CSNbbs

Full Version: Mann makes a tangible CAGW prediction
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Since dmac claims predictions aren't actually made by "climate scientists."

Well sort of, since Mann's English skills are as bad as his science, some of the prose here is gibberish. But I think one can sift out his intent from the article, or at least the pretty pictures he made.

So, lets see how they hold up.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/se...ld-in-2036

Oh, and Mann's attorneys are still messing up their lawsuits against Steyn, NR etc. A touch disingenuous for someone so hurt.
(03-21-2014 03:21 PM)DrTorch Wrote: [ -> ]Since dmac claims predictions aren't actually made by "climate scientists."

Well sort of, since Mann's English skills are as bad as his science, some of the prose here is gibberish. But I think one can sift out his intent from the article, or at least the pretty pictures he made.

So, lets see how they hold up.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/se...ld-in-2036

Oh, and Mann's attorneys are still messing up their lawsuits against Steyn, NR etc. A touch disingenuous for someone so hurt.

2036. I don't feel like waiting two decades to find out, with certainty, that something bad is actually going to happen.

But I suppose it's better than claiming that the sky is falling right now.
Reference URL's