CSNbbs

...by responding as if the article were a high school paper.

Nothing works better than ridicule done in a comedic mode..

Man! That’s a beat down.

Walmart also should have said they pay their women employees the same as they pay their male employees. The Times can't say that.

(06-26-2014 08:55 PM)smn1256 Wrote: [ -> ]Walmart also should have said they pay their women employees the same as they pay their male employees. The Times can't say that.

Hahaha

Well done Walmart. It is hilarious to read articles written by people who have no idea how economics work....

I love wal mart. got me some beach tshirts flip flops, for 7 bucks a pop. cashiers are nice too.

I despise Wal Mart and am on the side of the Times here. Wal Mart doesn't actually directly contradict or attack any of the points.

What do you mean, didn't counter any of the points?

Heck, it looked like the author countered EVERY major point the article tried to make.

Their replies are mostly non-specific and are as loose as the acquisitions.

(06-27-2014 11:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: [ -> ]Their replies are mostly non-specific and are as loose as the acquisitions.

Well, tit for tat I guess.