CSNbbs

By keeping the CA's digital content properly sanitized, I have a quick snippet of today's article on our upcoming starting 5. Having said that, I'd like to see what everyone thinks about who the starting 5 will be.

If my snippet is too revealing then someone please let me know and I will remove hosting the image! I was just really curious as to what fellow tiger fans thought.

Notice the final score! whoa!

That lineup really isn't hard to guess. Also, it's Jason's impression, not Josh's commitment yet. Too far away.

Why rubbed out the names? But this still won't make me pay for the site, I can wait until someone mentions it for free

^ True. Obvious.

I won't be shocked by that starting 5, either.

(10-23-2013 02:22 PM)holysheetman Wrote: [ -> ]By keeping the CA's digital content properly sanitized, I have a quick snippet of today's article on our upcoming starting 5. Having said that, I'd like to see what everyone thinks about who the starting 5 will be.

If my snippet is too revealing then someone please let me know and I will remove hosting the image! I was just really curious as to what fellow tiger fans thought.

Notice the final score! whoa!

Must have been the same refs from the Lville game.

Well we know which five won't see much court time together. At least at the start of the season.

(10-23-2013 03:25 PM)QuitoTiger Wrote: [ -> ]

who knows how it will be interpreted anyways; that's the reason I blurred out the players names, there's got to be something in the snippet that has some value to the CA so I don't want to piss them off =)

41-16 was really shocking no matter the lineup.

(10-23-2013 04:18 PM)holysheetman Wrote: [ -> ]41-16 was really shocking no matter the lineup.

Clutch was slipping.

(10-23-2013 04:18 PM)midtowncowboy Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2013 04:18 PM)holysheetman Wrote: [ -> ]41-16 was really shocking no matter the lineup.

Clutch was slipping.

could be! good point!

(10-23-2013 03:15 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote: [ -> ]Why rubbed out the names? But this still won't make me pay for the site, I can wait until someone mentions it for free

So people can guess. And it's a pay article.

Baylor goes 7'1" and 6'9" across the front, so I'm hoping we don't use this as an opportunity to work on our 4-guard offense with Iverson at the 5 or some similar nonsense. We have three serviceable bigs -- why not rotate 'em and keep two on the floor the majority of the time. Just 'cause you got a bunch of shiny pennies don't mean you leave your quarters in your pocket.

I think the starting five will change as the season progresses just as it did last year. CJP has started the players who practice well and consistently.
Since the team has better depth than in years past, I think he will start with experience and let the incoming class of freshmen ease into the game by picking the spots to give them their minutes.

I have not read the article, but here is my guess as to who will be starting at the beginning of the regular season, not the exhibition.

Joe Jackson, Geron Johnson, Shaq Goodwin, Michael Dixon, with either Michael Wilson or David Pellom rounding out the starting five.

But it will change probably as the season progresses. A season having no players with head games helps. Buy into the program, play as a team, lose as a team, and strive to improve every week until the final game.

(10-23-2013 05:50 PM)SayWhat? Wrote: [ -> ]I think the starting five will change as the season progresses just as it did last year. CJP has started the players who practice well and consistently.
Since the team has better depth than in years past, I think he will start with experience and let the incoming class of freshmen ease into the game by picking the spots to give them their minutes.

I have not read the article, but here is my guess as to who will be starting at the beginning of the regular season, not the exhibition.

Joe Jackson, Geron Johnson, Shaq Goodwin, Michael Dixon, with either Michael Wilson or David Pellom rounding out the starting five.

But it will change probably as the season progresses. A season having no players with head games helps. Buy into the program, play as a team, lose as a team, and strive to improve every week until the final game.

Did he find an extra year of eligibility after all this time? Now, that's working the system.

First guess nailed it, except for the old guy who's not on the team.

Told you it was obvious.

If clutch is on the bench and its a 3 guard lineup then it's easy to figure out with Pellom and shaq starting.

Joe
Mike D
Geron
Shaq
Pellom

Granted the starting lineup doesn't mean much cause we have so many players that can and will play.

(10-23-2013 06:06 PM)MTigerBlue Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2013 05:50 PM)SayWhat? Wrote: [ -> ]I think the starting five will change as the season progresses just as it did last year. CJP has started the players who practice well and consistently.
Since the team has better depth than in years past, I think he will start with experience and let the incoming class of freshmen ease into the game by picking the spots to give them their minutes.

I have not read the article, but here is my guess as to who will be starting at the beginning of the regular season, not the exhibition.

Joe Jackson, Geron Johnson, Shaq Goodwin, Michael Dixon, with either Michael Wilson or David Pellom rounding out the starting five.

But it will change probably as the season progresses. A season having no players with head games helps. Buy into the program, play as a team, lose as a team, and strive to improve every week until the final game.

Did he find an extra year of eligibility after all this time? Now, that's working the system.

Yeah, my bad, guess Damien would not appreciate that. At least I did not say Michael Jackson instead of Joe.