CSNbbs

Full Version: Rutgers
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I don't think they deserve to go bowling when you look at their season.
1. A .500 record 6 & 6
2. Lost 5 of their last 7 games.
3. Didn't beat anyone with a winning record.
4. Failed to score more than 20 points in last 7 games.
.
They did play a tougher schedule than most SBC teams but still any way you spin it it is not bowl worthy. They did meet the minimum requirement but I bet any of 7 SBC teams could of beat them this season.
AAC has a contract...so opinion does not factor into it...that's why it's nice to be in a conference with a nice bowl set up.
This is why they need to set the rule that all 7-5 teams must be used before using 6-6 teams.
(12-08-2013 03:41 PM)UofMemphis Wrote: [ -> ]AAC has a contract...so opinion does not factor into it...that's why it's nice to be in a conference with a nice bowl set up.
.
I know, but still I think it's not fair. 01-lauramac2
Amazing how contracts hold up everywhere else, but are just guidelines in the SBC.
(12-08-2013 04:27 PM)galojah Wrote: [ -> ]Amazing how contracts hold up everywhere else, but are just guidelines in the SBC.


It is funny.

Though had we enforced the contract in the SBC, Bowls would have turned out the same.
Reference URL's