Who are these morons in the booth in the Auburn/Bama game? It is one thing to have enough evidence to overturn a bad call. But how in hell do you find enough evidence to overturn the correct calls on the field? The Bama TD was close and i can see how just maybe there was enough. But the Auburn TD was not even close. Both angles combined showed the ball CLEARLY went inside the pylon.
(11-30-2013 05:32 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: [ -> ]Who are these morons in the booth in the Auburn/Bama game? It is one thing to have enough evidence to overturn a bad call. But how in hell do you find enough evidence to overturn the correct calls on the field? The Bama TD was close and i can see how just maybe there was enough. But the Auburn TD was not even close. Both angles combined showed the ball CLEARLY went inside the pylon.
They spotted the ball in the UT-Vandy game without seeing the ball. It was the right call, though.
I think they should remove the word indisputable from the rule. Just admit that it's purely a judgement call.
They gave nick his one second though. Lol.
Nick's one second of Hell!!!!!!!!
Even though both TDs were scored on the following play, those reviews will be under a microscope with the Head of SEC Officiating. The second one was a lot worse than the first!!!
(11-30-2013 11:06 PM)TallTiger Wrote: [ -> ]Even though both TDs were scored on the following play, those reviews will be under a microscope with the Head of SEC Officiating. The second one was a lot worse than the first!!!
even if it was not a touchdown, how in the heck was it placed on the one yard line. how arbitrary was that? from edging the pylon back to the one yard line
