos.

This guy is sick. And even if you think he's ok, what kind of father would post such pics where actual pervs could get them?

http://petapixel.com/2014/08/22/photogra...responded/

Link NSFW (Not just NSFW, but contains what could be construed as child porn).
He's a pervert. No one takes pictures of their children in those ways.
Is it me or does it seem like way to many photographers are into this schit?
No way I'm clicking on that at work.
(08-25-2014 03:45 PM)Smaug Wrote: [ -> ]No way I'm clicking on that at work.

Good call. I'm regretting my choice.
(08-25-2014 03:42 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]He's a pervert. No one takes pictures of their children in those ways.

You think so? He really doesn't need to take photos when he can see the girl naked any time he wants. I have pictures of me sitting in the kitchen sink totally naked getting a bath when I was about 1 year old. Porn? Nah. Would I post them on the internet? No.

The pervs of the world have ruined the innocence of childhood.
(08-25-2014 03:46 PM)DrTorch Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-25-2014 03:45 PM)Smaug Wrote: [ -> ]No way I'm clicking on that at work.

Good call. I'm regretting my choice.

YEP.

A NSFW tag definitely should have been used in the OP.

My internet usage is not monitored by anyone, but I have 4 people sitting right behind me now. If any of them had turned around just now I would have looked like a pervert to them.
OH MY GAD.


I feel like I'm being monitored now, and I immediately closed out after the belly pic. DA FUQ!
(08-25-2014 03:46 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-25-2014 03:42 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]He's a pervert. No one takes pictures of their children in those ways.

You think so? He really doesn't need to take photos when he can see the girl naked any time he wants. I have pictures of me sitting in the kitchen sink totally naked getting a bath when I was about 1 year old. Porn? Nah. Would I post them on the internet? No.

The pervs of the world have ruined the innocence of childhood.

Exactly how you put it. It belongs in the family photo album, no where else.

I hope we don't get into trouble for watching that.
(08-25-2014 03:57 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-25-2014 03:46 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-25-2014 03:42 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]He's a pervert. No one takes pictures of their children in those ways.

You think so? He really doesn't need to take photos when he can see the girl naked any time he wants. I have pictures of me sitting in the kitchen sink totally naked getting a bath when I was about 1 year old. Porn? Nah. Would I post them on the internet? No.

The pervs of the world have ruined the innocence of childhood.

Exactly how you put it. It belongs in the family photo album, no where else.

I hope we don't get into trouble for watching that.

I don't know that it even belongs there. Babies running around without a diaper on or bath time photos are one thing, but these were staged photos.

They're on a different level IMO.
Luckily, I clicked on that link over the weekend when I was at home.
(08-25-2014 03:59 PM)EverRespect Wrote: [ -> ]Luckily, I clicked on that link over the weekend when I was at home.

Shouldn't this be against the law? Posting these type of pictures.
(08-25-2014 03:58 PM)Niner National Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-25-2014 03:57 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-25-2014 03:46 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-25-2014 03:42 PM)olliebaba Wrote: [ -> ]He's a pervert. No one takes pictures of their children in those ways.

You think so? He really doesn't need to take photos when he can see the girl naked any time he wants. I have pictures of me sitting in the kitchen sink totally naked getting a bath when I was about 1 year old. Porn? Nah. Would I post them on the internet? No.

The pervs of the world have ruined the innocence of childhood.

Exactly how you put it. It belongs in the family photo album, no where else.

I hope we don't get into trouble for watching that.

I don't know that it even belongs there. Babies running around without a diaper on or bath time photos are one thing, but these were staged photos.

They're on a different level IMO.

Great point. Those were strange poses in locations outside of the home. Not something to do. And I don't blame the other pervs, I blame this father.
Are the pictures of naked Africans in my National Geographics porn or in bad taste?
(08-25-2014 04:09 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]Are the pictures of naked Africans in my National Geographics porn or in bad taste?

Lol, I think they're fully dressed... So maybe, bad taste?
(08-25-2014 04:09 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]Are the pictures of naked Africans in my National Geographics porn or in bad taste?

If that's their culture and you need to take pictures of their tribes then it's neither. But this little girl does not go around nude, she puts on clothes in public.
All of these photos would be quite innocent if not for the staging. This is a case of someone allowing their "artistic expression" to get in the way of their "better judgment". Regardless of innocence, there is no excuse for placing many of those pics in the public domain. Publicly releasing these photos is CREEPY...especially given the number of sickos out there.
I am not going to click on the pics. The posts here explain it enough. People, protect your children. There are some sick people out there.
(08-25-2014 06:17 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote: [ -> ]I am not going to click on the pics. The posts here explain it enough. People, protect your children. There are some sick people out there.

The pics aren't that bad, they're no worse than pictures we probably have of us in youth or our kids when they were young. The bottom line, to me anyway, is that these pics are of someone else's kid that I have no interest in, sorta like when a guy at work passes around pictures of his kids and you look at them even though you don't want to.

And posting them online was dumb.
If these photos would have been spontaneous and not staged? I would have though they were OK in that context. The fact that this guy took his child and posed her in various stages of undress and then nude squatting on a road?..Is creeepy as schit. I am not sure that this is not grounds for child CPS to be involved with. If I was him?....Id be watching for a knock on the door from CPS. I am sorry for this little girl.

Another thing. Where the hell is this kids mother? NO fcking way my wife would have allowed such nonsense.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's